Feature

NAMS hormone therapy guidelines stress individualized treatment


 

Duration of use

Regarding extended use of HT, the NAMS statement breaks with the Beers criteria, saying that routine discontinuation of HT after the age of 65 years “is not supported by data.” These decisions, according to the new recommendations, should be individualized. This is a level III recommendation. Still, said Dr. Kaunitz, “many women grow out of their vasomotor symptoms,” and so an individualized approach might include indefinite use of low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy for GSM, he said.

The overall benefit-risk ratio for HT is also addressed in the position statement, which emphasizes an individualized approach that includes periodic reassessment of risk and benefit for particular patients. However, for patients younger than 60 years of age, or who are within 10 years of menopause, NAMS endorses an overall favorable risk-benefit profile for HT in two particular areas, barring contraindications. For this younger postmenopausal population, hormone therapy is beneficial for bothersome vasomotor symptoms, according to the position statement, and women with an increased risk of osteoporosis or fracture may also benefit from HT.

The benefit-risk profile may tip against HT for women who are starting hormone therapy more than 10 years after menopause, or when they are 60 years old or older, according to the statement. The authors cite elevated risks of coronary heart disease, stroke, venous thromboembolism, and dementia.

Dr. Michael R. McClung

Most HT management decisions can be made in the ob.gyn. or primary care physician’s office, according to Dr. Stuenkel. However, an endocrinology consult might be considered for women with diabetes or other endocrine disorders, or when the symptom picture doesn’t quite fit – when the patient feels you “can’t quite seem to get it right,” she said. Occasionally, a less common condition such as carcinoid or pheochromocytoma may be responsible for vasomotor symptoms. “No one teaches women what hot flashes feel like,” Dr. Stuenkel said.

The recommendations embodied in the new position statement take into account the “substantial benefit” of estrogen for many women, and provide an updated view of the safety of HT, Dr. McClung said. It’s important for physicians to talk to their patients, because “that information has not made it back to the Internet,” he said.

Dr. Pinkerton, Dr. McClung, and Dr. Kaunitz all reported financial relationships with several pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Kaunitz reported receiving royalties from UpToDate. Dr. Stuenkel reported no relevant financial disclosures.

On Twitter @karioakes

Pages

Recommended Reading

Yearly monitoring does not predict fractures after bisphosphonate cessation
MDedge Rheumatology
New agent builds bone bigger, faster
MDedge Rheumatology
Osteoporosis medication use down in older women
MDedge Rheumatology
Universal bisphosphonates after wrist fracture prevent hip fractures but at a cost
MDedge Rheumatology
Subclinical hyperthyroidism linked to higher fracture risk
MDedge Rheumatology
Osteoporosis trends collide for Mexican American women
MDedge Rheumatology
Denosumab better at building bone than zoledronic acid
MDedge Rheumatology
Early estrogen likely prevents bone fractures in Turner syndrome
MDedge Rheumatology
One-time AMH level predicts rapid perimenopausal bone loss
MDedge Rheumatology
Odanacatib reduced fractures but upped stroke risk
MDedge Rheumatology