From the Journals

Five Key Measures to Ensure a Quality Colonoscopy


 

Changes to the Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)

The ADR remains a priority indicator in the update, albeit with changes.

To keep the ADR measurement consistent with current screening guidelines, the task force now recommends that the ADR be measured starting at age 45 rather than 50 years.

“ADR plays a critical role in evaluating the performance of the colonoscopists,” task force lead Douglas K. Rex, MD, a gastroenterologist at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, said in the statement.

“It is recommended that ADR calculations include screening, surveillance, and diagnostic colonoscopy but exclude indications of a positive noncolonoscopy screening test and therapeutic procedures for resection or treatment of known neoplasia, genetic cancer syndromes, and inflammatory bowel disease,” Dr. Rex explained.

Dr. Douglas K. Rex, emeritus professor of medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis

Dr. Douglas K. Rex

The task force recommends a minimum ADR threshold of 35% (40% in men and 30% in women) and that colonoscopists with ADRs below 35% “undertake remedial measures to improve and to achieve acceptable performance.”

Additional Priorities

The cecal intubation rate (CIR) — the percentage of patients undergoing colonoscopy with intact colons who have full intubation of the cecum with photo documentation of cecal landmarks — remains a priority quality indicator and has a performance target ≥ 95%.

“A trained colonoscopist should achieve a high CIR with a very high level of safety,” the task force wrote. “Low CIRs have been associated with higher PCCRC [postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer] rates.”

The final priority indicator is the rate of using recommended screening and surveillance intervals, which carries a performance target ≥ 90%.

“We recommend that quality improvement efforts initially focus on high-priority indicators and then progress to other indicators once it is ascertained that endoscopists are performing above recommended thresholds, either at baseline or after corrective interventions,” the task force wrote.

“The priority indicators are absolutely important for practices to implement,” Dr. Gellad said.

“There is compelling evidence that these measures are correlated with clinically important outcomes, particularly ADR,” he added. “Many practices already capture this data, and the changes in ADR calculation make measurement less burdensome. Hopefully, this will encourage more practices to collect and report these measures.”

Dr. Rex is a consultant for Olympus, Boston Scientific, Braintree Laboratories, Norgine, GI Supply, Medtronic, and Acacia Pharmaceuticals; receives research support from Olympus, Medivators, Erbe USA, and Braintree Laboratories; and is a shareholder in Satisfai Health. Dr. Shaheen had no relevant disclosures. Dr. Gellad has consulted for Merck & Co. and Novo Nordisk and is a cofounder of Higgs Boson.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Clip closure reduced bleeding after large lesion resection
MDedge Surgery
New practice guideline: CRC screening isn’t necessary for low-risk patients aged 50-75 years
MDedge Surgery
Greater weight loss with sleeve gastroplasty than with diet therapy
MDedge Surgery
U.S. Multi-Society Task Force publishes polypectomy guidance
MDedge Surgery
CRC task force updates colonoscopy follow-up guidance
MDedge Surgery
Postapproval data confirm risks with intragastric balloons
MDedge Surgery
Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions appears safe and effective
MDedge Surgery
Real-world evidence seen for metal stents in biliary strictures
MDedge Surgery
FDA Emphasizes Alternative Device Sterilization Strategies
MDedge Surgery
Cold Snare Resection Safe for Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps
MDedge Surgery