Conference Coverage

Slow taper off antimalarial is best to avoid lupus flare during remission


 

FROM ACR 2020

“But we would like to look into the different forms of immunosuppression,” she added, “just to see if that made any difference.”

Withdrawing hydroxychloroquine in older patients

Older patients with SLE who discontinue their use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are also not at increased risk of disease flare, according to a retrospective chart review from rheumatologists Ruth Fernandez-Ruiz, MD , and Peter M. Izmirly, MD , of New York University (Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22:191. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02282-0 ).

“We wanted to focus on older patients who may have a lower risk of flaring and a higher risk of side effects from the drug,” Dr. Fernandez-Ruiz said in an interview.

The doctors embarked on the study after noticing eye and heart toxicities in certain older patients. They matched 26 lupus patients who had been on HCQ for at least 5 years before discontinuing the drug with 32 control patients who remained on HCQ, ultimately finding that withdrawal had no effect on their risk of lupus flares within a year.

“After starting a drug, the second question most people ask, after ‘What are the side effects?’ is ‘How long do I have to be on this?’ ” Dr. Izmirly said in an interview. “These patients are having side effects associated with long-term HCQ use. And we were noticing that, after you stop the drug, despite what you’re taught, they weren’t flaring.”

Dr. Peter M. Izmirly

Only five patients from each group – 19.2% of the withdrawal group and 15.6% of the continuation group – experienced a flare (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.31-5.30; P = .73). Most of the flares were cutaneous and musculoskeletal in nature, and no severe flares occurred in either group.

“On each side, the overall flare rate was not that high, and they were all relatively mild,” Dr. Izmirly said.

The two doctors acknowledged their study’s smaller sample size, compared with the study by Papachristos and colleagues, along with the advanced age of their patient population, which limits the generalizability of their findings. “We selected patients who had a very low disease activity to begin with, and who were older,” Dr. Fernandez-Ruiz noted.

That said, they reinforced the scarcity of existing research on this subset of lupus patients, one that will only continue to grow.

“Older [patients with] lupus,” Dr. Izmirly said, are “an understudied demographic.”

One of the authors of the study presented at ACR 2020 acknowledged receiving research support and consulting fees from various pharmaceutical companies. The HCQ study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; its authors declared no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Papachristos D et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(suppl 10). Abstract 0983 .

Pages

Recommended Reading

Switching to riociguat effective for some patients with PAH not at treatment goal
MDedge Rheumatology
ASSET extension supports abatacept as treatment for diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis
MDedge Rheumatology
COVID-19–related HCQ shortages affected rheumatology patients worldwide
MDedge Rheumatology
Transcutaneous VNS on the ear shows positive effects in lupus pilot trial
MDedge Rheumatology
Lupus-specific predictors for CVD described in Black patients
MDedge Rheumatology
COVID-19 risks in rheumatic disease remain unclear
MDedge Rheumatology
Pregnancy can be safe with interstitial lung disease
MDedge Rheumatology
Methotrexate users need tuberculosis tests in high-TB areas
MDedge Rheumatology
Sjögren’s symptom clusters may identify treatment options
MDedge Rheumatology
Chronic inflammatory diseases vary widely in CHD risk 
MDedge Rheumatology