User login
The Meaningful Use (MU) program as doctors know it may soon be ending, but audits of past attestations are slated to continue for at least the next 6 years.
Experts offer the following guidance on how to successfully manage audits and subsequent appeals.
1. Expect an audit.
Assume that at some point, you will be audited, said Joshua J. Freemire, a health law attorney based in Baltimore who specializes in regulatory compliance matters.
“Have good procedures in place to ensure the audit is brought to the attention of management and responded to promptly,” Mr. Freemire said in an interview. “Similarly, it is important that practices understand, in advance, how information created by their EHR is stored and managed.”
Audits are not limited to the current or most recent year, he noted. Being able to promptly access the appropriate information is an important part of drafting appropriate responses.
2. Save records
Keep all relevant records electronically for at least 6 years after attestation, advised Carmiña Nitzki, a senior consultant with GE Healthcare Camden Group.
Some documentation, such as your security risk analysis, should be maintained in paper form, she added. It is also helpful to take screen shots of certain measures that address the functionality of your system.
Records should follow when a physician moves a practice or changes employment. Ms. Nitzki recently assisted a case in which an early adopter physician dissolved his practice, became employed, and moved offices. His 2011 attestation was later audited, and he did not have all of the requested information. The doctor came to Ms. Nitzki after failing an audit and being assessed an $18,000 recoupment payment. Together, they were able to recreate and locate much of the necessary records through old emails and past documentation.
“We won the appeal,” said Ms. Nitzki, who spoke about meaningful use audits at a recent American Bar Association meeting. “The takeaway is if you’re going to respond to an audit, make sure you understand everything that they’re asking for and that you’re confident that you’re responding with all of the appropriate documentation,” she said.
3. Meet deadlines
Promptly responding to audits and quickly addressing failed audits are critical, Mr. Freemire said.
“The [MU] program is very strict with regard to deadlines, and an appeal cannot be filed once the applicable deadline has passed,” he said.
Mr. Freemire said that he routinely encounters health providers who have missed deadlines or let too much time lapse after being contacted by the government. Failure to meet deadlines can result from various reasons, including that notices are not promptly brought to the physician’s attention, delays investigating the availability of requested materials, or a false assumption that the requested information is readily at hand, he said.
Ensure that all audit deadlines are recorded and work with staff and leadership to file responses on time. Factor in additional time if there could be difficulty in locating records, experts stressed.
“I see difficulty in effectively responding to audits where records are simply not maintained,” he said. “Again, this can happen for many reasons, including personnel turnover, but it can be difficult or impossible to effectively respond to audit requests” in this situation.
4. Appeal effectively
Swiftly and thoroughly appeal a failed audit.
When a doctor fails an audit, it’s usually because of incomplete responses or missing information, Ms. Nitzki said. Only those measures that were rejected or that failed to meet standards need to be addressed during an appeal. Sending a cover letter to CMS with the appeal, explaining why the doctor may have failed initially can strengthen the case, she said.
“The appeals process is done directly with CMS, so they’re a little more reasonable,” she said. “They tend to look at things on broader scale.”
Don’t wait to appeal, Mr. Freemire said. Practices have 30 days from the date of an adverse audit determination letter to submit an appeal. If time runs out, physicians must pay back any money requested by auditors, and CMS expects the recoupment in full.
“Following a negative decision, the most important step is prompt attention,” he said. “The sooner that process begins, the sooner it can be completed. The time line for audit appeals is not generous and providers need to ensure they react promptly to a negative finding.”
5. Get help
Ms. Nitzki recommends that physicians obtain professional assistance when responding to an audit.
Practices can hire a consulting company or find audit resources from their specialty society or state medical association. The American Academy of Family Physicians provides a tip sheet on responding to audits. Some state organizations, such as the Texas Medical Association, offer a helpline for doctors to call and ask questions related to meaningful use.
“Unless they have a very savvy person in their office who has taken care all of their meaningful use attestations and documentation, we recommend they get help because it’s in the details where they could fail,” she said.
Seeking help after a failed audit is also essential, notes Mr. Freemire. Experts who are familiar with the program and its requirements and procedures can be of great assistance when it comes organizing the facts into a persuasive argument, he said.
“A cost/benefit is necessary – as it is with all service providers,” he said. “But a provider’s chances for a successful appeal are increased when that appeal is prepared by someone who understands the history and intention behind program requirements, who can best identify and present the necessary evidence of compliance, and who can make a compelling argument as to the provider’s satisfaction of program requirements.”
On Twitter @legal_med
The Meaningful Use (MU) program as doctors know it may soon be ending, but audits of past attestations are slated to continue for at least the next 6 years.
Experts offer the following guidance on how to successfully manage audits and subsequent appeals.
1. Expect an audit.
Assume that at some point, you will be audited, said Joshua J. Freemire, a health law attorney based in Baltimore who specializes in regulatory compliance matters.
“Have good procedures in place to ensure the audit is brought to the attention of management and responded to promptly,” Mr. Freemire said in an interview. “Similarly, it is important that practices understand, in advance, how information created by their EHR is stored and managed.”
Audits are not limited to the current or most recent year, he noted. Being able to promptly access the appropriate information is an important part of drafting appropriate responses.
2. Save records
Keep all relevant records electronically for at least 6 years after attestation, advised Carmiña Nitzki, a senior consultant with GE Healthcare Camden Group.
Some documentation, such as your security risk analysis, should be maintained in paper form, she added. It is also helpful to take screen shots of certain measures that address the functionality of your system.
Records should follow when a physician moves a practice or changes employment. Ms. Nitzki recently assisted a case in which an early adopter physician dissolved his practice, became employed, and moved offices. His 2011 attestation was later audited, and he did not have all of the requested information. The doctor came to Ms. Nitzki after failing an audit and being assessed an $18,000 recoupment payment. Together, they were able to recreate and locate much of the necessary records through old emails and past documentation.
“We won the appeal,” said Ms. Nitzki, who spoke about meaningful use audits at a recent American Bar Association meeting. “The takeaway is if you’re going to respond to an audit, make sure you understand everything that they’re asking for and that you’re confident that you’re responding with all of the appropriate documentation,” she said.
3. Meet deadlines
Promptly responding to audits and quickly addressing failed audits are critical, Mr. Freemire said.
“The [MU] program is very strict with regard to deadlines, and an appeal cannot be filed once the applicable deadline has passed,” he said.
Mr. Freemire said that he routinely encounters health providers who have missed deadlines or let too much time lapse after being contacted by the government. Failure to meet deadlines can result from various reasons, including that notices are not promptly brought to the physician’s attention, delays investigating the availability of requested materials, or a false assumption that the requested information is readily at hand, he said.
Ensure that all audit deadlines are recorded and work with staff and leadership to file responses on time. Factor in additional time if there could be difficulty in locating records, experts stressed.
“I see difficulty in effectively responding to audits where records are simply not maintained,” he said. “Again, this can happen for many reasons, including personnel turnover, but it can be difficult or impossible to effectively respond to audit requests” in this situation.
4. Appeal effectively
Swiftly and thoroughly appeal a failed audit.
When a doctor fails an audit, it’s usually because of incomplete responses or missing information, Ms. Nitzki said. Only those measures that were rejected or that failed to meet standards need to be addressed during an appeal. Sending a cover letter to CMS with the appeal, explaining why the doctor may have failed initially can strengthen the case, she said.
“The appeals process is done directly with CMS, so they’re a little more reasonable,” she said. “They tend to look at things on broader scale.”
Don’t wait to appeal, Mr. Freemire said. Practices have 30 days from the date of an adverse audit determination letter to submit an appeal. If time runs out, physicians must pay back any money requested by auditors, and CMS expects the recoupment in full.
“Following a negative decision, the most important step is prompt attention,” he said. “The sooner that process begins, the sooner it can be completed. The time line for audit appeals is not generous and providers need to ensure they react promptly to a negative finding.”
5. Get help
Ms. Nitzki recommends that physicians obtain professional assistance when responding to an audit.
Practices can hire a consulting company or find audit resources from their specialty society or state medical association. The American Academy of Family Physicians provides a tip sheet on responding to audits. Some state organizations, such as the Texas Medical Association, offer a helpline for doctors to call and ask questions related to meaningful use.
“Unless they have a very savvy person in their office who has taken care all of their meaningful use attestations and documentation, we recommend they get help because it’s in the details where they could fail,” she said.
Seeking help after a failed audit is also essential, notes Mr. Freemire. Experts who are familiar with the program and its requirements and procedures can be of great assistance when it comes organizing the facts into a persuasive argument, he said.
“A cost/benefit is necessary – as it is with all service providers,” he said. “But a provider’s chances for a successful appeal are increased when that appeal is prepared by someone who understands the history and intention behind program requirements, who can best identify and present the necessary evidence of compliance, and who can make a compelling argument as to the provider’s satisfaction of program requirements.”
On Twitter @legal_med
The Meaningful Use (MU) program as doctors know it may soon be ending, but audits of past attestations are slated to continue for at least the next 6 years.
Experts offer the following guidance on how to successfully manage audits and subsequent appeals.
1. Expect an audit.
Assume that at some point, you will be audited, said Joshua J. Freemire, a health law attorney based in Baltimore who specializes in regulatory compliance matters.
“Have good procedures in place to ensure the audit is brought to the attention of management and responded to promptly,” Mr. Freemire said in an interview. “Similarly, it is important that practices understand, in advance, how information created by their EHR is stored and managed.”
Audits are not limited to the current or most recent year, he noted. Being able to promptly access the appropriate information is an important part of drafting appropriate responses.
2. Save records
Keep all relevant records electronically for at least 6 years after attestation, advised Carmiña Nitzki, a senior consultant with GE Healthcare Camden Group.
Some documentation, such as your security risk analysis, should be maintained in paper form, she added. It is also helpful to take screen shots of certain measures that address the functionality of your system.
Records should follow when a physician moves a practice or changes employment. Ms. Nitzki recently assisted a case in which an early adopter physician dissolved his practice, became employed, and moved offices. His 2011 attestation was later audited, and he did not have all of the requested information. The doctor came to Ms. Nitzki after failing an audit and being assessed an $18,000 recoupment payment. Together, they were able to recreate and locate much of the necessary records through old emails and past documentation.
“We won the appeal,” said Ms. Nitzki, who spoke about meaningful use audits at a recent American Bar Association meeting. “The takeaway is if you’re going to respond to an audit, make sure you understand everything that they’re asking for and that you’re confident that you’re responding with all of the appropriate documentation,” she said.
3. Meet deadlines
Promptly responding to audits and quickly addressing failed audits are critical, Mr. Freemire said.
“The [MU] program is very strict with regard to deadlines, and an appeal cannot be filed once the applicable deadline has passed,” he said.
Mr. Freemire said that he routinely encounters health providers who have missed deadlines or let too much time lapse after being contacted by the government. Failure to meet deadlines can result from various reasons, including that notices are not promptly brought to the physician’s attention, delays investigating the availability of requested materials, or a false assumption that the requested information is readily at hand, he said.
Ensure that all audit deadlines are recorded and work with staff and leadership to file responses on time. Factor in additional time if there could be difficulty in locating records, experts stressed.
“I see difficulty in effectively responding to audits where records are simply not maintained,” he said. “Again, this can happen for many reasons, including personnel turnover, but it can be difficult or impossible to effectively respond to audit requests” in this situation.
4. Appeal effectively
Swiftly and thoroughly appeal a failed audit.
When a doctor fails an audit, it’s usually because of incomplete responses or missing information, Ms. Nitzki said. Only those measures that were rejected or that failed to meet standards need to be addressed during an appeal. Sending a cover letter to CMS with the appeal, explaining why the doctor may have failed initially can strengthen the case, she said.
“The appeals process is done directly with CMS, so they’re a little more reasonable,” she said. “They tend to look at things on broader scale.”
Don’t wait to appeal, Mr. Freemire said. Practices have 30 days from the date of an adverse audit determination letter to submit an appeal. If time runs out, physicians must pay back any money requested by auditors, and CMS expects the recoupment in full.
“Following a negative decision, the most important step is prompt attention,” he said. “The sooner that process begins, the sooner it can be completed. The time line for audit appeals is not generous and providers need to ensure they react promptly to a negative finding.”
5. Get help
Ms. Nitzki recommends that physicians obtain professional assistance when responding to an audit.
Practices can hire a consulting company or find audit resources from their specialty society or state medical association. The American Academy of Family Physicians provides a tip sheet on responding to audits. Some state organizations, such as the Texas Medical Association, offer a helpline for doctors to call and ask questions related to meaningful use.
“Unless they have a very savvy person in their office who has taken care all of their meaningful use attestations and documentation, we recommend they get help because it’s in the details where they could fail,” she said.
Seeking help after a failed audit is also essential, notes Mr. Freemire. Experts who are familiar with the program and its requirements and procedures can be of great assistance when it comes organizing the facts into a persuasive argument, he said.
“A cost/benefit is necessary – as it is with all service providers,” he said. “But a provider’s chances for a successful appeal are increased when that appeal is prepared by someone who understands the history and intention behind program requirements, who can best identify and present the necessary evidence of compliance, and who can make a compelling argument as to the provider’s satisfaction of program requirements.”
On Twitter @legal_med
