Local Depigmentation of a Tattoo

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 13:48
Display Headline
Local Depigmentation of a Tattoo

The Diagnosis: Dermatofibroma

On dermoscopy, a central stellate, white, scarlike patch was seen (Figure). On both legs the patient had several additional brown 5- to 7-mm papules with similar dermoscopic features.

Dermoscopic image of dermatofibroma in a tattoo (original magnification ×10).

Dermatofibromas are common benign fibrosing tumors that appear as firm papules or plaques with variable color, commonly on the legs. Typically, lateral compression of a dermatofibroma causes downward displacement, called a positive dimple sign. On histology, fibroblasts and myofibroblasts can be seen as short intersecting fascicles with variable inflammatory cells and induction of adjacent structure hyperplasia. The etiology of dermatofibromas is unclear, though some are thought to be secondary to trauma or arthropod bites.1 Because these tumors are benign, the correct diagnosis can avoid unnecessary biopsies or other procedures.

The dermoscopic features of dermatofibromas have been well established.2 As perhaps the most easily identified structure, scarlike patches were seen in as many as 92% (22/24) of dermatofibromas in one study by Ferarri et al,3 while pigment networks also are commonly seen.2 In our case, given the surrounding dense tattoo deposition, it was difficult to ascertain any pigment network. However, the scarlike central patch was clearly apparent by dermoscopy.

Because dermatofibromas are hypothesized to be secondary to trauma, presumably applying tattoos also may cause dermatofibromas. Limited cases have described dermatofibromas arising in tattoos applied several months to years prior.4-6 No prior cases utilized dermoscopy. In our case, clinical examination and dermoscopy clearly demonstrated features consistent with a dermatofibroma, and the patient had more characteristic dermatofibromas scattered elsewhere on both legs. The patient was reassured that the lesions were benign and that the depigmentation was likely secondary to the process of dermatofibroma growth. She declined any treatment.

References
  1. Bolognia J, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV. Dermatology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.
  2. Zaballos P, Puig S, Llambrich A, et al. Dermoscopy of dermatofibromas: a prospective morphological study of 412 cases. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:75-83.
  3. Ferrari A, Soyer HP, Peris K, et al. Central white scarlike patch: a dermatoscopic clue for the diagnosis of dermatofibroma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:1123-1125.
  4. Kluger N, Cotten H, Magana C, et al. Dermatofibroma occurring within a tattoo: report of two cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:696-698.
  5. Lobato-Berezo A, Churruca-Grijelmo M, Martínez-Pérez M, et al. Dermatofibroma arising within a black tattoo [published online September 23, 2014]. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2014;2014:745304.
  6. Bittencourt Mde J, Miranda MF, Parijós AM, et al. Dermatofibroma in a black tattoo: report of a case. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88:614-616.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: David L. Swanson, MD, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 (swanson.david@mayo.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 101(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E8-E9
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: David L. Swanson, MD, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 (swanson.david@mayo.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: David L. Swanson, MD, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 (swanson.david@mayo.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF

The Diagnosis: Dermatofibroma

On dermoscopy, a central stellate, white, scarlike patch was seen (Figure). On both legs the patient had several additional brown 5- to 7-mm papules with similar dermoscopic features.

Dermoscopic image of dermatofibroma in a tattoo (original magnification ×10).

Dermatofibromas are common benign fibrosing tumors that appear as firm papules or plaques with variable color, commonly on the legs. Typically, lateral compression of a dermatofibroma causes downward displacement, called a positive dimple sign. On histology, fibroblasts and myofibroblasts can be seen as short intersecting fascicles with variable inflammatory cells and induction of adjacent structure hyperplasia. The etiology of dermatofibromas is unclear, though some are thought to be secondary to trauma or arthropod bites.1 Because these tumors are benign, the correct diagnosis can avoid unnecessary biopsies or other procedures.

The dermoscopic features of dermatofibromas have been well established.2 As perhaps the most easily identified structure, scarlike patches were seen in as many as 92% (22/24) of dermatofibromas in one study by Ferarri et al,3 while pigment networks also are commonly seen.2 In our case, given the surrounding dense tattoo deposition, it was difficult to ascertain any pigment network. However, the scarlike central patch was clearly apparent by dermoscopy.

Because dermatofibromas are hypothesized to be secondary to trauma, presumably applying tattoos also may cause dermatofibromas. Limited cases have described dermatofibromas arising in tattoos applied several months to years prior.4-6 No prior cases utilized dermoscopy. In our case, clinical examination and dermoscopy clearly demonstrated features consistent with a dermatofibroma, and the patient had more characteristic dermatofibromas scattered elsewhere on both legs. The patient was reassured that the lesions were benign and that the depigmentation was likely secondary to the process of dermatofibroma growth. She declined any treatment.

The Diagnosis: Dermatofibroma

On dermoscopy, a central stellate, white, scarlike patch was seen (Figure). On both legs the patient had several additional brown 5- to 7-mm papules with similar dermoscopic features.

Dermoscopic image of dermatofibroma in a tattoo (original magnification ×10).

Dermatofibromas are common benign fibrosing tumors that appear as firm papules or plaques with variable color, commonly on the legs. Typically, lateral compression of a dermatofibroma causes downward displacement, called a positive dimple sign. On histology, fibroblasts and myofibroblasts can be seen as short intersecting fascicles with variable inflammatory cells and induction of adjacent structure hyperplasia. The etiology of dermatofibromas is unclear, though some are thought to be secondary to trauma or arthropod bites.1 Because these tumors are benign, the correct diagnosis can avoid unnecessary biopsies or other procedures.

The dermoscopic features of dermatofibromas have been well established.2 As perhaps the most easily identified structure, scarlike patches were seen in as many as 92% (22/24) of dermatofibromas in one study by Ferarri et al,3 while pigment networks also are commonly seen.2 In our case, given the surrounding dense tattoo deposition, it was difficult to ascertain any pigment network. However, the scarlike central patch was clearly apparent by dermoscopy.

Because dermatofibromas are hypothesized to be secondary to trauma, presumably applying tattoos also may cause dermatofibromas. Limited cases have described dermatofibromas arising in tattoos applied several months to years prior.4-6 No prior cases utilized dermoscopy. In our case, clinical examination and dermoscopy clearly demonstrated features consistent with a dermatofibroma, and the patient had more characteristic dermatofibromas scattered elsewhere on both legs. The patient was reassured that the lesions were benign and that the depigmentation was likely secondary to the process of dermatofibroma growth. She declined any treatment.

References
  1. Bolognia J, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV. Dermatology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.
  2. Zaballos P, Puig S, Llambrich A, et al. Dermoscopy of dermatofibromas: a prospective morphological study of 412 cases. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:75-83.
  3. Ferrari A, Soyer HP, Peris K, et al. Central white scarlike patch: a dermatoscopic clue for the diagnosis of dermatofibroma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:1123-1125.
  4. Kluger N, Cotten H, Magana C, et al. Dermatofibroma occurring within a tattoo: report of two cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:696-698.
  5. Lobato-Berezo A, Churruca-Grijelmo M, Martínez-Pérez M, et al. Dermatofibroma arising within a black tattoo [published online September 23, 2014]. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2014;2014:745304.
  6. Bittencourt Mde J, Miranda MF, Parijós AM, et al. Dermatofibroma in a black tattoo: report of a case. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88:614-616.
References
  1. Bolognia J, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV. Dermatology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.
  2. Zaballos P, Puig S, Llambrich A, et al. Dermoscopy of dermatofibromas: a prospective morphological study of 412 cases. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:75-83.
  3. Ferrari A, Soyer HP, Peris K, et al. Central white scarlike patch: a dermatoscopic clue for the diagnosis of dermatofibroma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:1123-1125.
  4. Kluger N, Cotten H, Magana C, et al. Dermatofibroma occurring within a tattoo: report of two cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:696-698.
  5. Lobato-Berezo A, Churruca-Grijelmo M, Martínez-Pérez M, et al. Dermatofibroma arising within a black tattoo [published online September 23, 2014]. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2014;2014:745304.
  6. Bittencourt Mde J, Miranda MF, Parijós AM, et al. Dermatofibroma in a black tattoo: report of a case. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88:614-616.
Issue
Cutis - 101(1)
Issue
Cutis - 101(1)
Page Number
E8-E9
Page Number
E8-E9
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Local Depigmentation of a Tattoo
Display Headline
Local Depigmentation of a Tattoo
Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 41-year-old woman presented with loss of pigment in a tattoo on the left ankle. The tattoo was initially placed several years prior to presentation. For an uncertain amount of time, she had noticed a small palpable whitish area with loss of tattoo pigment. There was no corresponding pain, pruritis, or other symptoms. Her dermatologic history was notable only for keratosis pilaris. Physical examination showed an approximately 7-mm whitish firm papule on the lateral aspect of the left ankle, clearly visible in an otherwise green-black area of the tattoo (arrow). The lesion displaced downward with lateral compression.

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
PubMed ID
29529113
Disqus Comments
Default
Article PDF Media