Evidence-Based Reviews

Risk factors for nonsuicidal self-injury: A review of the evidence

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Membership in certain youth subcultures (eg, emo or goth) has been evaluated as potential risk factors for depression and deliberate self-harm. Bowes et al33 found that for each unit increase in goth affiliation (not at all, not very much, somewhat, more than somewhat, very much), youth were 1.52 times more likely to engage in SHB; these researchers also reported a dose-response association between goth identification and future SHB. This study asked participants if they have ever tried to harm or hurt themselves in any manner, but did not distinguish between individuals who had harmed themselves with and without suicidal intent.33

Personality traits such as impulsiveness and loneliness have been linked to NSSI among adolescents.34,35 A recent study found that adolescents who met the proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for NSSI scored higher on the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, specifically in measures of:

  • motor impulsiveness (ie, acting without thinking)
  • attentional impulsiveness (ie, making decisions quickly)
  • impulsiveness due to lack of planning (ie, failure to plan for the future).34

This study also found that adolescents who identified as being lonely based on scores on the Brazilian Loneliness Scale were at a higher risk for NSSI.34

A recent systematic review (32 studies) and meta-analysis (9 studies) found that school absenteeism was associated with a risk of self-harm (pooled aOR 1.37, P = .01) and suicidal ideation (pooled aOR 1.20, P = .03).36 This study suggested that school absenteeism, an important marker of social exclusion, was associated with both SHB and suicidal ideation in young people.36 It defined SHB as any act of self-injury or self-poisoning, regardless of intent.36

Finally, family-related factors have been associated with an increased risk of NSSI. One study of 11,814 children age 9 and 10 revealed that high family conflict (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.14) and low parental monitoring (OR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93 to 0.98) were associated with NSSI.37 A smaller, community-based study found that adolescents with NSSI reported significantly less maternal support and warmth than nonclinical controls, but a cause-and-effect relationship has not yet been determined.38 Parental history alone may influence adolescents’ risk of NSSI. A study that included nearly 76,000 youth found that adolescents with perceived parental alcohol problems had higher odds of self-injury, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts.39 Adolescents exposed to maternal or paternal adversities were also at a higher risk of self-harm (hazard ratio 1.5 to 5.4 among males, 1.7 to 3.9 among females).40

Continue to: NSSI risk factors for adults

Pages

Recommended Reading

Anorexia linked to notable shrinkage of key brain structures
MDedge Psychiatry
Mobile devices ‘addictive by design’: Obesity is one of many health effects
MDedge Psychiatry
Children with migraine at high risk of comorbid anxiety, depression
MDedge Psychiatry
Are social networks threatening adolescents’ mental health?
MDedge Psychiatry
Early childhood allergies linked with ADHD and ASD
MDedge Psychiatry
Depression screens do not reduce suicidal acts in teens: Study
MDedge Psychiatry
Anxiety spreads from mother to daughter, father to son
MDedge Psychiatry
Clinical characteristics of recurrent RIME elucidated in chart review
MDedge Psychiatry
The impact of COVID-19 on adolescents’ mental health
MDedge Psychiatry
High rate of mental health problems in transgender children
MDedge Psychiatry