Latest News

Fibroids: Medical Therapy Not Hysterectomy Should Be First Treatment Choice Interventional Options Case Study


 

FROM NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Hysterectomy

Minimally invasive hysterectomy is recommended. Drawbacks to hysterectomy include perioperative risk and concomitant oophorectomy, which was common until the early 2000s when large cohort studies showed elevated risks of death, cardiovascular disease, dementia, and other illnesses compared with hysterectomy plus ovarian conservation. Oophorectomy but not hysterectomy rates have since decreased.

Still needing study, according to Laughlin-Tommaso are the underlying reasons for health disparities in fibroids, especially among Black and Latina individuals. “Some studies have found associations with vitamin D deficiency and with stress and racism,” she said.

Looking ahead, the authors stressed the need for a fibroid risk-prediction model, a staging system, and large randomized trials of treatment effectiveness. Also needed are methods for primary and secondary prevention. “Earlier screening and medical treatment in primary care settings could potentially minimize morbidity and the incidence of unnecessary hysterectomies, and primary care–based screening trials are warranted,” they wrote.

In addition to procedural illustrations the practice document includes a vignette of a 33-year-old never-pregnant Black woman (but desiring motherhood) with heavy menstrual bleeding, abdominal bloating, and non–iron deficiency anemia. Evaluation for thalassemia and sickle cell anemia is negative, but ultrasonography reveals an enlarged uterus with multiple fibroids and normal ovaries.

In line with the clinical review, the authors prescribe oral GnRH agonist combination therapy, plus iron and multivitamin supplementation, and recommend annual reassessment — earlier if pregnancy is desired or if symptoms escalate. Since the patient prioritizes fertility, hysterectomy would be appropriate only if she had biopsy-proven cancer.

The authors received no external funding for this practice paper, but both have funding from the National Institutes of Health for fibroid research. Laughlin-Tommaso reported royalties from UpToDate. Stewart reported research support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and speaking, data-monitoring, and consulting fees for various private companies, including AbbVie, Anylam Pharmaceuticals, ASKA Pharma, and Myovant Sciences. She holds a patent on treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding and has been involved in CME for various medical educational agencies. Hurtado and Ascher-Walsh had no relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

The removal of the multiple-kilogram uterus using MIGSs
MDedge Surgery
In hysterectomy, consider wider risks of ovary removal
MDedge Surgery
Endometriosis, surgical approach impact risk of bowel injury in hysterectomy
MDedge Surgery
FDA supports robotic device as hysterectomy helper
MDedge Surgery
Models stratify hysterectomy risk with benign conditions
MDedge Surgery
Docs used permanent, not temporary stitches; lawsuits result
MDedge Surgery
For young people on Medicare, a hysterectomy sometimes is more affordable than birth control
MDedge Surgery
Premenopausal women benefit from ovarian conservation with benign hysterectomies
MDedge Surgery
Surgical de-escalation passes clinical test in low-risk cervical cancer
MDedge Surgery
Early hysterectomy linked to higher CVD, stroke risk
MDedge Surgery