Case Reports

Crizotinib-Induced Lichenoid Drug Eruption in a Patient With Lung Cancer

Author and Disclosure Information

Crizotinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2011 for the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)– or ROS1-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since then, the number of indicated uses for crizotinib has substantially increased. However, the administration of crizotinib can be associated with various adverse events. It is important that clinicians identify adverse cutaneous manifestations of crizotinib and are aware of their outcomes and treatments to avoid unnecessarily discontinuing a potentially life-saving medication. We describe a case of lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) that appeared 4 weeks after initiation of treatment with crizotinib in a 61-year-old man with ALK-positive metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.

Practice Points

  • Cutaneous lichenoid drug eruptions (LDEs) and photosensitive rash may be caused by crizotinib.
  • The clinical morphology of LDE may resemble lichen planus, but certain features, such as larger skin lesions, the absence of Wickham striae, and photodistribution, help to differentiate between the two.


 

References

Crizotinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met), and their oncogenic variants ALK fusion proteins or c-Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor mutant variants.1 Additionally, crizotinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2011 for the treatment of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors are echinoderm microtubule-associated proteinlike 4 (EML4)/ALK or ROS1 positive.2,3 Among unselected populations of patients with NSCLC, the frequency of EML4/ALK rearrangements ranges from 1.5% to 6.7%.1 Crizotinib is superior to standard chemotherapy in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.2

In clinical trials, adverse reactions (grades 1 to 4) to crizotinib occurring in at least 25% of patients included visual disturbances, gastrointestinal tract disorders, fatigue, and pitting edema.1,2,4 Adverse reactions (grades 3 and 4) occurring in more than 5% of patients included elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, dyspnea, pneumonia, and neutropenia.1,4 Although the incidence of dermatologic adverse reactions is approximately 11%, substantial progression of drug eruptions rarely has been reported.2,5 We describe a case of lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) that appeared 4 weeks after initiation of crizotinib treatment in a patient with ALK-positive metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.

Case Report

A 61-year-old man presented with a history of ALK-positive NSCLC with lung-to-lung metastasis and pleural seeding treated with a right lower lobectomy and chemotherapy 9 years prior. Chemotherapy was reattempted 5 years later. Targeted therapy with gefitinib was initiated following the lobectomy and 5 years later with erlotinib. The NSCLC was stable, as indicated by computed tomography performed once every 3 or 6 months. After 5 years of treatment, follow-up computed tomography showed slowly growing nodular shadows in the right middle and lower lung fields. Due to this disease progression, treatment with crizotinib (250 mg twice daily) was initiated. Four weeks after the initiation of crizotinib therapy, mild itchy skin eruptions developed on all extremities and the lower lip. He also reported that the skin lesions became more itchy and red with sun exposure. He had no history of drug allergies and denied taking any other medications.

Physical examination revealed multiple brown to violaceous, slightly scaly, flat-topped polygonal papules or plaques on both lower legs (Figure 1A), dorsal hands (Figure 1B), and extensor sites of the elbows, as well as lacelike fine white lines on the lower lip (Figure 1C). There were no nail lesions. The patient’s dermatologic history was unremarkable, except for a few vitiligo lesions on the dorsal hands, extensor sites of the elbows, and mouth angles diagnosed 20 years earlier.

Figure1

Figure 1. Multiple ill-defined, brown to violaceous, slightly scaly, flat-topped polygonal papules or plaques on the left lower leg (A) and right dorsal hand (B) as well as lacelike fine white lines on the lower lip (C).

A skin biopsy from the right dorsal hand revealed a lichenoid infiltrate in the superficial dermis composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes and scattered eosinophils, focal parakeratosis, focal hypergranulosis, mild acanthosis, and basal vacuolization (Figure 2A). In addition, some dyskeratotic keratinocytes in the stratum spinosum and granulosum were identified (Figure 2B). The histopathology was consistent with the diagnosis of an LDE. Direct immunofluorescence revealed no globular or cytoid body–like deposits of immunoglobulin, with IgM, IgA, IgG, or C3 in the epidermis, dermis, and basement membrane zone. Routine laboratory studies revealed elevated liver enzymes, including an ALT level of 115 U/L (reference range, 0–40 U/L) and AST level of 60 U/L (reference range, 5–45 U/L). Negative results for the serum hepatitis B surface antigen and anti– hepatitis C virus tests were recorded. The patient had no medical history of alcohol consumption or abnormal liver function tests. The skin lesions were treated with diflucortolone valerate fatty ointment 0.1% twice daily and abnormal liver functions were treated with silymarin (150 mg per cap twice daily). He experienced some improvement.

Figure2

Figure 2. Histopathology showed a lichenoid infiltrate in the superficial dermis composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes and scattered eosinophils, focal parakeratosis, focal hypergranulosis, mild acanthosis, and basal vacuolization (A)(H&E, original magnification ×100). Some dyskeratotic keratinocytes were identified in the stratum spinosum and granulosum (B)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

A causality assessment was performed using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale,6,7 and we concluded that crizotinib was the possible cause (Naranjo score, 4) of this adverse drug reaction (Table). Because the skin reaction was tolerable and liver enzymes were mildly elevated (ALT, 50 U/L; AST, 48 U/L), the offending drug was continued to benefit the underlying disease. His NSCLC was stable on computed tomography 3 months later.

Pages

Recommended Reading

A Rare Case of Primary Cutaneous Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Leg Type
MDedge Dermatology
Reflectance confocal microscopy: The future looks bright
MDedge Dermatology
Skin signs may be good omens during cancer therapy
MDedge Dermatology
Acral Cutaneous Metastasis From a Primary Breast Carcinoma Following Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel
MDedge Dermatology
FDA approves cemiplimab for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
MDedge Dermatology
Leukemia Cutis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Signifies a Poor Prognosis
MDedge Dermatology
Primary Cutaneous Apocrine Carcinoma Arising Within a Nevus Sebaceus
MDedge Dermatology
Cutaneous Angiosarcoma of the Lower Leg
MDedge Dermatology
Cross-contamination of Pathology Specimens: A Cautionary Tale
MDedge Dermatology
Mohs Micrographic Surgery Overlying a Pacemaker
MDedge Dermatology