Guidelines

Kawasaki disease guideline highlights rheumatology angles


 

FROM ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY

Update incorporates emerging evidence

Potential barriers to implementing the guideline in practice include the challenge of weaning doctors from practices that are habitual in medicine, Dr. Gorelik said. “One of these is the use of high-dose aspirin for Kawasaki disease; a number of studies have shown over the past decade or more that high-dose aspirin has no greater effect than lower-dose aspirin for Kawasaki disease. Despite all of these studies, the use of high-dose aspirin continued. High-dose aspirin for Kawasaki disease was used in the era prior to use of IVIg as an anti-inflammatory agent. However, it has poor efficacy in this regard, and the true benefit for aspirin is for anticoagulation for patients at risk of a clot, and this is just as effective in lower doses. Expressing this in a guideline could help to change practices by helping physicians understand not only what they are guided to do, but why.”

Additional research is needed to better identify high-risk patients in non-Japanese populations, he noted. “While studies from Japan suggest that higher-risk patients can be identified based on various parameters, these have not been well replicated in non-Japanese populations. Good research that identifies which patients may be more at risk in other populations would be helpful to more precisely target high-risk therapy.”

Other research needs include a clearer understanding of the best therapies for refractory patients, Dr. Gorelik said. “One area of the most difficulty was determining whether patients with refractory disease should have repeated IVIg or a switch to glucocorticoids and biologic agents. Some of this research is underway, and some was published just as these guidelines were being drawn, and this particular area is one that is likely to change significantly. While currently we recommend a repeated dose of IVIg, it is likely that over the very near term, the use of repeated IVIg in KD will be curtailed” because of concerns such as the relatively high rate of hemolysis. Research to identify which therapy has a noninferior effect with a superior risk profile is needed; such research “will likely result in a future iteration of these guidelines specifically related to this question,” he concluded.

The KD guideline is the final companion to three additional ACR/VF vasculitis guidelines that were released in July 2021. The guideline research received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Step right up, folks, for a public dissection
MDedge Rheumatology
Penicillin slows latent rheumatic heart disease progression
MDedge Rheumatology
COVID-19 linked to increased diabetes risk in youth
MDedge Rheumatology
COVID-vaccine myocarditis: Rare, mild, and usually in young men
MDedge Rheumatology
Absolute increase in Kawasaki CV risk remains small in long-term follow-up
MDedge Rheumatology
Agreement reached for research definition of ‘long COVID’ in children and young people
MDedge Rheumatology
FDA delays action on Pfizer vaccine for kids under 5
MDedge Rheumatology
Eighteen-year study shows inconsistencies in treating, classifying JIA
MDedge Rheumatology
New MIS-C guidance addresses diagnostic challenges, cardiac care
MDedge Rheumatology
New JIA guidelines emphasize earlier DMARD use
MDedge Rheumatology