HelpDesk

Does oseltamivir shorten flu symptom duration?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER:

Yes. Treatment of influenza virus infection with oral oseltamivir reduces time to alleviation of symptoms in adults and children by approximately one day compared with placebo. It reduces symptom duration even when initiated more than 2 days after symptom onset (strength of recommendation: A, systematic review of randomized controlled trials [RCTs], meta-analysis of observation trials, RCT).

Evidence summary

A 2014 systematic review included 8 RCTs in adults (3954 patients) and one RCT in children (669 patients) with influenza and compared time to alleviation of symptoms with oseltamivir and placebo.1 Symptoms were defined as local (nasal discharge, dry cough, sore throat) and systemic (fever, myalgia, headache, fatigue). Methodology for diagnosis varied by trial.

Oral oseltamivir (75, 150, or 300 mg for 5 to 10 days) reduced time to first alleviation of symptoms by 17 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-25 hours) compared with placebo for adults and 29 hours (95% CI, 12-47 hours) for the otherwise healthy children.

The systematic review also included 2 RCTs involving 660 children with chronic asthma who received treatment with oseltamivir. Researchers found no reduction in time to symptom alleviation with the oseltamivir.

Treatment with oseltamivir increased the risk of nausea (number needed to harm [NNH]=28) and vomiting (NNH=22) in adults and the risk of vomiting (NNH=19) in children. Sources of bias included industry sponsorship of all trials, differing placebo components, inadequate recruitment, and use of other medication.

Shorter fever duration?

A 2012 meta-analysis of 6 observational studies (5842 patients) compared the effect of oral oseltamivir with no treatment on duration of signs and symptoms (definition not given) in patients with influenza (method of diagnosis not stated).2 Oseltamivir reduced fever duration by 33 hours (95% CI, 21-45 hours) compared with no treatment.

The authors describe the evidence as being of very low quality because of study heterogeneity, lack of control for confounding variables, selection bias, and study sources (many unpublished industry studies).

Pages

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Recommended Reading

Paperwork snarls stand between kids and at-school asthma medications
MDedge Family Medicine
ED visits due to anaphylaxis doubled at Canadian children’s hospital
MDedge Family Medicine
Novel device therapy shows continued benefits in pediatric peanut allergy
MDedge Family Medicine
Predictors of abnormal longitudinal patterns of lung-function growth and decline
MDedge Family Medicine
Atopic dermatitis increases risk of ADHD, comorbidities add to it
MDedge Family Medicine
Crisaborole’s safety holds up in long-term atopic dermatitis trial
MDedge Family Medicine
The promise of peanut allergy prevention lies in draft guidelines
MDedge Family Medicine
Nonwhite race, lower socioeconomic status predicts persistently active AD
MDedge Family Medicine
Nonwhite race, lower socioeconomic status predicts persistently active AD
MDedge Family Medicine
Study links severe childhood eczema to sedentary behaviors
MDedge Family Medicine