Feature

In rheumatology, biosimilars are flatlining. Why?


 

FROM ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY


The FDA is currently using postmarketing pharmacovigilance to monitor biosimilar performance in the real world, and a recent systematic review “should provide some reassurance,” wrote Dr. Yazdany, citing the study, which looked at 14,000 patients who had a total of 14 disease indications for biosimilar use. The 90-article review largely found no differences in safety, efficacy, or immunogenicity between originators and their biosimilars. Dr. Yazdany recommended greater openness to incorporating the European experience in the FDA’s ongoing reassessment.

A further way forward can come through tackling the patent thicket with the proposed bipartisan Biologic Patent Transparency Act, which would require publication of biologic patents in a one-stop publicly searchable database. Going further with legislation to address anticompetitive activity by pharmaceutical companies could shorten the runway to biosimilar launching considerably, she noted.

The complicated landscape of PBMs and rebates affects many sectors of health care, and new policy efforts are needed here as well, she said. Reimbursement strategies – and much-needed continuing medical education – can both ease prescriber unfamiliarity with biosimilars and provide incentives for their use, she concluded.

Dr. Kim concurred that change is needed before the United States is likely to reap significant economic benefit from biosimilars. “The uptake of biosimilars and their impact on overall health care cost needs to be reevaluated when we have more biosimilars available in the next 3-4 years. However, for now, it appears that substantial savings achieved in some European countries – for example, Denmark – may not be possible without systemic reform of the U.S. pharmaceutical market,” she said.

Dr. Yazdany is supported by the Alice Betts Endowed Chair in Arthritis Research, the Russel/Engleman Research Center at the University of California, San Francisco, and the National Institutes of Health. She has received independent research grants from Pfizer and Genentech and research consulting fees from Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca.

Dr. Kim’s study was supported by the division of pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacoeconomics, department of medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Arnold Ventures. Dr. Kim has received research grants to Brigham and Women’s Hospital from Pfizer, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Roche.

SOURCES: Kim SC et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Jan 13. doi: 10.1002/art.41201; Yazdany J. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Jan 10. doi: 10.1002/art.41203.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Certolizumab safety profile varies widely across indications
MDedge Rheumatology
FDA approves infliximab-axxq for numerous indications
MDedge Rheumatology
Perioperative antirheumatic drug use does not impact postsurgery infection rate in RA patients
MDedge Rheumatology
Repeat LTBI testing best in patients taking biologics with new risk factors
MDedge Rheumatology
Switch to biologic for RA more about prescribers than patients
MDedge Rheumatology
Dose escalation of biosimilar infliximab for RA patients deemed cost effective, to a point
MDedge Rheumatology
Nearly 25% of U.S. adults take an obesogenic prescription drug
MDedge Rheumatology
Ideal management of RA in pregnancy improves outcomes
MDedge Rheumatology
Value analysis of JAK inhibitors for RA hampered by limited data
MDedge Rheumatology
What happens to clinically suspected arthralgia patients without RA?
MDedge Rheumatology