News

Zero Tolerance Is Effective for Physician Addicts : Monitoring, testing, and consequences for relapse could be extended to abusers in other settings.


 

SAN FRANCISCO – Zero tolerance for substance abuse and random testing have been the keys to successful rehabilitation of addicted doctors in physicians' health programs–and might help nonphysician populations of addicts.

Some of the program elements that have worked well for addicted physicians are beginning to be applied with surprisingly good results in other settings, especially the criminal justice system, Dr. Robert L. DuPont said. “If it's good enough for physicians, why not for everyone else?” he asked.

Intensive monitoring with frequent, random drug and alcohol testing backed by swift and certain consequences for a single relapse appear to keep a large majority of addicts substance free during monitoring periods of up to 5–7 years in recent studies.

That kind of zero-tolerance intensive monitoring differs markedly from competing theories of “harm reduction” and “compassion” for addicts that often amount to “enabling” the addiction, DuPont said.

“If the environment is tolerant of the drug use, then the drug use is more prevalent and it persists. If the environment is intolerant, the use stops, whether it's in physicians or convicted felons,” said Dr. DuPont, who was the first director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse 37 years ago and now is head of the Institute for Behavior and Health, a drug policy nonprofit in Rockville, Md. “If you expect and tolerate relapse, you'll see more of it.”

He and his associates studied 904 consecutive admissions to 16 state physicians' health programs and found that 72% of the physicians were still licensed and practicing with no sign of substance abuse in 5–7 years of monitoring. Twelve percent had their license suspended or dropped, 6% were licensed but not practicing, 4% had retired or left practice, 4% had died, and the outcomes of the rest were unknown (J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2009;36:159–71).

“It's striking how many of them go through successfully,” he said.

The physicians' health programs start with a careful initial evaluation followed by referral to intensive, high-quality treatment, which usually lasts for 1–3 months and is mostly in residential facilities. After treatment, the physicians undergo frequent, random drug and alcohol testing for 5 years or longer. Each work day, the physician must call a phone number to find out whether he or she will be tested that day.

The programs are closely tied to community support, mainly the 12-step groups of Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous.

Participants who leave the program or have a single positive test for drugs or alcohol are removed from practice and sent to more intensive treatment. In addition, they risk losing their medical license after a repeat relapse.

“It's interesting that it's not a treatment program. They don't provide the treatment. It's a care management program,” and the treatment is only a few months out of years of monitoring, Dr. DuPont said.

A separate program applied similar intensive monitoring and zero-tolerance elements but without treatment and in nonphysicians. South Dakota's “24/7 Sobriety Project” required people convicted of driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence of alcohol to undergo 4 months of frequent testing. Any positive result or a missed test resulted in an immediate short-term stay in jail, usually for a few days. Testing initially required participants to come to a sheriff's office at 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. for alcohol breath tests, but the program later offered the alternatives of wearing an alcohol-monitoring ankle bracelet, frequent urinalysis, or wearing drug patches that collect sweat samples for drug testing.

From 2005 to 2009, 67% of 11,956 participants who underwent twice-daily breath tests never failed a test, and 17% failed only once, according to an unpublished analysis by Dr. DuPont and his associates. Among 1,383 participants who wore ankle bracelets, 75% had no violations. The program did 415 tests of patches from 45 participants, and 94% of tests were passes. The 1,261 participants who took 17,730 urine tests passed 98% of the time.

Dr. DuPont said the “quite remarkable” results probably were tied to intensive monitoring plus swift and certain consequences that were serious but not severe. He acknowledged, however, that monitoring was short term and that the program did not cover drugs of abuse.

Another model is being tried in Hawaii's Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) program, which enrolls people on probation for the most serious drug problems or crimes (such as murder or rape) regardless of substance abuse.

In that program, participants undergo random drug testing for up to 6 years and are offered a treatment option. Noncompliance will result in immediate, short-term jail stays, usually within 72 hours of the offense, and possible mandatory inpatient or residential treatment.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Varenicline Helps Smoking Cessation in Patients With COPD
MDedge Psychiatry
No Decline in Alcohol Use by Pregnant Women
MDedge Psychiatry
OA Patients' End-of-Day Pain Recall Reliable : Characteristics such as age, gender, race, joint site had no significant interactions with accuracy.
MDedge Psychiatry
Isocarboxazid Appears to Reduce Migraine Frequency
MDedge Psychiatry
Warn Older ADHD Teens About Addiction Risks
MDedge Psychiatry
Magnetic Stimulation Device Effective Against Migraine Pain
MDedge Psychiatry
Attitudes 'Out of Sync' On Buprenorphine
MDedge Psychiatry
Alcohol withdrawal: When to choose an adjunctive anticonvulsant
MDedge Psychiatry
Heroin’s toxic effects
MDedge Psychiatry
When anticonvulsants might work best
MDedge Psychiatry