News

Integrated Care for Depression in Diabetes

View on the News

Dr. Bell's Perspective

Psychiatrists have long been aware of the strong association between

depression and diabetes, as a large number of the patients we treat for

depression also seem to have diabetes. Although it is difficult for us

to know whether their morbidity from diabetes is secondary to their

depression and lack of motivation to engage in quality self-care or if

some how their diabetes is contributing to their depression (or a

combination of both), it behooves physicians to take care of the entire

patient.

Unfortunately, the disconnect between mental and physical health is a

deep-seated problem dating back to the 17th century, when René

Descartes wrote about mind-body dualism. Further, the lack of respect

given to psychiatry in medical schools does not help physicians who

practice physical medicine develop respect for the relationship between

the mind and the body or the field of psychiatry in general. Without

that fundamental respect, it is nearly impossible to provide holistic

medical care to the entire patient, because doing so requires

interdisciplinary teamwork.

As the evidence base linking depression and diabetes continues to

expand, and as research continues to show that treating depression in

patients with diabetes greatly improves their mental and physical health

outcomes, the failure of general medical practitioners to consider

their diabetic patients' depressive disorders will be a liability risk,

and it will become ever more clear that not addressing the comorbid

depression is unethical.

Ultimately, it might be that science and the fear of malpractice will

force a more interdisciplinary approach, as it has in other areas. For

example, since it has become clear that new generation antipsychotic

drugs put patients at risk for obesity and other medical complications,

psychiatrists are now weighing patients and determining their body mass

index before prescribing these drugs. Science tells us that not doing so

would be unethical, and malpractice law suggests it would be a

liability risk. Perhaps the strength of the science linking depression

and diabetes will produce the same level of concern.


 

Prospective study participants included low-income Hispanic and African American adults with elevated HbA1c levels. They underwent a low-intensity (two-question) primary care screen for depression, which, if positive, was followed by a computerized diagnostic interview survey for the diagnosis of depression. Patients with depression were then randomized to receive the antidepressant sertraline or placebo. At 6 months, the sertraline group demonstrated greater improvements in HbA1c levels and systolic blood pressure, compared with the control group, and both groups had improved depression scores–possibly because of the increased contact with a “sympathetic questioner,” according to the authors. They noted that the screening questions had positive prediction for depression ranging from 67% to 84%, indicating the value of a low-intensity screen and computerized assessment in the primary care setting (Diabetes Care 2009;32:2156–60).

Combined behavioral interventions also can play an important role in the management of depression in adult patients with diabetes. Mary de Groot, Ph.D., of Indiana University, Indianapolis, and her colleagues recently reported the results of a study designed to test the effectiveness of a combination behavioral approach to the treatment of depression in adult patients with type 2 diabetes living in the rural Appalachian region. The 12-week interdisciplinary intervention, called Program ACTIVE, combined concurrent cognitive behavioral therapy and community-based exercise. The study enrolled 50 adults with diabetes who had screened positive for depression at baseline. Immediately after the intervention and at 3 months after the intervention, the mean Beck Depression Inventory scores of the participants improved significantly relative to baseline, and more than half of the patients no longer met the criteria for major depressive disorder, the authors reported.

With respect to diabetes outcomes, significant improvements were observed in blood glucose levels and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels relative to baseline, both immediately after and 3 months after the intervention, the authors wrote (Diabetes Spectrum 2010;23:18–25).

Interventions such as Program ACTIVE can be successful in improving depression and diabetes outcomes despite geographic and financial obstacles “if they are flexible in their approach and make use of community resources to facilitate participant self-care,” according to Dr. de Groot. “In doing so, there is great opportunity to address the significant costs associated with comorbid depression and diabetes.”

By Diana Mahoney. Share your thoughts and suggestions at cpnews@elsevier.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Stick With Positive Trial Results When Prescribing Antidepressants
MDedge Psychiatry
Relationship Seen Between Falls, Depression in Preschoolers
MDedge Psychiatry
Some Men Talk About Depression Differently : Older men should be encouraged to talk about changes in work, health, and family context.
MDedge Psychiatry
Persistence Critical in Severe Teen Depression
MDedge Psychiatry
Discontinuing an antidepressant?
MDedge Psychiatry
Osteoporosis in depression: Which patients are at risk?
MDedge Psychiatry
Sex-related differences in antidepressant response: When to adjust treatment
MDedge Psychiatry
Do beta blockers cause depression?
MDedge Psychiatry
How differences among generics might affect your patient’s response
MDedge Psychiatry
Pharmacokinetic considerations when prescribing during pregnancy
MDedge Psychiatry