Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/07/2024 - 14:07
Display Headline
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Care for Patients With Skin Cancer

To the Editor:

The most common malignancy in the United States is skin cancer, with melanoma accounting for the majority of skin cancer deaths.1 Despite the lack of established guidelines for routine total-body skin examinations, many patients regularly visit their dermatologist for assessment of pigmented skin lesions.2 During the COVID-19 pandemic, many patients were unable to attend in-person dermatology visits, which resulted in many high-risk individuals not receiving care or alternatively seeking virtual care for cutaneous lesions.3 There has been a lack of research in the United States exploring the utilization of teledermatology during the pandemic and its overall impact on the care of patients with a history of skin cancer. We explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care for patients with skin cancer in a large US population.

Characteristics of Adults (≥18 Years) With and Without a History of Skin Cancera  in 2020-2021 NHIS (N=46,679)

Characteristics of Adults (≥18 Years) With and Without a History of Skin Cancera  in 2020-2021 NHIS (N=46,679)

Using anonymous survey data from the 2020-2021 National Health Interview Survey,4 we conducted a ­population-based, cross-sectional study to evaluate access to care during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients with a self-reported history of skin cancer—melanoma, nonmelanoma skin cancer, or unknown skin cancer. The 3 outcome variables included having a virtual medical appointment in the past 12 months (yes/no), delaying medical care due to the COVID-19 pandemic (yes/no), and not receiving care due to the COVID-19 pandemic (yes/no). Multivariable logistic regression models evaluating the relationship between a history of skin cancer and access to care were constructed using Stata/MP 17.0 (StataCorp LLC). We controlled for patient age; education; race/ethnicity; received public assistance or welfare payments; sex; region; US citizenship status; health insurance status; comorbidities including history of hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia; and birthplace in the United States in the logistic regression models.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis for Individuals With a History of Skin Cancer

Our analysis included 46,679 patients aged 18 years or older, of whom 3.4% (weighted)(n=2204) reported a history of skin cancer (eTable 1). The weighted percentage was calculated using National Health Interview Survey design parameters (accounting for the multistage sampling design) to represent the general US population. Compared with those with no history of skin cancer, patients with a history of skin cancer were significantly more likely to delay medical care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.21-1.54; P<.001) or not receive care (AOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16-1.57; P<.001) due to the pandemic and were more likely to have had a virtual medical visit in the past 12 months (AOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.26; P=.05). Additionally, subgroup analysis revealed that females were more likely than males to forego medical care (eTable 2). β Coefficients for independent and dependent variables were further analyzed using logistic regression (eTable 3).

β Coefficientsa  for Dependent Variables in Regression Models

After adjusting for various potential confounders including comorbidities, our results revealed that patients with a history of skin cancer reported that they were less likely to receive in-person medical care due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as high-risk individuals with a history of skin cancer may have stopped receiving total-body skin examinations and dermatology care during the pandemic. Our findings showed that patients with a history of skin cancer were more likely than those without skin cancer to delay or forego care due to the pandemic, which may contribute to a higher incidence of advanced-stage melanomas postpandemic. Trepanowski et al5 reported an increased incidence of patients presenting with more advanced melanomas during the pandemic. Telemedicine was more commonly utilized by patients with a history of skin cancer during the pandemic.

In the future, virtual care may help limit advanced stages of skin cancer by serving as a viable alternative to in-person care.6 It has been reported that telemedicine can serve as a useful triage service reducing patient wait times.7 Teledermatology should not replace in-person care, as there is no evidence of the diagnostic accuracy of this service and many patients still will need to be seen in-person for confirmation of their diagnosis and potential biopsy. Further studies are needed to assess for missed skin cancer diagnoses due to the utilization of telemedicine.

Limitations of this study included a self-reported history of skin cancer, β coefficients that may suggest a high degree of collinearity, and lack of specific survey questions regarding dermatologic care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further long-term studies exploring the clinical applicability and diagnostic accuracy of virtual medicine visits for cutaneous malignancies are vital, as teledermatology may play an essential role in curbing rising skin cancer rates even beyond the pandemic.

References
  1. Guy GP Jr, Thomas CC, Thompson T, et al. Vital signs: melanoma incidence and mortality trends and projections—United States, 1982-2030. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:591-596.
  2. Whiteman DC, Olsen CM, MacGregor S, et al; QSkin Study. The effect of screening on melanoma incidence and biopsy rates. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187:515-522. doi:10.1111/bjd.21649
  3. Jobbágy A, Kiss N, Meznerics FA, et al. Emergency use and efficacy of an asynchronous teledermatology system as a novel tool for early diagnosis of skin cancer during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:2699. doi:10.3390/ijerph19052699
  4. National Center for Health Statistics. NHIS Data, Questionnaires and Related Documentation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Accessed April 19, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/data-questionnaires-documentation.htm
  5. Trepanowski N, Chang MS, Zhou G, et al. Delays in melanoma presentation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide multi-institutional cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87:1217-1219. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.031
  6. Chiru MR, Hindocha S, Burova E, et al. Management of the two-week wait pathway for skin cancer patients, before and during the pandemic: is virtual consultation an option? J Pers Med. 2022;12:1258. doi:10.3390/jpm12081258
  7. Finnane A, Dallest K, Janda M, et al. Teledermatology for the diagnosis and management of skin cancer: a systematic review. JAMA ­Dermatol. 2017;153:319-327. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4361
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Brandon Smith is from the Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Priya Engel is from the California University of Science and Medicine, Colton. Sogol Stephanie Javadi is from the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. Dr. Egeberg is from the Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, and the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen. Dr. Wu is from the University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Florida.

Brandon Smith, Priya Engel, and Sogol Stephanie Javadi report no conflict of interest. Dr. Egeberg has received research funding from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, the Danish National Psoriasis Foundation, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the Kgl Hofbundtmager Aage Bang Foundation, Novartis, Pfizer, and the Simon Spies Foundation. He also is a consultant and/or speaker for or is/has been an employee of AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Galápagos NV, Galderma, Horizon Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis Co Ltd, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, Union Therapeutics, and Zuellig Pharma Ltd. Dr. Wu is or has been a consultant, investigator, or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Aristea Therapeutics, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Codex Labs, Dermavant, DermTech, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, EPI Health, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mindera, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi Genzyme, Solius, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Zerigo Health.

The eTables are available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Jashin J. Wu, MD, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave, RMSB, Room 2023-A, Miami, FL 33136 (jashinwu@gmail.com). ORCID: 0000-0002-1722-1892. Scopus Author ID: 14629788600

Issue
Cutis - 113(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
208-209,E1-E4
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Brandon Smith is from the Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Priya Engel is from the California University of Science and Medicine, Colton. Sogol Stephanie Javadi is from the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. Dr. Egeberg is from the Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, and the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen. Dr. Wu is from the University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Florida.

Brandon Smith, Priya Engel, and Sogol Stephanie Javadi report no conflict of interest. Dr. Egeberg has received research funding from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, the Danish National Psoriasis Foundation, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the Kgl Hofbundtmager Aage Bang Foundation, Novartis, Pfizer, and the Simon Spies Foundation. He also is a consultant and/or speaker for or is/has been an employee of AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Galápagos NV, Galderma, Horizon Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis Co Ltd, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, Union Therapeutics, and Zuellig Pharma Ltd. Dr. Wu is or has been a consultant, investigator, or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Aristea Therapeutics, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Codex Labs, Dermavant, DermTech, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, EPI Health, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mindera, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi Genzyme, Solius, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Zerigo Health.

The eTables are available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Jashin J. Wu, MD, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave, RMSB, Room 2023-A, Miami, FL 33136 (jashinwu@gmail.com). ORCID: 0000-0002-1722-1892. Scopus Author ID: 14629788600

Author and Disclosure Information

Brandon Smith is from the Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Priya Engel is from the California University of Science and Medicine, Colton. Sogol Stephanie Javadi is from the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. Dr. Egeberg is from the Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, and the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen. Dr. Wu is from the University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Florida.

Brandon Smith, Priya Engel, and Sogol Stephanie Javadi report no conflict of interest. Dr. Egeberg has received research funding from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, the Danish National Psoriasis Foundation, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the Kgl Hofbundtmager Aage Bang Foundation, Novartis, Pfizer, and the Simon Spies Foundation. He also is a consultant and/or speaker for or is/has been an employee of AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Galápagos NV, Galderma, Horizon Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis Co Ltd, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, Union Therapeutics, and Zuellig Pharma Ltd. Dr. Wu is or has been a consultant, investigator, or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Aristea Therapeutics, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Codex Labs, Dermavant, DermTech, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, EPI Health, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mindera, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi Genzyme, Solius, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Zerigo Health.

The eTables are available in the Appendix online at www.mdedge.com/dermatology.

Correspondence: Jashin J. Wu, MD, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave, RMSB, Room 2023-A, Miami, FL 33136 (jashinwu@gmail.com). ORCID: 0000-0002-1722-1892. Scopus Author ID: 14629788600

Article PDF
Article PDF

To the Editor:

The most common malignancy in the United States is skin cancer, with melanoma accounting for the majority of skin cancer deaths.1 Despite the lack of established guidelines for routine total-body skin examinations, many patients regularly visit their dermatologist for assessment of pigmented skin lesions.2 During the COVID-19 pandemic, many patients were unable to attend in-person dermatology visits, which resulted in many high-risk individuals not receiving care or alternatively seeking virtual care for cutaneous lesions.3 There has been a lack of research in the United States exploring the utilization of teledermatology during the pandemic and its overall impact on the care of patients with a history of skin cancer. We explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care for patients with skin cancer in a large US population.

Characteristics of Adults (≥18 Years) With and Without a History of Skin Cancera  in 2020-2021 NHIS (N=46,679)

Characteristics of Adults (≥18 Years) With and Without a History of Skin Cancera  in 2020-2021 NHIS (N=46,679)

Using anonymous survey data from the 2020-2021 National Health Interview Survey,4 we conducted a ­population-based, cross-sectional study to evaluate access to care during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients with a self-reported history of skin cancer—melanoma, nonmelanoma skin cancer, or unknown skin cancer. The 3 outcome variables included having a virtual medical appointment in the past 12 months (yes/no), delaying medical care due to the COVID-19 pandemic (yes/no), and not receiving care due to the COVID-19 pandemic (yes/no). Multivariable logistic regression models evaluating the relationship between a history of skin cancer and access to care were constructed using Stata/MP 17.0 (StataCorp LLC). We controlled for patient age; education; race/ethnicity; received public assistance or welfare payments; sex; region; US citizenship status; health insurance status; comorbidities including history of hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia; and birthplace in the United States in the logistic regression models.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis for Individuals With a History of Skin Cancer

Our analysis included 46,679 patients aged 18 years or older, of whom 3.4% (weighted)(n=2204) reported a history of skin cancer (eTable 1). The weighted percentage was calculated using National Health Interview Survey design parameters (accounting for the multistage sampling design) to represent the general US population. Compared with those with no history of skin cancer, patients with a history of skin cancer were significantly more likely to delay medical care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.21-1.54; P<.001) or not receive care (AOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16-1.57; P<.001) due to the pandemic and were more likely to have had a virtual medical visit in the past 12 months (AOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.26; P=.05). Additionally, subgroup analysis revealed that females were more likely than males to forego medical care (eTable 2). β Coefficients for independent and dependent variables were further analyzed using logistic regression (eTable 3).

β Coefficientsa  for Dependent Variables in Regression Models

After adjusting for various potential confounders including comorbidities, our results revealed that patients with a history of skin cancer reported that they were less likely to receive in-person medical care due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as high-risk individuals with a history of skin cancer may have stopped receiving total-body skin examinations and dermatology care during the pandemic. Our findings showed that patients with a history of skin cancer were more likely than those without skin cancer to delay or forego care due to the pandemic, which may contribute to a higher incidence of advanced-stage melanomas postpandemic. Trepanowski et al5 reported an increased incidence of patients presenting with more advanced melanomas during the pandemic. Telemedicine was more commonly utilized by patients with a history of skin cancer during the pandemic.

In the future, virtual care may help limit advanced stages of skin cancer by serving as a viable alternative to in-person care.6 It has been reported that telemedicine can serve as a useful triage service reducing patient wait times.7 Teledermatology should not replace in-person care, as there is no evidence of the diagnostic accuracy of this service and many patients still will need to be seen in-person for confirmation of their diagnosis and potential biopsy. Further studies are needed to assess for missed skin cancer diagnoses due to the utilization of telemedicine.

Limitations of this study included a self-reported history of skin cancer, β coefficients that may suggest a high degree of collinearity, and lack of specific survey questions regarding dermatologic care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further long-term studies exploring the clinical applicability and diagnostic accuracy of virtual medicine visits for cutaneous malignancies are vital, as teledermatology may play an essential role in curbing rising skin cancer rates even beyond the pandemic.

To the Editor:

The most common malignancy in the United States is skin cancer, with melanoma accounting for the majority of skin cancer deaths.1 Despite the lack of established guidelines for routine total-body skin examinations, many patients regularly visit their dermatologist for assessment of pigmented skin lesions.2 During the COVID-19 pandemic, many patients were unable to attend in-person dermatology visits, which resulted in many high-risk individuals not receiving care or alternatively seeking virtual care for cutaneous lesions.3 There has been a lack of research in the United States exploring the utilization of teledermatology during the pandemic and its overall impact on the care of patients with a history of skin cancer. We explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care for patients with skin cancer in a large US population.

Characteristics of Adults (≥18 Years) With and Without a History of Skin Cancera  in 2020-2021 NHIS (N=46,679)

Characteristics of Adults (≥18 Years) With and Without a History of Skin Cancera  in 2020-2021 NHIS (N=46,679)

Using anonymous survey data from the 2020-2021 National Health Interview Survey,4 we conducted a ­population-based, cross-sectional study to evaluate access to care during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients with a self-reported history of skin cancer—melanoma, nonmelanoma skin cancer, or unknown skin cancer. The 3 outcome variables included having a virtual medical appointment in the past 12 months (yes/no), delaying medical care due to the COVID-19 pandemic (yes/no), and not receiving care due to the COVID-19 pandemic (yes/no). Multivariable logistic regression models evaluating the relationship between a history of skin cancer and access to care were constructed using Stata/MP 17.0 (StataCorp LLC). We controlled for patient age; education; race/ethnicity; received public assistance or welfare payments; sex; region; US citizenship status; health insurance status; comorbidities including history of hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia; and birthplace in the United States in the logistic regression models.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis for Individuals With a History of Skin Cancer

Our analysis included 46,679 patients aged 18 years or older, of whom 3.4% (weighted)(n=2204) reported a history of skin cancer (eTable 1). The weighted percentage was calculated using National Health Interview Survey design parameters (accounting for the multistage sampling design) to represent the general US population. Compared with those with no history of skin cancer, patients with a history of skin cancer were significantly more likely to delay medical care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.21-1.54; P<.001) or not receive care (AOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16-1.57; P<.001) due to the pandemic and were more likely to have had a virtual medical visit in the past 12 months (AOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.26; P=.05). Additionally, subgroup analysis revealed that females were more likely than males to forego medical care (eTable 2). β Coefficients for independent and dependent variables were further analyzed using logistic regression (eTable 3).

β Coefficientsa  for Dependent Variables in Regression Models

After adjusting for various potential confounders including comorbidities, our results revealed that patients with a history of skin cancer reported that they were less likely to receive in-person medical care due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as high-risk individuals with a history of skin cancer may have stopped receiving total-body skin examinations and dermatology care during the pandemic. Our findings showed that patients with a history of skin cancer were more likely than those without skin cancer to delay or forego care due to the pandemic, which may contribute to a higher incidence of advanced-stage melanomas postpandemic. Trepanowski et al5 reported an increased incidence of patients presenting with more advanced melanomas during the pandemic. Telemedicine was more commonly utilized by patients with a history of skin cancer during the pandemic.

In the future, virtual care may help limit advanced stages of skin cancer by serving as a viable alternative to in-person care.6 It has been reported that telemedicine can serve as a useful triage service reducing patient wait times.7 Teledermatology should not replace in-person care, as there is no evidence of the diagnostic accuracy of this service and many patients still will need to be seen in-person for confirmation of their diagnosis and potential biopsy. Further studies are needed to assess for missed skin cancer diagnoses due to the utilization of telemedicine.

Limitations of this study included a self-reported history of skin cancer, β coefficients that may suggest a high degree of collinearity, and lack of specific survey questions regarding dermatologic care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further long-term studies exploring the clinical applicability and diagnostic accuracy of virtual medicine visits for cutaneous malignancies are vital, as teledermatology may play an essential role in curbing rising skin cancer rates even beyond the pandemic.

References
  1. Guy GP Jr, Thomas CC, Thompson T, et al. Vital signs: melanoma incidence and mortality trends and projections—United States, 1982-2030. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:591-596.
  2. Whiteman DC, Olsen CM, MacGregor S, et al; QSkin Study. The effect of screening on melanoma incidence and biopsy rates. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187:515-522. doi:10.1111/bjd.21649
  3. Jobbágy A, Kiss N, Meznerics FA, et al. Emergency use and efficacy of an asynchronous teledermatology system as a novel tool for early diagnosis of skin cancer during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:2699. doi:10.3390/ijerph19052699
  4. National Center for Health Statistics. NHIS Data, Questionnaires and Related Documentation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Accessed April 19, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/data-questionnaires-documentation.htm
  5. Trepanowski N, Chang MS, Zhou G, et al. Delays in melanoma presentation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide multi-institutional cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87:1217-1219. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.031
  6. Chiru MR, Hindocha S, Burova E, et al. Management of the two-week wait pathway for skin cancer patients, before and during the pandemic: is virtual consultation an option? J Pers Med. 2022;12:1258. doi:10.3390/jpm12081258
  7. Finnane A, Dallest K, Janda M, et al. Teledermatology for the diagnosis and management of skin cancer: a systematic review. JAMA ­Dermatol. 2017;153:319-327. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4361
References
  1. Guy GP Jr, Thomas CC, Thompson T, et al. Vital signs: melanoma incidence and mortality trends and projections—United States, 1982-2030. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:591-596.
  2. Whiteman DC, Olsen CM, MacGregor S, et al; QSkin Study. The effect of screening on melanoma incidence and biopsy rates. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187:515-522. doi:10.1111/bjd.21649
  3. Jobbágy A, Kiss N, Meznerics FA, et al. Emergency use and efficacy of an asynchronous teledermatology system as a novel tool for early diagnosis of skin cancer during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:2699. doi:10.3390/ijerph19052699
  4. National Center for Health Statistics. NHIS Data, Questionnaires and Related Documentation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Accessed April 19, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/data-questionnaires-documentation.htm
  5. Trepanowski N, Chang MS, Zhou G, et al. Delays in melanoma presentation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide multi-institutional cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87:1217-1219. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.031
  6. Chiru MR, Hindocha S, Burova E, et al. Management of the two-week wait pathway for skin cancer patients, before and during the pandemic: is virtual consultation an option? J Pers Med. 2022;12:1258. doi:10.3390/jpm12081258
  7. Finnane A, Dallest K, Janda M, et al. Teledermatology for the diagnosis and management of skin cancer: a systematic review. JAMA ­Dermatol. 2017;153:319-327. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4361
Issue
Cutis - 113(5)
Issue
Cutis - 113(5)
Page Number
208-209,E1-E4
Page Number
208-209,E1-E4
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Care for Patients With Skin Cancer
Display Headline
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Care for Patients With Skin Cancer
Sections
Inside the Article

PRACTICE POINTS

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the landscape of medicine, as many individuals are now utilizing telemedicine to receive care.
  • Many individuals will continue to receive telemedicine moving forward, making it crucial to understand access to care.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media