Evidence-Based Reviews

SSRIs in children and adolescents: Where do we stand?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Untreated pediatric depression is associated with substantial morbidity, including reduced academic performance, substance abuse, interpersonal problems, social withdrawal, and a poor quality of life,4,5 It also increases the risk of suicide.

Early-onset depression is considered a more malignant illness than adult-onset depression because of its effect on development, potential for recurrence,6 and chronicity into adulthood.7 The quest to develop appropriate treatment for depressed children and adolescents has been spurred by:

  • the substantial risks of morbidity and mortality from childhood depression
  • advances in drug treatments for adult-onset depression
  • recognition that early-onset depression is treatable.

Physiologically, children are not “mini-adults.” Thus, practicing evidence-based medicine requires separate empirical research for pediatric conditions.

Despite some efforts by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the pharmaceutical industry, research in pediatric psychopharmacology and ancillary treatments lags decades behind evidence-based treatment in adults.

Table 2

Efficacy of SSRIs and other newer antidepressants in short-term, placebo-controlled pediatric studies in major depressive disorder

DrugAge rangeOutcome* (drug vs. placebo)
Paroxetine
Study 1
Study 2
Study 3
12 to 18
13 to 18
7 to 17
Negative†
Negative
Negative
Fluoxetine
Study 1
Study 2
8 to 17
8 to 17
Positive
Positive
Sertraline
Study 1
Study 2
6 to 17
6 to 17
Trend
Negative§
Venlafaxine
Study 1
Study 2
7 to 17
7 to 17
Negative
Negative
Citalopram
Study 1
Study 2
7 to 17
13 to 18
Positive
Negative
Nefazodone
Study 1
Study 2
12 to 18
7 to 17
Trend
Negative
Mirtazapine
Study 1
Study 2
7 to 17
7 to 17
Negative
Negative
* Positive (P 0.05); Negative (P >0.10; Trend (0.05
† Positive on most secondary endpoints
§ Positive on pooling of 2 studies
Source: Adapted and reprinted from Laughren TP. Memorandum: Background comments for Feb. 2, 2004 meeting of Psychopharmacological Drugs Advisory Committee and Pediatric Subcommittee of the Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee. Appendix I. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Food and Drug Administration, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services.

From tricyclics to SSRIS

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) were the mainstay in treating childhood depression two decades ago, based on clinical and anecdotal evidence. However, double blind, placebo-controlled studies failed to show that TCAs were effective in treating depressed children and adolescents. The few controlled studies included small samples of children and adolescents, and the methodologies were often flawed.

In the late 1980s, TCA use in children dropped precipitously because of:

  • episodes of sudden death in pediatric patients taking desipramine
  • introduction of SSRIs as safer alternatives.

The causal link between sudden death and desipramine was tenuous; Biederman’s article comparing children exposed versus not exposed to TCAs did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in sudden death.8 Even so, fear of cardiotoxicity in children curtailed TCAs’ use.

SSRIs are now are now usually considered firstline antidepressants for children and adolescents because they are presumed to be safer than TCAs. SSRIs are associated with minimal cardiotoxicity and anticholinergic effects, a wider margin of safety in overdose than TCAs, and demonstrated efficacy.

A 12-week, double-blind study compared paroxetine, 20 to 40 mg/d, imipramine, up to 300 mg/d, and placebo in 275 adolescents with major depression.9 Patients receiving paroxetine improved significantly more than patients receiving placebo, as measured by reductions in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total scores and other scales. Response to imipramine was not significantly different from placebo.

Discontinuation rates because of side effects were 9.7% for paroxetine and 31.5% (nearly one-third because of cardiovascular side effects) for imipramine. The average imipramine dosage of 200 mg/d was higher than usual, however.

Table 3

Recommended antidepressant dosages for children and adolescents

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
DrugDosageComments
CitalopramOnce-daily
Children: 10 to 20 mg
Adolescents: 10 to 40 mg
Antianxiety component
Limited pediatric data
Less effect on P-450 isoenzyme systems than other SSRIs, with fewer drug-drug interactions claimed
EscitalopramOnce-daily
Children: 5 to 10 mg
Adolescents: 10 mg
L-isomer of citalopram, purported to have lesser side effects than parent compound
No data in children
FluoxetineOnce-daily
Children: 5 to 20 mg
Adolescents: 10 to 60 mg
Antianxiety properties
More effective than placebo in trials of adolescent depression11-12
Long half-life; watch for drug-drug interactions
FluvoxamineDivided
Children: 50 to 100 mg/d
Adolescents: 50 to 200 mg/d
Useful in depression with comorbid obsessive-compulsive symptoms
No data for pediatric depression
ParoxetineOnce-daily
Children: 10 to 20 mg
Adolescents: 10 to 40 mg
Similar profile as fluoxetine but shorter half-life
Not recommended in pediatric patients (FDA advisory)
SertralineDivided
Children: 25 to100 mg/d
Adolescents: 50 to 200 mg/d
Less activating and shorter half-life than fluoxetine
Other reuptake inhibitors
DrugDosageComment
BupropionDivided
Children: 75 to 250 mg/d
Adolescents: 75 to 400 mg/d
Useful in depression with comorbid attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder
No controlled data in children
Nefazodone Divided Children: 100 to 300 mg/d
Adolescents: 200 to 600 mg/d
5HT2-receptor and serotonin-reuptake blocker
Venlafaxine Divided or once-daily Children: 18.75 to 75 mg/d
Adolescents: 37.5 to 150 mg/d
Noradrenergic and serotonergic effects
Limited pediatric data; not recommended in depressed pediatric patients (manufacturer advisory)
Source: Adapted and reprinted with permission from Sood B, Sood R. Depression in children and adolescents. In: Levenson JL (ed). Depression: key diseases series. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians, 2000:244.

Recommended Reading

ECT: Effective, but it has an image problem
MDedge Psychiatry
Irritable bowel syndrome and psychiatric illness: Three clinical challenges
MDedge Psychiatry
Reducing suicide risk in psychiatric disorders
MDedge Psychiatry
COPD: How to manage comorbid depression and anxiety
MDedge Psychiatry
Depressed patients won’t exercise? 7 ways to get them started
MDedge Psychiatry
Christmas depression: The data may surprise you
MDedge Psychiatry
Omega-3 fatty acids: Do ‘fish oils’ have a therapeutic role in psychiatry?
MDedge Psychiatry
Psychotic depression: State-of-the-art algorithm improves odds for remission
MDedge Psychiatry
Preventing late-life suicide: 6 steps to detect the warning signs
MDedge Psychiatry
Minding menopause: Psychotropics vs. estrogen? What you need to know now
MDedge Psychiatry