Clinical Review

Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Hip and Knee

Author and Disclosure Information

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but devastating complication of arthroplasty. Research has been dedicated to minimizing the incidence of PJI, leading to the development of a comprehensive perioperative approach. Multiple preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors can increase patient risk. From medical management and skin sterilization to wound sterility and blood management, multiple issues must be considered in a well-rounded prevention protocol. In this literature review, we consolidate the current information that orthopedic surgeons can use to minimize PJI after total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.


 

References

Nearly 2% of patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) develop a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) within 20 years of surgery, and 41% of these infections occur within the first 2 years.1 PJI is the most common cause of TKA failure and the third leading complication of THA.2 The estimated total hospital cost of treating PJI increased from $320 million in 2001 to $566 million in 2009, which can be extrapolated to $1.62 billion in 2020.3 By 2030, the projected increase in demand for TKA and THA will be 673% and 174% of what it was in 2005, respectively.4 Treatment of PJI of the knee is estimated to cost 3 to 4 times more than a primary TKA, and the cost of revision THA for PJI is almost $6000 more than that of revision TKA for PJI.3

In this article, we review the numerous preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative methods of decreasing PJI incidence after total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

Preoperative Risk Prevention

Medical Comorbidities

Preoperative medical optimization is a key element in PJI prevention (Table 1). An American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score of 3 or more has been associated with doubled risk for surgical site infections (SSIs) after THA.5 Autoimmune conditions confer a particularly higher risk. In a retrospective double-cohort study of 924 subjects, Bongartz and colleagues6 found that, compared with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis tripled the risk of PJI. Small case series originally suggested a higher risk of PJI in patients with psoriasis,7,8 but more recent studies have contradicted that finding.9,10 Nevertheless, psoriatic plaques have elevated bacterial counts,11 and planned incisions should circumvent these areas.

Diabetes mellitus is a clear risk factor for PJI.12-16 Regarding whether preoperative glucose control affects risk, findings have been mixed. Mraovic and colleagues17 showed preoperative hyperglycemia to be an independent risk factor; Jämsen and colleagues,15 in a single-center analysis of more than 7000 TJAs, suggested preoperative blood glucose levels were not independently associated with PJI; and Iorio and colleagues16 found no association between surgical infections and hemoglobin A1c levels.

TJA incidence is higher in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) than in the general population.18 Dialysis users have a post-THA PJI rate as high as 13% to 19%.19,20 Early clinical data suggested that outcomes are improved in dialysis users who undergo renal transplant, but this finding recently has been questioned.19,21 Deegan and colleagues22 found an increased PJA rate of 3.5% even in low-level CKD (stage 1, 2, or 3), but this may be confounded by the increased association of CKD with other PJI-predisposing comorbidities.

Given a higher incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) among patients with PJI, some surgeons think UTIs predispose to PJIs by hematogenous seeding.12,23,24 Symptomatic UTIs should be cleared before surgery and confirmed on urinalysis. Obstructive symptoms should prompt urologic evaluation. As asymptomatic pyuria and bacteriuria (colony counts, >1 × 105/mL) do not predispose to PJI, patients without symptoms do not require intervention.25,26 Past history of malignancy may also have a role in PJI. In a case-control study of the Mayo Clinic arthroplasty experience from 1969 to 1991, Berbari and colleagues1 found an association between malignancy and PJI (odds ratio, 2.4). They theorized the immunosuppressive effects of cancer treatment might be responsible for this increased risk.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Choosing a Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Surgeon Influence Reigns Supreme
MDedge Surgery
Shoulder Arthroplasty: Disposition and Perioperative Outcomes in Patients With and Without Rheumatoid Arthritis
MDedge Surgery
Maximizing Efficiency in the Operating Room for Total Joint Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
The Effect of Humeral Inclination on Range of Motion in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
MDedge Surgery
AAOS Introduces New Apps for Patient Education
MDedge Surgery
Many Patients Who Take Opioids Before Arthroplasty Continue to Take Them for Months Afterwards
MDedge Surgery
New “Bone Balance” Index Can Predict Women’s Risk for Rapid Bone Loss
MDedge Surgery
Stem Cells in Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Guide for the General Orthopedist
MDedge Surgery
The Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction
MDedge Surgery
Clinical Outcomes of Anatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Young, Active Population
MDedge Surgery