Much of my practice has focused on the treatment of menopausal women, but which of my patients can benefit from this particular combination of conjugated estrogen (CE) 0.45 mg plus bazedoxifene (BZA) 20 mg? I asked Dr Pinkerton this question, and more.
WHICH PATIENTS CAN BENEFIT MOST?
Dr Pinkerton: CE/BZA was tested in healthy postmenopausal women with a uterus who are at risk for bone loss and were reporting 50 or more moderate to severe hot flashes per week. The combination of CE and BZA is a good choice for women who have bothersome menopausal symptoms: hot flashes, night sweats, and sleep disruption or symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA)—although it’s not approved for VVA.
Efficacy and safety data show that compared with placebo
• CE/BZA decreases the frequency and severity of hot flashes at 12 weeks, and those decreases are maintained at 12 months.1,2
• Women taking CE/BZA have greater improvements in sleep, with both decreased sleep disturbance and time to fall asleep.3
• CE/BZA maintained or prevented lumbar spine and hip bone loss in postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporosis.1,4,5
Although fracture data were not captured and the drug was not tested in osteoporotic women, study results showed bone loss prevention at 12 months, which was sustained at 24 months. The improvement in bone mineral density from baseline was about 1% to 1.5%. This was compared with a bone loss of 1.8% in women taking placebo.
In clinical studies, women taking CE/BZA versus placebo also reported a lower incidence of painful intercourse6 and some improvement in health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction.7,8
In short, CE/BZA is a good option for symptomatic menopausal women with a uterus who have bothersome hot flashes, night sweats, and sleep disruptions and want to prevent bone loss.
WHAT ABOUT ADVERSE EFFECTS?
Dr Pinkerton: In general, CE/BZA has a favorable safety and tolerability profile, with an overall incidence of adverse events similar to placebo. The rates of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, cancers (breast, endometrial, and ovarian), and mortality are comparable to placebo in two-year trials. These data are limited; studies have been conducted in healthy postmenopausal women. Future studies need to define the full risk profile, particularly among overweight or obese women and different ethnic groups, as well as for longer-term use.
IS THERE A ROLE AMONG WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER?
Dr Pinkerton: CE/BZA has not been tested in women at risk for or who have a history of breast cancer. In preclinical trials of up to two years’ duration, involving healthy postmenopausal women, the rates for breast cancer with CE/BZA were similar to placebo. There are no long-term data, however, and there are no data in women at risk for breast cancer. I recommend that women who have or are at high risk for breast cancer consider nonhormonal treatment options.9–11
HAS THERE BEEN AN ASSOCIATED INCREASE IN BREAST DENSITY WITH CE/BZA?
Dr Pinkerton: No. Data from two randomized clinical trials showed that the breast density changes with 12-month CE/BZA treatment were similar to placebo—which is markedly different from comparisons of placebo and combination estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT), where EPT increased breast density. If indeed this lack of an association translates into fewer breast cancers, it would be wonderful, but we do not have long-term data. We can tell our patients that using CE/BZA has not been shown to increase the risk for breast cancer, at least up to two years.
Continue for differences from traditional EPT >>