From the Journals

Medical Cannabis for Chronic Pain Tied to Arrhythmia Risk


 

TOPLINE:

Adults using medical cannabis for chronic pain, especially those with cancer or cardiometabolic disease, have a slightly elevated risk of developing arrhythmia, mainly atrial fibrillation/flutter, a Danish registry study suggested. Cannabis use has been associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, but data on CV side effects with use of medical cannabis for chronic pain are limited.

METHODOLOGY:

  • To investigate, researchers identified 5391 patients with chronic pain (median age 59; 63% women) initiating first-time treatment with medical cannabis during 2018-2021 and matched them (1:5) to 26,941 control patients on age, sex, chronic pain diagnosis, and concomitant use of other noncannabis pain medication.
  • They calculated and compared absolute risks for first-time arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation/flutter, conduction disorders, paroxysmal tachycardias, and ventricular arrhythmias) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between groups.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Within 180 days, 42 medical cannabis users and 107 control participants developed arrhythmia, most commonly atrial fibrillation/flutter.
  • Medical cannabis users had a slightly elevated risk for new-onset arrhythmia compared with nonusers (180-day absolute risk, 0.8% vs 0.4%).
  • The 180-day risk ratio with cannabis use was 2.07 (95% CI, 1.34-2.80), and the 1-year risk ratio was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.00-1.73).
  • Adults with cancer or cardiometabolic disease had the highest risk for arrhythmia with cannabis use (180-day absolute risk difference, 1.1% and 0.8%). There was no significant association between medical cannabis use and ACS risk.

IN PRACTICE:

“With the investigated cohort’s low age and low prevalence of comorbidity in mind, the notable relative risk increase of new-onset arrhythmia, mainly driven by atrial fibrillation/flutter, could be a reason for concern, albeit the absolute risks in this study population were modest,” the authors wrote.

“Medical cannabis may not be a ‘one-size-fits-all’ therapeutic option for certain medical conditions and should be contextualized based on patient comorbidities and potential vulnerability to side effects,” added the author of an editorial.

SOURCE:

The study, led by Anders Holt, MD, Copenhagen University and Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark, was published online on January 11, 2024, in the European Heart Journal, with an editorial by Robert Page II, PharmD, MSPH, University of Colorado, Aurora.

LIMITATIONS:

Residual confounding is possible. The registers lack information on disease severity, clinical measures, blood tests, and lifestyle factors. The route of cannabis administration was not known.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was funded by external and independent medical research grants. Holt had no relevant disclosures. Some coauthors reported research grants and speakers’ fees from various drug companies.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Cardiac arrest survival lower in COVID-19 inpatients
MDedge Rheumatology
Cannabis for pain linked to slight risk for arrhythmia
MDedge Rheumatology
Rivaroxaban outmatched by VKAs for AFib in rheumatic heart disease
MDedge Rheumatology
Novel head-up CPR position raises odds of survival of out-of-hospital heart attacks
MDedge Rheumatology
New deep dive into Paxlovid interactions with CVD meds
MDedge Rheumatology
Five thoughts on the Damar Hamlin collapse
MDedge Rheumatology
Three wild technologies about to change health care
MDedge Rheumatology
FREEDOM COVID: Full-dose anticoagulation cut mortality but missed primary endpoint
MDedge Rheumatology
EMA warns that omega-3-acid ethyl esters may cause AFib
MDedge Rheumatology
Pregnancy in rheumatic disease quadruples risk of cardiovascular events
MDedge Rheumatology