News

Autopsy studies verify flutemetamol’s ability to identify brain beta-amyloid

View on the News

Clinical usefulness limited at present

A scan that accurately detects beta-amyloid is not the same thing as a test for Alzheimer’s disease. Approximately 25% of cognitively normal older adults and nearly 50% of people older than 80 years also show beta-amyloid on PET scans, as do patients with conditions such as dementia with Lewy bodies and cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

Courtesy Dr. Gil D. Rabinovici

Dr. Gil D. Rabinovici

In addition, it is concerning that one of the five rigorously trained PET scan readers frequently overestimated the amount of beta-amyloid and showed worryingly low specificity (44%) in interpreting these scans. At present, PET amyloid imaging should be considered only for patients in whom there is considerable diagnostic uncertainty after a comprehensive clinical evaluation and in whom knowledge of beta-amyloid status is likely to change diagnosis and management. This would include patients with unexplained mild cognitive impairment, with atypical or mixed presentations, and those who present with dementia at an unusually early age.

Dr. Gil D. Rabinovici is at the Memory and Aging Center in the department of neurology at the University of California, San Francisco. He reported receiving speaking honoraria from GE Healthcare, maker of [18F]flutemetamol and funder of Dr. Curtis’s study, and research support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Eli Lilly. Dr. Rabinovici made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Curtis’s report (JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:265-6).


 

FROM JAMA NEUROLOGY

References

PET scans using radio-labeled flutemetamol were safe to use in vivo and confirmed the presence or absence of neuritic beta-amyloid levels “with high sensitivity and specificity” in a phase III trial involving 68 terminally ill older adults.

“In-vivo detection of brain beta-amyloid may help increase diagnostic accuracy in cognitively impaired patients, compared with clinical diagnosis alone,” wrote Dr. Craig Curtis of Compass Research, Orlando, and his associates in their report (JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:287-94).

The PET scanning agent used in the study, [18F]flutemetamol (Vizamyl), binds with high affinity to beta-amyloid but rapidly clears from normal brain tissue; it was approved in October 2013 for PET imaging of the brain in adults being evaluated for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.

The trial involved 203 consecutive patients attending 19 dementia clinics, memory centers, and hospices in the United States and England who were aged 55 years and older and who had a life expectancy of 1 year or less. A total of 180 who underwent [18F]flutemetamol PET scanning comprised the population for the safety analysis. A subset of 68 patients who died during the study period underwent autopsy so that brain pathology could be compared with the PET images; these patients comprised the sensitivity/specificity analysis.

Five specially trained readers who were blinded to patient information – four nuclear medicine physicians and one radiologist – independently interpreted the PET scans as being either positive or negative for neuritic beta-amyloid. All the images were of good technical quality, and none were considered unevaluable.

On postmortem examination, 25 of the 68 brains (37%) were found to be beta-amyloid negative and 43 (63%) to be beta-amyloid positive.

The sensitivity of [18F]flutemetamol PET scanning ranged from 81% to 93% (median, 88%) across the five scan readers, and the specificity ranged from 44% to 92% (median, 88%). One of the readers frequently overestimated the level of beta-amyloid in the scans and was considered an outlier regarding specificity. Between-reader agreement was 90% or higher when that reader’s interpretations were excluded from the analysis, the investigators said.

Overall, 6 (14%) of 43 brains found to be beta-amyloid positive at autopsy were read as false negatives, and 2 (8%) of 25 brains found to be beta-amyloid–negative at autopsy were read as false positives.

The intravenous [18F]flutemetamol injections were well tolerated, and no adverse events were attributed to the agent or the PET procedure. However, four participants were withdrawn from the study because they were unable to remain motionless in the scanner.

This study was funded by GE Healthcare, maker of [18F]flutemetamol, which also planned and conducted the data analysis. Dr. Curtis reported having no financial disclosures; his associates reported numerous ties to industry sources.

Recommended Reading

Advisory panel: Advanced dementia patients need better access to end-of-life care
MDedge Psychiatry
Memory disorders
MDedge Psychiatry
Clearing up confusion
MDedge Psychiatry
Autonomy vs abuse: Can a patient choose a new power of attorney?
MDedge Psychiatry
A teen with seizures, amnesia, and troubled family dynamics
MDedge Psychiatry
Abnormal calcium level in a psychiatric presentation? Rule out parathyroid disease
MDedge Psychiatry
Pathologic proteins in Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s also collect in skin cells
MDedge Psychiatry
Consortium opens Alzheimer’s data to global research community
MDedge Psychiatry
GAO calls for expanded efforts to reduce antipsychotic use in older dementia patients
MDedge Psychiatry
Study identifies factors for minimizing the impact of Alzheimer’s genetic risk
MDedge Psychiatry

Related Articles