Evidence-Based Reviews
Late-life depression: Focused IPT eases loss and role changes
Interpersonal psychotherapy focuses on here and now.
Michael J. Constantino, PhD
President, North American Society for Psychotherapy Research
Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director
Department of Psychology
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Amherst, Massachusetts
Roger P. Greenberg, PhD
Distinguished Professor and Head, Psychology Division
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science
State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York
Holly B. Laws, PhD
Postdoctoral Researcher
NIMH T32 Program
Research Training in Functional Disability Interventions
Department of Psychiatry
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut
Algorithm helps determine when behavioral therapy, medication are appropriate
Major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently is recurrent, with new episodes causing substantial social and economic impairment1 and increasing the likelihood of future episodes.2 For this reason, contemporary psychiatric practitioners think of depression treatment as long-term and plan thoughtfully for maintenance therapy.
Recognizing the importance of engaging depressed individuals beyond the initial response,3 American Psychiatric Association practice guidelines conceptualize depression treatment as 3 phases:
• acute treatment, with the aim of remission (symptom removal)
• continuation treatment, with the aim of preventing relapse (symptom return)
• maintenance treatment, with the aim of preventing recurrence (new episodes).4
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is an evidence-based psychosocial treatment that adheres to this model.5 As a time-limited, manual-driven6,7 approach, IPT focuses on interpersonal distresses as precipitating and perpetuating factors of depression.8
Acute IPT’s efficacy is well-established across >200 empirical studies—making it an evidence-based, first-line treatment for adult depression.4,9,10 Meta-analyses show that acute IPT is superior to placebo and no-treatment controls, and largely comparable to antidepressant medication and other active, first-line psychotherapies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).11,12
Although this review, as well as the literature, focuses largely on adult outpatients with depression, evidence of IPT’s general efficacy exists for adolescents,13 chronically depressed patients,11 and depressed inpatients.14 This article presents a case study to describe the structure of IPT when used to treat depressed adults. We also present evidence of IPT’s acute and long-term efficacy in preventing depression recurrence and data to guide its use in practice.
CASE REPORT
‘Safe’ but depressed
Timothy, age 18, is a first-year college student who presents for outpatient psychotherapy to address recurrent depression. He reports general unhappiness, loss of interest in things, low energy, sleep problems, poor academic and work functioning, and low self-esteem. He experienced at least 3 similar depressive episodes while in high school.
The therapist’s diagnostic and interpersonal assessment suggests that Timothy’s depression is interpersonally driven. Timothy longs for relational intimacy but fears he will fail or burden people with his needs. He has difficulty gauging appropriate levels of enmeshment with others and either becomes overdependent or stays at a distance. This “safe” approach to relationships contributes to boredom, loneliness, and isolation. His recent transition to college away from home and the failure of a romantic relationship have compounded these experiences.
Interpersonal model of IPT
IPT conceptualizes depression as involving predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating biopsychosocial factors, including:
• underlying biological and social vulnerability, such as insecure attach ment (ie, tenuous and often negative views of self and others)
• current interpersonal life stressors
• inadequate social supports.15,16
For example, poor early attachment to caregivers can give rise to despair, isolation, and low mood. In turn, this can be exacerbated by poor social and communication skills that promote further rejection and withdrawal of social support and thus, intensified despair, isolation, and low mood. As in Timothy’s case, this vicious cycle underscores psychosocial stressors as a causal factor, maintaining factor, and result of depression. Specifically, IPT conceptualizes 4 main biopsychosocial problem domains:
• grief and loss
• interpersonal disputes
• role transitions
• interpersonal/communication deficits (often connected to isolation).
Working within 1 or 2 of the most salient problem domains, IPT centers on strategies for helping patients solve interpersonal problems based on the notion that modified relationships, revised interpersonal expectations, improved communications, and increased social support will lead to symptom reduction.15-17
Many techniques are utilized in IPT (Table 1) to help patients modify their interpersonal relationships as a mechanism for decreasing their distress. IPT is problem-focused, aiming to improve patients’ relationships by drawing on their assets and helping to build skills around shortcomings. Therefore, IPT focuses on observable interpersonal patterns, as opposed to latent personality dynamics.
CASE CONTINUED
Setting goals
When the clinical explains in the non-technical terms the data supporting IPT’s efficacy for depression, including with young adults, Timothy agrees to teeatment with acute IPT. The therapist behins with consciousness-raising techniques to help Timothy adopt the “sick role” by viewing depressing as an illness to be cured. Collaboratively, they establish treatment goals that fit the IPT formulation of depression— ie, revising current relationships and expectations of them, increasing social support, improving communication skills, and solving problems within 1 or 2 of the IPT problem domains.
For Timothy, the most pressing psychosocial problems seem to be interpersonal deficits and role transitions. He appears to be insecurely attached to others, which is a risk factor for poor facilitation of, and boundaries around, good relationships. A transition to a new and intimidating interpersonal context—living on a college campus—compounded his vulnerabilities and increased his depression.
Acute treatment. The acute phase of IPT is time-limited—often, 12 to 16 sessions with gradual tapering toward the end (akin to a continuation phase). The time limit’s purpose is to focus both patient and therapist on the specific goal of removing the acute “illness” of depression. The IPT clinician takes an interpersonal inventory to learn about the patient’s most important relationships and hones in on the IPT domain foci. Working collaboratively, the therapist might help the patient mourn a loss, reconstruct a narrative with a deceased loved one, consider ways to increase social contact, develop assertiveness, label feelings and needs, resolve an impasse with a significant other, and so forth.
Interpersonal psychotherapy focuses on here and now.
Symptoms, course, and treatment vary based on patients’ age, stage of life