Law & Medicine

Duty vs. confidentiality


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. Some of the materials have been taken from earlier columns in Internal Medicine News. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Volk v. DeMeerleer, 386 P.3d 254 (Wa. 2016).

2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (Cal. 1976).

3. Thompson v. County of Alameda, 167 Cal. Rptr. 70, 76 (1980).

4. Behav Sci Law. 2001;19(3):325-43.

5. AMA Code of Medical Ethics [2.24 (3), 2012-2013 ed].

6. AMA Code of Medical Ethics, 2017 ed. [3.2.1 Confidentiality].

Pages

Recommended Reading

Prescription drug monitoring programs improve, but challenges remain
MDedge Rheumatology
What can happen if you fail to check the PDMP?
MDedge Rheumatology
Proposed MACRA participation threshold gets mixed reviews
MDedge Rheumatology
HHS Secretary resigns amid flight criticism
MDedge Rheumatology
Ruling: Apologies can’t be used against doctors in court
MDedge Rheumatology
HCA is the country’s highest-volume health system
MDedge Rheumatology
Now missing in EHR charts: a good impression
MDedge Rheumatology
Five takeaways from Congress’ failure to extend funding for children’s coverage
MDedge Rheumatology
MIPS: It’s time to get started
MDedge Rheumatology
Death by meeting
MDedge Rheumatology