News

Step therapy and biologics: An easier road ahead?


 

References

Clinical strategies and research gaps

New legislation undoubtedly will help providers and patients get access to their choice of treatment agents. But so long as biologics are expensive – and it will be a while before the first biosimilar drugs, which will have efficacy and safety similar to their reference biologics, reduce prices in any meaningful way – step therapy will likely remain the norm.

One of the key difficulties providers face when pushing back on an insurer in favor of a biologic drug is insufficient clinical evidence.

With IBD, Dr. Rubin said, “we need a need more longitudinal understanding” and better prognostic indicators “in order to justify spending the extra money or going to one of these therapies.”

Dr. Hanauer said one of the limitations he faces in practice is insufficient clinical evidence for biologics early in the treatment pathway for IBD.

RA “is much more common than Crohn’s disease is. In trials, it’s much easier to recruit hundreds of patients [for an RA trial], while with Crohn’s it’s very hard to enroll more than a couple a year at most sites,” he said. “And as you move earlier in the treatment pathway that becomes somewhat more difficult as well.”

His solution for now, he said, is to follow established step pathways in an accelerated way, for “a rapid transition toward highly effective therapies” without having to face extensive pushback from insurers.

“The idea is to initiate immunosuppressants for any patients with sufficient disease activity to justify steroids,” Dr. Hanauer said. “Their steroids are then tapered, and while on immunosuppressants, patients are in a perfect setup to get combination therapy with an immunosuppressive and a biologic – and that’s a 2- to 3-month transition, not 2-3 years.”

Dr. Kolba said that despite the wide array of options for treating RA, the specialty suffers from a dearth of understanding as to why some patients fail drugs while others succeed, even within the same drug class.

Rheumatologists’ prescribing choices would be highly influenced by better biomarkers, were they to become available, she said. And they’d have far better arguments when confronted with payer pushback.

“We’re all looking for that magic biologic marker to tell me which drug to use,” Dr. Kolba said, “because God knows if I had a blood test that said ‘this is the drug,’ I would go to the mat with the insurer.”

Pages

Recommended Reading

Few teen females prescribed teratogenic meds get contraceptive advice, Rx
MDedge Rheumatology
Second dose of herpes zoster vaccine beneficial to seniors
MDedge Rheumatology
Oral steroid dose, duration affect diabetes risk for people with RA
MDedge Rheumatology
‘Hot’ joints may predict RA joint damage
MDedge Rheumatology
ACR: Fewer GCA relapses with add-on abatacept
MDedge Rheumatology
ACR: Etanercept during pregnancy doubles the odds of major malformations
MDedge Rheumatology
ACR: The pain of inflammatory disease goes beyond the physical
MDedge Rheumatology
New case of MS possibly related to tocilizumab
MDedge Rheumatology
ACR: Push back when insurance decisions force TNFi change
MDedge Rheumatology
Biologic treatment in pregnancy requires balancing risks
MDedge Rheumatology