Q&A

MR angiography effective for diagnosing carotid artery stenosis

Author and Disclosure Information

  • BACKGROUND: Major randomized trials have demonstrated the benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. This meta-analysis compared duplex ultrasound with MRA and the gold standard, digital subtraction angiography. Because digital subtraction angiography is the standard reference for selecting surgical patients, a noninvasive test with less morbidity and mortality would be preferable.
  • POPULATION STUDIED: This meta-analysis included 62 articles yielding 85 separate study populations screened for carotid stenosis with MRA or duplex ultrasound. No information regarding the age, race, or comorbid disorders was given; therefore, it is unknown whether the study population is comparable to a typical family practice setting.
  • STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: The authors performed a literature search on PubMed using the keywords “carotid artery” and “angiography” combined with “magnetic resonance” and/or “duplex” or “ultrasound.” Additional articles were obtained using the reference lists of original and review publications. Only articles published in English between 1994 and 2001 were included in the search. They also directly contacted authors when data reporting was not sufficient for their analysis.
  • OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcomes measured where pooled sensitivities and specificities for MRA and duplex ultrasound. No patient-oriented outcomes were measured in this study.
  • RESULTS: At a prevalence rate of 1%, MRA showed a sensitivity of 95% with a specificity of 90% (positive likelihood ratio [LR+]=9.5; negative likelihood ratio [LR–]=0.06) for severe stenosis, while duplex ultrasound demonstrated a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 87% (LR+ = 6.6; LR– = 0.2). Both MRA and duplex ultrasound were nearly 100% sensitive and specific at determining complete occlusion of the carotid arteries.


 

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is better than duplex ultrasound for diagnosing severe (70%–99%) carotid artery stenosis. Both tests are highly accurate for diagnosing total carotid artery occlusion.

Whether this advantage translates into improved patient outcomes is not known. While cost was not addressed in this study, MRA is 2 to 3 times more expensive than duplex ultrasound.

If cost and effectiveness data support these results, then MRA and duplex ultrasound might replace digital subtraction angiography for carotid artery surgery selection.

Recommended Reading

How should patients with mitral regurgitation be followed?
MDedge Family Medicine
Immediate- vs extended-release metoprolol in heart failure
MDedge Family Medicine
ACE inhibitors are better than diuretics for treatment of hypertension in the elderly
MDedge Family Medicine
Not all fish products prevent heart disease
MDedge Family Medicine
Low-carbohydrate diet effective for adults
MDedge Family Medicine
Ephedra and ephedrine: Modest short-term weight loss, with a price
MDedge Family Medicine
Low-dose warfarin prevents recurrent thromboembolism
MDedge Family Medicine
Do irbesartan and amlodipine reduce cardiovascular events in diabetic patients?
MDedge Family Medicine
Selective aldosterone blockade reduces mortality after MI
MDedge Family Medicine
Diagnosing coronary heart disease: When to use stress imaging studies
MDedge Family Medicine