Original Research

Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Buried Fixation Technique Using Headless Compression Screws for the Treatment of Patella Fractures

Author and Disclosure Information

TAKE-HOME POINTS

  • Symptomatic implant removal rates are high after patella fixation with standard techniques.
  • Novel buried technique may address the issue of symptomatic implants and is an attractive alternative.
  • Both techniques withstand physiologic loads, but the buried technique had overall increased gapping and lower load to failure.
  • The significance of these inferior results in clinical and functional settings has not been established.
  • Long-term functional outcome studies will delineate the utility of the proposed new construct.


 

References

ABSTRACT

The traditional technique for patella fracture fixation utilizes prominent hardware. Prominent hardware use, however, results in a high rate of reoperation for symptomatic implant removal. This biomechanical study evaluates the effectiveness of a novel patella fixation technique that minimizes implant prominence.

Patellar transverse osteotomies were created in 13 pairs of cadaveric knees. Paired knees were assigned to either standard fixation (SF) using cannulated partially threaded screws and stainless steel wire tension band, or buried fixation (BF) using headless compression screws with a No. 2 FiberWire tension band and a No. 5 FiberWire cerclage suture. Quadriceps tendons were cyclically loaded to full extension followed by load to failure. The gap across the fracture site, stiffness, and load to failure were measured.

The differences in stiffness and load to failure between the 2 groups were not statistically significant. During cyclic loading, significantly greater gapping was observed across the fracture site in the BF group compared with SF group (P < .05).

Both constructs failed under loads that exceeded typical loads experienced during the postoperative rehabilitation period. Nevertheless, the BF technique demonstrated larger gap formation and a reduced load to failure than the SF technique. Further clinical studies are therefore underway to determine whether the use of constructs with decreased stability but increased patient comfort could improve clinical outcomes and reduce reoperation rates.

Continue to: Patella fractures are common...

Pages

Recommended Reading

Accuracy of Distal Femoral Valgus Deformity Correction: Fixator-Assisted Nailing vs Fixator-Assisted Locked Plating
MDedge Surgery
Free Composite Serratus Anterior-Latissimus-Rib Flaps for Acute One-Stage Reconstruction of Gustilo IIIB Tibia Fractures
MDedge Surgery
Continuous Cryotherapy vs Ice Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Randomized Control Trial
MDedge Surgery
Multi-Modal Pain Control in Ambulatory Hand Surgery
MDedge Surgery
Open vs Percutaneous vs Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Updated Systematic Review
MDedge Surgery
Rheumatoid Arthritis vs Osteoarthritis: Comparison of Demographics and Trends of Joint Replacement Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample
MDedge Surgery
Reasons for Readmission Following Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Study Examining Utilization, Adverse Events, Length of Stay, and Cost
MDedge Surgery
Minimum 5-Year Follow-up of Articular Surface Replacement Acetabular Components Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Outcomes After Peripheral Nerve Block in Hip Arthroscopy
MDedge Surgery