Conference Coverage

“Great debates” at ACR 2017 address biosimilar switching, new curricular milestones


 

FROM ACR 2017

Two “Great Debates” at this year’s annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology in San Diego will center on important, but completely separate, issues in rheumatology: whether it is safe to switch to a biosimilar and the relevance of curricular milestones in rheumatology training.

At 2:30 p.m. on Sunday, Nov. 5, a session titled “Biosimilars ... To Switch or Not to Switch? That Is the Question“ will pit Jonathan Kay, MD, against Roy Fleischmann, MD, to try to sway the audience to their point of view in the face of a small evidence base about the consequences of switching.

Dr. Kay, the Timothy S. and Elaine L. Peterson Chair in Rheumatology and professor of medicine at the University of Massachusetts, Worcester, where he directs clinical research in the division of rheumatology, will discuss and defend the usefulness of biosimilars for rheumatoid arthritis in his presentation, “The Data Supports That It Is Safe, Effective and Cost-Effective to Switch to a Biosimilar.” He has been greatly involved in clinical research on the development of biosimilars to treat rheumatic diseases in recent years.

In his presentation, “The Data Is Not Convincing. One Study Cannot Be Generalized to All Indications, and Some Studies Suggest That It Is Not Safe, Not Effective and Not Cost-Effective to Switch All Patients (YET) to a Biosimilar,” Dr. Fleischmann will discuss and defend the position that biosimilars are not yet well-enough researched to confidently allow switching. Dr. Fleischmann is clinical professor in the department of internal medicine at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

At 7:30 a.m. on Monday, Nov. 6, two clinician-educators will advocate for opposing opinions in “The Great (Educational) Debate: Milestones: Meaningful vs. Millstone.” The debate will focus on the relative merits of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s Next Accreditation System, which in 2013 led to a paradigm shift in how training programs approach curriculum development, and how both trainees and their programs are assessed.

Calvin Brown, MD, professor of medicine in the division of rheumatology and director of the rheumatology training program at Northwestern University, Chicago, will describe the reported and perceived benefits of the milestones, while Simon Helfgott, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, will summarize the arguments that underlie the call for radical change in the milestones system of evaluation

Recommended Reading

Rheumatoid arthritis characteristics make large contribution to cardiovascular risk
MDedge Rheumatology
‘Multimorbidities’ in RA make impact on treatment efficacy, disease activity
MDedge Rheumatology
Immunogenicity concerns for biosimilars so far don’t go beyond originator biologics
MDedge Rheumatology
Launch of adalimumab biosimilar Amjevita postponed
MDedge Rheumatology
Too few RA patients get timely adjustment of DMARDs
MDedge Rheumatology
Flu shots and persuasion
MDedge Rheumatology
High ‘nocebo’ effect observed when patients knowingly switch to a biosimilar
MDedge Rheumatology
Rheumatoid arthritis increases risk of COPD hospitalizations
MDedge Rheumatology
Biosimilars poised to save $54 billion over the next decade
MDedge Rheumatology
In close vote, advisory panel prefers Shingrix over Zostavax
MDedge Rheumatology