Evidence-Based Reviews

Deposition dos and don’ts: How to answer 8 tricky questions

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

At the first conference, volunteer all pertinent information about the case as well as any noteworthy medical inconsistencies.2 Find out what documents to bring to the deposition, who will be present, and the expected duration. You might wish to prepare mentally by inquiring about the style and personality of opposing counsel.

Defense counsel does not control how long a deposition lasts but might be able to give a rough estimate. Plan accordingly, and allow for sufficient scheduling flexibility. Depositions typically last half a day, but they can last more than 1 day.

At a later predeposition conference, defense counsel might walk you through a mock deposition that involves difficult or anticipated questions. This is a good opportunity to master your anxiety and improve your effectiveness as a witness.

You also may wish to go over your curriculum vitae with defense counsel and check it for mistakes or other content that might raise problematic questions during the deposition (Table 2). Make sure your c.v. is up-to-date, and refresh your memory if it lists lectures given or articles written—no matter how long ago—on topics related to the litigation.

Table 2

Malpractice: How to prepare for your deposition

Thoroughly review case records
Master the case (memorize key names, dates, facts)
Meet with defense counsel at least twice to:
  • find out deposition’s location, who will be present, and expected duration
  • learn what documents to bring
  • understand opposing counsel’s style and personality
  • prepare for difficult questions
  • consider having a mock deposition
Double-check your curriculum vitae for accuracy and updating
Come to the deposition well-rested

On deposition day

Don’t open Pandora’s box. Keep your answers to deposition questions brief and clear. Opposing counsel may ask broad questions, hoping to encourage rambling answers that reveal new facts. Answering questions briefly provides the least information to opposing counsel and is best under most circumstances.

One exception may involve scenarios in which the defense attorney instructs you, for various reasons, to provide information beyond the question asked. For example, when a case is close to settling, your attorney might instruct you to lay out all evidence that supports your professional judgment and clinical decisions in the case. Do not use this approach, however, unless your attorney specifically instructs you to do so.

You are under no obligation to make op-posing counsel’s job easier. In a discovery deposition, volunteering information may:

  • open up new areas for questioning
  • equip the deposing attorney with more ammunition
  • eliminate opportunities for your attorney to use surprise as a strategy, should the case go to trial.

Consider, for example, a scenario in which you and a hospital are sued in regard to an inpatient suicide case. At deposition, you might be asked whether you can identify written evidence anywhere in the patient’s chart that the decedent was checked every 15 minutes.

The correct answer would be “no,” even though you know 15-minute checks are documented in a log kept at the nursing station in this hospital. You might be tempted to reveal this information, but leave the timing of its disclosure to the defense attorney. Your attorney’s strategy may be to reveal this critical piece of information at trial, when the plaintiff’s attorney has less opportunity to strategize ways to discredit the evidence.

Keep your cool. Attorneys have different styles of questioning, depending on their personalities. Some may be excessively polite or friendly to get you to let down your guard—only to set you up for a devastating blow at the deposition’s end (or save this for trial). Other attorneys might employ a “bullying” style that seeks to intimidate. In responding to questions, always remain composed and resist the urge to counterattack.

In all circumstances, strive for humility and dignified confidence. Opposing counsel gains the advantage when defendants lose composure or become angry, defensive, or arrogant. Indeed, experienced plaintiff’s attorneys may be testing for precisely this reaction in the hope that a defendant will “demonstrate his arrogance” during the deposition or later on the witness stand.12

In working as expert witnesses in malpractice cases, we have observed many instances in which a defendant psychiatrist’s arrogant or hostile remarks at deposition played a key role in causing the case to be prematurely settled in the plaintiff’s favor.

Avoid making jokes or sarcastic comments. Even a well-timed, self-deprecating joke may backfire should opposing counsel take the opportunity to point out that the case is a “serious matter.”

Pages

Recommended Reading

Smartphones: Ask 4 questions before you buy
MDedge Psychiatry
Can virtual reality help your patients?
MDedge Psychiatry
Drs. Lake and Hurwitz respond
MDedge Psychiatry
A prescription to improve drug regimens?
MDedge Psychiatry
Getting too many e-alerts?
MDedge Psychiatry
PDA prescription program pros and cons
MDedge Psychiatry
Are irreputable health sites hurting your patients?
MDedge Psychiatry
PowerPoint: 6 presentation peeves
MDedge Psychiatry
Online clinical resources: To pay or not to pay?
MDedge Psychiatry
Boundary crossings: Guard against inappropriate contact
MDedge Psychiatry