Keith A. Choate, MD, PhD

To the Editor:

Focal palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival keratosis (FPGK)(Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [OMIM] 148730) is a rare autosomal-dominant syndrome featuring focal, pressure-related, painful palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival hyperkeratosis presenting as leukokeratosis. Focal palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival keratosis was first defined by Gorlin¹ in 1976. Since then, only a few cases have been reported, but no causative mutations have been identified.²

Focal pressure-related palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) and oral hyperkeratosis also are seen in pachyonychia congenita (PC)(OMIM 167200, 615726, 615728, 167210), a rare autosomal-dominant disorder of keratinization characterized by PPK and nail dystrophy. Patients with PC often present with plantar pain; more variable features include oral leukokeratosis, follicular hyperkeratosis, pilosebaceous and epidermal inclusion cysts, hoarseness, hyperhidrosis, and natal teeth. Pachyonychia congenita is caused by mutation in keratin genes KRT6A, KRT6B, KRT16, or KRT17.

Focal palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival keratosis as well as PC are distinct from other forms of PPK with gingival involvement such as Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome (OMIM 245000) and Olmsted syndrome (OMIM 614594). Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder caused by mutations in the cathepsin C, CTSC, gene that exhibits erythematous, diffuse, transgradient PPK and early severe periodontitis. Olmsted syndrome is caused by autosomal-dominant gene mutations in transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 3, TRPV3, and is characterized by severe bilateral transgradient PPK with leukoplakia of the tongue and buccal mucosa but also usually exhibits marked periorificial keratotic plaques, which facilitate exclusion of other phenotypically similar syndromes.³

Despite the common features of FPGK and PC, they are considered distinct disorders due to absence of nail changes in FPGK and no prior evidence of a common genetic cause. We present a patient with familial FPGK found by whole exome sequencing to be caused by a mutation in KRT16.

The proband was a 57-year-old man born to unrelated parents (Figure 1). He had no skin problems at birth, and his development was normal. He had painful focal keratoderma since childhood that were most prominent at pressure points on the soles and toes (Figure 2A), in addition to gingival hyperkeratosis and oral leukokeratosis (Figure 2B). He had no associated abnormalities of the skin, hair, or teeth and no nail findings (Figure 2C). He reported that his father and 2 of his 3 sisters were affected with similar symptoms. A punch biopsy of the right fifth toe was consistent with verrucous epidermal hyperplasia with perinuclear keratinization in the spinous layer (Figure 3A). A gingival biopsy showed perinuclear eosinophilic globules and basophilic stranding in the cytoplasm (Figure 3B). His older sister had more severe and painful focal keratoderma of the soles, punctate keratoderma of the palms, gingival hyperkeratosis, and leukokeratosis of the tongue.

Whole exome sequencing of the proband revealed a heterozygous missense mutation in KRT16 (c.380G>A, p.R127H, rs57424749). Sanger sequencing confirmed this mutation and showed that it was heterozygous in both of his affected sisters and absent in his unaffected niece (Figure 1). The patient was treated with topical and systemic retinoids, keratolytics, and mechanical removal to moderate effect, with noted improvement in the appearance and associated pain of the plantar keratoderma.

Phenotypic heterogeneity is common in PC, though PC due to KRT6A mutations demonstrates more severe nail disease with oral lesions, cysts, and follicular hyperkeratosis, while PC caused by KRT16 mutations generally presents with more extensive and painful PPK.⁴KRT16 mutations affecting p.R127 are frequent causes of PC, and genotype-phenotype correlations have been observed. Individuals with p.R127P mutations exhibit more severe disease with earlier age of onset, more extensive nail involvement and oral leukokeratosis, and greater impact on daily quality of life than in individuals with p.R127C mutations.⁵ Cases of PC with KRT16 p.R127S and p.R127G mutations also have been observed. The KRT16 c.380G>A, p.R127H mutation we documented has been reported in one kindred with PC who presented with PPK, oral leukokeratosis, toenail thickening, and pilosebaceous and follicular hyperkeratosis.⁶

Although patients with FPGK lack the thickening of fingernails and/or toenails considered a defining feature of PC, the disorders otherwise are phenotypically similar, suggesting the possibility of common pathogenesis. One linkage study of familial FPGK excluded genetic intervals containing type I and type II keratins but was limited to a single small kindred.² This study and our data together suggest that, similar to PC, there are multiple genes in which mutations cause FPGK.

Murine Krt16 knockouts show distinct phenotypes depending on the mouse strain in which they are propagated, ranging from perinatal lethality to differences in the severity of oral and PPK lesions.⁷ These observations provide evidence that additional genetic variants contribute to Krt16 phenotypes in mice and suggest the same could be true for humans.

We propose that some cases of FPGK are due to mutations in KRT16 and thus share a genetic pathogenesis with PC, underscoring the utility of whole exome sequencing in providing genetic diagnoses for disorders that are genetically and clinically heterogeneous. Further biologic investigation of phenotypes caused by KRT16 mutation may reveal respective contributions of additional genetic variation and environmental effects to the variable clinical presentations.

To the Editor:

Focal palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival keratosis (FPGK)(Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [OMIM] 148730) is a rare autosomal-dominant syndrome featuring focal, pressure-related, painful palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival hyperkeratosis presenting as leukokeratosis. Focal palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival keratosis was first defined by Gorlin¹ in 1976. Since then, only a few cases have been reported, but no causative mutations have been identified.²

Focal pressure-related palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) and oral hyperkeratosis also are seen in pachyonychia congenita (PC)(OMIM 167200, 615726, 615728, 167210), a rare autosomal-dominant disorder of keratinization characterized by PPK and nail dystrophy. Patients with PC often present with plantar pain; more variable features include oral leukokeratosis, follicular hyperkeratosis, pilosebaceous and epidermal inclusion cysts, hoarseness, hyperhidrosis, and natal teeth. Pachyonychia congenita is caused by mutation in keratin genes KRT6A, KRT6B, KRT16, or KRT17.

Focal palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival keratosis as well as PC are distinct from other forms of PPK with gingival involvement such as Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome (OMIM 245000) and Olmsted syndrome (OMIM 614594). Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder caused by mutations in the cathepsin C, CTSC, gene that exhibits erythematous, diffuse, transgradient PPK and early severe periodontitis. Olmsted syndrome is caused by autosomal-dominant gene mutations in transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 3, TRPV3, and is characterized by severe bilateral transgradient PPK with leukoplakia of the tongue and buccal mucosa but also usually exhibits marked periorificial keratotic plaques, which facilitate exclusion of other phenotypically similar syndromes.³

Despite the common features of FPGK and PC, they are considered distinct disorders due to absence of nail changes in FPGK and no prior evidence of a common genetic cause. We present a patient with familial FPGK found by whole exome sequencing to be caused by a mutation in KRT16.

The proband was a 57-year-old man born to unrelated parents (Figure 1). He had no skin problems at birth, and his development was normal. He had painful focal keratoderma since childhood that were most prominent at pressure points on the soles and toes (Figure 2A), in addition to gingival hyperkeratosis and oral leukokeratosis (Figure 2B). He had no associated abnormalities of the skin, hair, or teeth and no nail findings (Figure 2C). He reported that his father and 2 of his 3 sisters were affected with similar symptoms. A punch biopsy of the right fifth toe was consistent with verrucous epidermal hyperplasia with perinuclear keratinization in the spinous layer (Figure 3A). A gingival biopsy showed perinuclear eosinophilic globules and basophilic stranding in the cytoplasm (Figure 3B). His older sister had more severe and painful focal keratoderma of the soles, punctate keratoderma of the palms, gingival hyperkeratosis, and leukokeratosis of the tongue.

Whole exome sequencing of the proband revealed a heterozygous missense mutation in KRT16 (c.380G>A, p.R127H, rs57424749). Sanger sequencing confirmed this mutation and showed that it was heterozygous in both of his affected sisters and absent in his unaffected niece (Figure 1). The patient was treated with topical and systemic retinoids, keratolytics, and mechanical removal to moderate effect, with noted improvement in the appearance and associated pain of the plantar keratoderma.

Phenotypic heterogeneity is common in PC, though PC due to KRT6A mutations demonstrates more severe nail disease with oral lesions, cysts, and follicular hyperkeratosis, while PC caused by KRT16 mutations generally presents with more extensive and painful PPK.⁴KRT16 mutations affecting p.R127 are frequent causes of PC, and genotype-phenotype correlations have been observed. Individuals with p.R127P mutations exhibit more severe disease with earlier age of onset, more extensive nail involvement and oral leukokeratosis, and greater impact on daily quality of life than in individuals with p.R127C mutations.⁵ Cases of PC with KRT16 p.R127S and p.R127G mutations also have been observed. The KRT16 c.380G>A, p.R127H mutation we documented has been reported in one kindred with PC who presented with PPK, oral leukokeratosis, toenail thickening, and pilosebaceous and follicular hyperkeratosis.⁶

Although patients with FPGK lack the thickening of fingernails and/or toenails considered a defining feature of PC, the disorders otherwise are phenotypically similar, suggesting the possibility of common pathogenesis. One linkage study of familial FPGK excluded genetic intervals containing type I and type II keratins but was limited to a single small kindred.² This study and our data together suggest that, similar to PC, there are multiple genes in which mutations cause FPGK.

Murine Krt16 knockouts show distinct phenotypes depending on the mouse strain in which they are propagated, ranging from perinatal lethality to differences in the severity of oral and PPK lesions.⁷ These observations provide evidence that additional genetic variants contribute to Krt16 phenotypes in mice and suggest the same could be true for humans.

We propose that some cases of FPGK are due to mutations in KRT16 and thus share a genetic pathogenesis with PC, underscoring the utility of whole exome sequencing in providing genetic diagnoses for disorders that are genetically and clinically heterogeneous. Further biologic investigation of phenotypes caused by KRT16 mutation may reveal respective contributions of additional genetic variation and environmental effects to the variable clinical presentations.

To the Editor:

Focal palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival keratosis (FPGK)(Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [OMIM] 148730) is a rare autosomal-dominant syndrome featuring focal, pressure-related, painful palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival hyperkeratosis presenting as leukokeratosis. Focal palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival keratosis was first defined by Gorlin¹ in 1976. Since then, only a few cases have been reported, but no causative mutations have been identified.²

Focal pressure-related palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) and oral hyperkeratosis also are seen in pachyonychia congenita (PC)(OMIM 167200, 615726, 615728, 167210), a rare autosomal-dominant disorder of keratinization characterized by PPK and nail dystrophy. Patients with PC often present with plantar pain; more variable features include oral leukokeratosis, follicular hyperkeratosis, pilosebaceous and epidermal inclusion cysts, hoarseness, hyperhidrosis, and natal teeth. Pachyonychia congenita is caused by mutation in keratin genes KRT6A, KRT6B, KRT16, or KRT17.

Focal palmoplantar keratoderma and gingival keratosis as well as PC are distinct from other forms of PPK with gingival involvement such as Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome (OMIM 245000) and Olmsted syndrome (OMIM 614594). Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder caused by mutations in the cathepsin C, CTSC, gene that exhibits erythematous, diffuse, transgradient PPK and early severe periodontitis. Olmsted syndrome is caused by autosomal-dominant gene mutations in transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 3, TRPV3, and is characterized by severe bilateral transgradient PPK with leukoplakia of the tongue and buccal mucosa but also usually exhibits marked periorificial keratotic plaques, which facilitate exclusion of other phenotypically similar syndromes.³

Despite the common features of FPGK and PC, they are considered distinct disorders due to absence of nail changes in FPGK and no prior evidence of a common genetic cause. We present a patient with familial FPGK found by whole exome sequencing to be caused by a mutation in KRT16.

The proband was a 57-year-old man born to unrelated parents (Figure 1). He had no skin problems at birth, and his development was normal. He had painful focal keratoderma since childhood that were most prominent at pressure points on the soles and toes (Figure 2A), in addition to gingival hyperkeratosis and oral leukokeratosis (Figure 2B). He had no associated abnormalities of the skin, hair, or teeth and no nail findings (Figure 2C). He reported that his father and 2 of his 3 sisters were affected with similar symptoms. A punch biopsy of the right fifth toe was consistent with verrucous epidermal hyperplasia with perinuclear keratinization in the spinous layer (Figure 3A). A gingival biopsy showed perinuclear eosinophilic globules and basophilic stranding in the cytoplasm (Figure 3B). His older sister had more severe and painful focal keratoderma of the soles, punctate keratoderma of the palms, gingival hyperkeratosis, and leukokeratosis of the tongue.

Whole exome sequencing of the proband revealed a heterozygous missense mutation in KRT16 (c.380G>A, p.R127H, rs57424749). Sanger sequencing confirmed this mutation and showed that it was heterozygous in both of his affected sisters and absent in his unaffected niece (Figure 1). The patient was treated with topical and systemic retinoids, keratolytics, and mechanical removal to moderate effect, with noted improvement in the appearance and associated pain of the plantar keratoderma.

Phenotypic heterogeneity is common in PC, though PC due to KRT6A mutations demonstrates more severe nail disease with oral lesions, cysts, and follicular hyperkeratosis, while PC caused by KRT16 mutations generally presents with more extensive and painful PPK.⁴KRT16 mutations affecting p.R127 are frequent causes of PC, and genotype-phenotype correlations have been observed. Individuals with p.R127P mutations exhibit more severe disease with earlier age of onset, more extensive nail involvement and oral leukokeratosis, and greater impact on daily quality of life than in individuals with p.R127C mutations.⁵ Cases of PC with KRT16 p.R127S and p.R127G mutations also have been observed. The KRT16 c.380G>A, p.R127H mutation we documented has been reported in one kindred with PC who presented with PPK, oral leukokeratosis, toenail thickening, and pilosebaceous and follicular hyperkeratosis.⁶

Although patients with FPGK lack the thickening of fingernails and/or toenails considered a defining feature of PC, the disorders otherwise are phenotypically similar, suggesting the possibility of common pathogenesis. One linkage study of familial FPGK excluded genetic intervals containing type I and type II keratins but was limited to a single small kindred.² This study and our data together suggest that, similar to PC, there are multiple genes in which mutations cause FPGK.

Murine Krt16 knockouts show distinct phenotypes depending on the mouse strain in which they are propagated, ranging from perinatal lethality to differences in the severity of oral and PPK lesions.⁷ These observations provide evidence that additional genetic variants contribute to Krt16 phenotypes in mice and suggest the same could be true for humans.

We propose that some cases of FPGK are due to mutations in KRT16 and thus share a genetic pathogenesis with PC, underscoring the utility of whole exome sequencing in providing genetic diagnoses for disorders that are genetically and clinically heterogeneous. Further biologic investigation of phenotypes caused by KRT16 mutation may reveal respective contributions of additional genetic variation and environmental effects to the variable clinical presentations.

The Diagnosis: Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome

A  biopsy demonstrated scattered intravascular thrombi in the dermis and subcutis, intact vascular walls, and scant lymphocytic inflammation in a background of stasis (Figure 1). A periodic acid-Schiff stain was negative for fungal elements and highlighted the intravascular thrombi. Histologic findings were consistent with thrombotic vasculopathy. On further laboratory workup, lupus anticoagulant studies, including a mixing study, diluted Russell viper venom test, and hexagonal phase phospholipid neutralization test, were abnormal. Titers of anticardiolipin and β₂-glycoprotein I antibodies were elevated (anticardiolipin IgG, 137.7 calculated units [normal, <15 calculated units]; β₂-glycoprotein I IgG, 256.4 calculated units [normal, <20 calculated units]). Tissue cultures showed no growth of microorganisms and studies for cryoglobulinemia were negative.

The patient was diagnosed with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). He remained on anticoagulation therapy with fondaparinux as an inpatient and was treated with pulse-dose intravenous (IV) corticosteroids followed by a slow oral taper, daily plasmapheresis for 1 week, IV immunoglobulin (0.5 g/kg) for 3 doses, and 4 weekly doses of rituximab (375 mg/m²). His cutaneous findings slowly improved over the next several weeks (Figure 2).

Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disorder characterized by thrombotic events and the presence of autoantibodies. The syndrome is defined by 2 major criteria: (1) the occurrence of at least 1 clinical feature of either an episode of vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity such as unexplained fetal death beyond 10 weeks of gestation or recurrent unexplained pregnancy losses; and (2) the presence of at least 1 type of autoantibody, including lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, or β₂-glycoprotein antibodies, on 2 separate occasions at least 12 weeks apart.¹ Antiphospholipid syndrome can either be primary with no identifiable associated rheumatologic disease or secondary to another autoimmune disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus. Cutaneous manifestations are common and frequently are the first sign of disease in 30% to 40% of patients.² The most common skin finding is persistent livedo reticularis, which can be seen in 20% to 25% of patients. Patients also may develop skin necrosis, ulcerations, digital gangrene, splinter hemorrhages, and livedoid vasculopathy.² Systemic manifestations of APS include thrombocytopenia, nephropathy, cognitive dysfunction, and cardiac valve abnormalities. 

The exact pathogenesis of APS remains unknown. It is thought to be due to the combination of an inflammatory stimulus that has yet to be characterized in conjunction with autoantibodies that affect multiple target cells including monocytes, platelets, and endothelial cells, which results in activation of the complement system and clotting cascade.³ In rare cases, the disorder can progress to catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS), which requires fulfillment of 4 criteria: (1) evidence of involvement of 3 organs, tissues, or systems; (2) development of manifestations simultaneously or in less than 1 week; (3) laboratory confirmation of the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies; and (4) confirmation by histopathology of small vessel occlusion.⁴ Probable CAPS is diagnosed when 3 of 4 criteria are present. Our patient met criteria for probable CAPS, as his antibody titers remained elevated 15 weeks after initial presentation. Precipitating factors that can lead to CAPS are thought to include infection, surgical procedures, medications, or discontinuation of anticoagulation drugs.² Although the mainstay of management of APS is anticoagulation therapy with warfarin and antiplatelet agents such as aspirin, first-line treatment of CAPS involves high-dose systemic glucocorticoids and plasma exchange. Intravenous immunoglobulin also may be employed in treatment. Data from the CAPS registry demonstrate a role for rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, at 375 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks (the regimen described in our case) or 1 g every 14 days for 2 sessions.⁵ A majority of the registry patients treated with rituximab recovered (75% [15/20]) and had no recurrent thrombosis (87% [13/15]) at follow-up.⁵ Data also are emerging on the role of eculizumab, an anti-C5 antibody that inhibits the terminal complement cascade, as a therapy in difficult-to-treat or refractory CAPS.^6-8 The prognosis for CAPS patients without treatment is poor, and mortality has been reported in up to 44% of patients. However, with intervention mortality is reduced by more than 2-fold.^9,10

It is important to recognize that acral cyanosis with persistent livedo reticularis and digital gangrene can be a presenting manifestation of APS. These cutaneous manifestations should prompt histologic evaluation for thrombotic vasculopathy in addition to serologic tests for APS autoantibodies. Although APS may be treated with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, CAPS may require more aggressive therapy with systemic steroids, plasma exchange, IV immunoglobulin, rituximab, and/or eculizumab.

The Diagnosis: Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome

A  biopsy demonstrated scattered intravascular thrombi in the dermis and subcutis, intact vascular walls, and scant lymphocytic inflammation in a background of stasis (Figure 1). A periodic acid-Schiff stain was negative for fungal elements and highlighted the intravascular thrombi. Histologic findings were consistent with thrombotic vasculopathy. On further laboratory workup, lupus anticoagulant studies, including a mixing study, diluted Russell viper venom test, and hexagonal phase phospholipid neutralization test, were abnormal. Titers of anticardiolipin and β₂-glycoprotein I antibodies were elevated (anticardiolipin IgG, 137.7 calculated units [normal, <15 calculated units]; β₂-glycoprotein I IgG, 256.4 calculated units [normal, <20 calculated units]). Tissue cultures showed no growth of microorganisms and studies for cryoglobulinemia were negative.

The patient was diagnosed with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). He remained on anticoagulation therapy with fondaparinux as an inpatient and was treated with pulse-dose intravenous (IV) corticosteroids followed by a slow oral taper, daily plasmapheresis for 1 week, IV immunoglobulin (0.5 g/kg) for 3 doses, and 4 weekly doses of rituximab (375 mg/m²). His cutaneous findings slowly improved over the next several weeks (Figure 2).

Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disorder characterized by thrombotic events and the presence of autoantibodies. The syndrome is defined by 2 major criteria: (1) the occurrence of at least 1 clinical feature of either an episode of vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity such as unexplained fetal death beyond 10 weeks of gestation or recurrent unexplained pregnancy losses; and (2) the presence of at least 1 type of autoantibody, including lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, or β₂-glycoprotein antibodies, on 2 separate occasions at least 12 weeks apart.¹ Antiphospholipid syndrome can either be primary with no identifiable associated rheumatologic disease or secondary to another autoimmune disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus. Cutaneous manifestations are common and frequently are the first sign of disease in 30% to 40% of patients.² The most common skin finding is persistent livedo reticularis, which can be seen in 20% to 25% of patients. Patients also may develop skin necrosis, ulcerations, digital gangrene, splinter hemorrhages, and livedoid vasculopathy.² Systemic manifestations of APS include thrombocytopenia, nephropathy, cognitive dysfunction, and cardiac valve abnormalities. 

The exact pathogenesis of APS remains unknown. It is thought to be due to the combination of an inflammatory stimulus that has yet to be characterized in conjunction with autoantibodies that affect multiple target cells including monocytes, platelets, and endothelial cells, which results in activation of the complement system and clotting cascade.³ In rare cases, the disorder can progress to catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS), which requires fulfillment of 4 criteria: (1) evidence of involvement of 3 organs, tissues, or systems; (2) development of manifestations simultaneously or in less than 1 week; (3) laboratory confirmation of the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies; and (4) confirmation by histopathology of small vessel occlusion.⁴ Probable CAPS is diagnosed when 3 of 4 criteria are present. Our patient met criteria for probable CAPS, as his antibody titers remained elevated 15 weeks after initial presentation. Precipitating factors that can lead to CAPS are thought to include infection, surgical procedures, medications, or discontinuation of anticoagulation drugs.² Although the mainstay of management of APS is anticoagulation therapy with warfarin and antiplatelet agents such as aspirin, first-line treatment of CAPS involves high-dose systemic glucocorticoids and plasma exchange. Intravenous immunoglobulin also may be employed in treatment. Data from the CAPS registry demonstrate a role for rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, at 375 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks (the regimen described in our case) or 1 g every 14 days for 2 sessions.⁵ A majority of the registry patients treated with rituximab recovered (75% [15/20]) and had no recurrent thrombosis (87% [13/15]) at follow-up.⁵ Data also are emerging on the role of eculizumab, an anti-C5 antibody that inhibits the terminal complement cascade, as a therapy in difficult-to-treat or refractory CAPS.^6-8 The prognosis for CAPS patients without treatment is poor, and mortality has been reported in up to 44% of patients. However, with intervention mortality is reduced by more than 2-fold.^9,10

It is important to recognize that acral cyanosis with persistent livedo reticularis and digital gangrene can be a presenting manifestation of APS. These cutaneous manifestations should prompt histologic evaluation for thrombotic vasculopathy in addition to serologic tests for APS autoantibodies. Although APS may be treated with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, CAPS may require more aggressive therapy with systemic steroids, plasma exchange, IV immunoglobulin, rituximab, and/or eculizumab.

The Diagnosis: Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome

A  biopsy demonstrated scattered intravascular thrombi in the dermis and subcutis, intact vascular walls, and scant lymphocytic inflammation in a background of stasis (Figure 1). A periodic acid-Schiff stain was negative for fungal elements and highlighted the intravascular thrombi. Histologic findings were consistent with thrombotic vasculopathy. On further laboratory workup, lupus anticoagulant studies, including a mixing study, diluted Russell viper venom test, and hexagonal phase phospholipid neutralization test, were abnormal. Titers of anticardiolipin and β₂-glycoprotein I antibodies were elevated (anticardiolipin IgG, 137.7 calculated units [normal, <15 calculated units]; β₂-glycoprotein I IgG, 256.4 calculated units [normal, <20 calculated units]). Tissue cultures showed no growth of microorganisms and studies for cryoglobulinemia were negative.

The patient was diagnosed with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). He remained on anticoagulation therapy with fondaparinux as an inpatient and was treated with pulse-dose intravenous (IV) corticosteroids followed by a slow oral taper, daily plasmapheresis for 1 week, IV immunoglobulin (0.5 g/kg) for 3 doses, and 4 weekly doses of rituximab (375 mg/m²). His cutaneous findings slowly improved over the next several weeks (Figure 2).

Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disorder characterized by thrombotic events and the presence of autoantibodies. The syndrome is defined by 2 major criteria: (1) the occurrence of at least 1 clinical feature of either an episode of vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity such as unexplained fetal death beyond 10 weeks of gestation or recurrent unexplained pregnancy losses; and (2) the presence of at least 1 type of autoantibody, including lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, or β₂-glycoprotein antibodies, on 2 separate occasions at least 12 weeks apart.¹ Antiphospholipid syndrome can either be primary with no identifiable associated rheumatologic disease or secondary to another autoimmune disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus. Cutaneous manifestations are common and frequently are the first sign of disease in 30% to 40% of patients.² The most common skin finding is persistent livedo reticularis, which can be seen in 20% to 25% of patients. Patients also may develop skin necrosis, ulcerations, digital gangrene, splinter hemorrhages, and livedoid vasculopathy.² Systemic manifestations of APS include thrombocytopenia, nephropathy, cognitive dysfunction, and cardiac valve abnormalities. 

The exact pathogenesis of APS remains unknown. It is thought to be due to the combination of an inflammatory stimulus that has yet to be characterized in conjunction with autoantibodies that affect multiple target cells including monocytes, platelets, and endothelial cells, which results in activation of the complement system and clotting cascade.³ In rare cases, the disorder can progress to catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS), which requires fulfillment of 4 criteria: (1) evidence of involvement of 3 organs, tissues, or systems; (2) development of manifestations simultaneously or in less than 1 week; (3) laboratory confirmation of the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies; and (4) confirmation by histopathology of small vessel occlusion.⁴ Probable CAPS is diagnosed when 3 of 4 criteria are present. Our patient met criteria for probable CAPS, as his antibody titers remained elevated 15 weeks after initial presentation. Precipitating factors that can lead to CAPS are thought to include infection, surgical procedures, medications, or discontinuation of anticoagulation drugs.² Although the mainstay of management of APS is anticoagulation therapy with warfarin and antiplatelet agents such as aspirin, first-line treatment of CAPS involves high-dose systemic glucocorticoids and plasma exchange. Intravenous immunoglobulin also may be employed in treatment. Data from the CAPS registry demonstrate a role for rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, at 375 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks (the regimen described in our case) or 1 g every 14 days for 2 sessions.⁵ A majority of the registry patients treated with rituximab recovered (75% [15/20]) and had no recurrent thrombosis (87% [13/15]) at follow-up.⁵ Data also are emerging on the role of eculizumab, an anti-C5 antibody that inhibits the terminal complement cascade, as a therapy in difficult-to-treat or refractory CAPS.^6-8 The prognosis for CAPS patients without treatment is poor, and mortality has been reported in up to 44% of patients. However, with intervention mortality is reduced by more than 2-fold.^9,10

It is important to recognize that acral cyanosis with persistent livedo reticularis and digital gangrene can be a presenting manifestation of APS. These cutaneous manifestations should prompt histologic evaluation for thrombotic vasculopathy in addition to serologic tests for APS autoantibodies. Although APS may be treated with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, CAPS may require more aggressive therapy with systemic steroids, plasma exchange, IV immunoglobulin, rituximab, and/or eculizumab.