Reader Poll

Pregnant women in clinical trials: FDA questions how to include them


 

Gerald G. Briggs

Gerald G. Briggs

The draft guidance should take note of the fact that birth defects often don’t appear for months or even longer, according to Gerald Briggs, BPharm, FCCP, clinical professor of pharmacy at the University of California, San Francisco. “Until first year of life or later, the babies need to be monitored,” he said in an interview.

Mr. Briggs, who led a 2015 report examining the role of pregnant women in phase 4 clinical drug trials, added that the document should take note of recommendations from clinical teratologists regarding the design of animal studies that should be performed prior to human trials (Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):810-5).

Comments on the draft guidance can be made at www.federalregister.gov and are due by June 8, 2018.

Dr. Chambers and Mr. Briggs reported no relevant disclosures.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Study sheds light on pregnancy outcomes following ocrelizumab treatment
MDedge Rheumatology
VIDEO: Biologic use during pregnancy had no impact on serious infection risks in infants
MDedge Rheumatology
Leflunomide use in pregnancy shows little impact on newborns
MDedge Rheumatology
Hydroxychloroquine use rising in SLE pregnancies
MDedge Rheumatology
Get ready for certolizumab for psoriasis
MDedge Rheumatology
Maternal biologic therapy does not affect infant vaccine responses
MDedge Rheumatology
FDA approves certolizumab label update for pregnancy, breastfeeding
MDedge Rheumatology
Axial SpA disease activity remains mostly stable throughout pregnancy
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: Why most heart failure may be preventable
MDedge Rheumatology
Reassurance for women taking certolizumab during pregnancy
MDedge Rheumatology