Mehmet E. Dokucu, MD, PhD Associate Professor Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, Illinois
Philip G. Janicak, MD Adjunct Professor Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, Illinois
Disclosures Dr. Dokucu reports no financial relationships with any companies whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products. Dr. Janicak is a speaker for Otsuka PsychU program and TMS Health Solutions.
The most common (≥5%) treatment-emergent adverse effects were somnolence (15%), headache (9%), dizziness (8%), upper respiratory tract infection (8%), diarrhea (6%), and sedation (5%). Two patients experienced a serious adverse event: one who received zuranolone (confusional state) and one who received placebo (pancreatitis). One patient discontinued zuranolone due to adverse effects vs no discontinuations among those who received placebo. The risk of taking zuranolone while breastfeeding is not known.
Device-based strategies
In addition to FDA-cleared approaches (eg, electroconvulsive therapy [ECT], vagus nerve stimulation [VNS], transcranial magnetic stimulation [TMS]), other devices have also demonstrated promising results.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)involves delivering weak electrical current to the cerebral cortex through small scalp electrodes to produce the following effects:
anodal tDCS enhances cortical excitability
cathodal tDCS reduces cortical excitability.
A typical protocol consists of delivering 1 to 2 mA over 20 minutes with scalp electrodes placed in different configurations based on the targeted symptom(s).
While tDCS has been evaluated as a treatment for various neuropsychiatric disorders, including bipolar depression, Parkinson’s disease, and schizophrenia, most trials have looked at its use for treating depression. Results have been promising but mixed. For example, 1 meta-analysis of 6 RCTs (comprising 96 active and 80 sham tDCS courses) reported that active tDCS was superior to a sham procedure (Hedges’ g = 0.743) for symptoms of depression.18 By contrast, another meta-analysis of 6 RCTs (N = 200) did not find a significant difference between active and sham tDCS for response and remission rates.19 More recently, a group of experts created an evidence-based guideline using a systematic review of the controlled trial literature. These authors concluded there is “probable efficacy for anodal tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (with right orbitofrontal cathode) in major depressive episodes without drug resistance but probable inefficacy for drug-resistant major depressive episodes.”20