News

Poor response to third anti-TNF agent seen in most psoriatic arthritis patients


 

FROM JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY

References

Patients with psoriatic arthritis who don’t respond to or cannot tolerate two different anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are likely to respond poorly, if at all, to a third one, according to findings from a prospective, open-label, longitudinal study.

Dr. Lars Erik Kristensen of the department of rheumatology, Parker Institute, Copenhagen, and the department of rheumatology, Lund (Sweden) University Hospital, and his coinvestigators assessed treatment responses in patients treated at 11 European rheumatology centers during a 9-year period to build on the “rather sparse” data concerning second or third courses of anti-TNF treatment in psoriatic arthritis patients. “Our results suggest that other therapeutic options be considered after two courses of anti-TNF treatment have failed,” such as biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs that have different modes of action, they wrote.

The study participants were 217 patients with psoriatic arthritis who were switching from one anti-TNF agent to another and 57 who had tried two anti-TNF agents and were switching to a third. The drugs included etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, and infliximab.

In general, the treatment response rates among patients trying their second agent were markedly greater than those of patients trying their third. Nearly half (47%) of first-time switchers met the primary outcome measure – an ACR 20 response at 3 months – compared with only 22% of second-time switchers, the investigators said (J Rheumatol. 2015 Dec 1. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150744).

The median drug survival (time on treatment) was 64 months for the first group, compared with only 14 months for the second group. The estimated 5-year drug survival was 51% for patients trying their second anti-TNF agent, compared with only 23% for patients trying their third.

This study was supported by the Osterlund Foundation, the Kock Foundation, the King Gustav V 80-Year Fund, Lund University Hospital, the Reumatikerforbundet, and the Oak Foundation. No information was available regarding Dr. Kristensen’s and his associates’ financial disclosures.

rhnews@frontlinemedcom.com

Recommended Reading

ACR: Adalimumab best TNFi for anterior uveitis in ankylosing spondylitis
MDedge Rheumatology
State laws, regulatory concerns complicate biosimilars landscape
MDedge Rheumatology
ACR: Cardiovascular risk factors in psoriatic diseases are common, often go untreated
MDedge Rheumatology
EADV: Pediatric psoriasis called ‘grossly undertreated’
MDedge Rheumatology
EADV: New long-term data on biologics for pediatric psoriasis ‘encouraging’
MDedge Rheumatology
Psoriasis cohort reveals high arthritis risk
MDedge Rheumatology
Steroid use down, biologic use rising in pregnancies of women with rheumatic disease
MDedge Rheumatology
Anti-TNF therapy can continue for IBD patients with skin lesions
MDedge Rheumatology
EADV: Pursuing ‘clear’ in psoriasis worthwhile, expert says
MDedge Rheumatology
Genetic differences may help predict progression of PsC to PsA
MDedge Rheumatology