Q&A

Warfarin started at 10 mg achieves therapeutic INR faster than 5 mg

Author and Disclosure Information

  • BACKGROUND: Though not frequently undertaken by family physicians, the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism is now common in the outpatient setting. Patients are treated with a low-molecular-weight heparin, and warfarin is initiated within 24 hours.
  • POPULATION STUDIED: Researchers at 4 Canadian thrombosis clinics enrolled 201 outpatients with confirmed acute venous thromboembolism. Patients ranged in age from 18 to 98 years (mean, 55.5 years), 16% being older than 75 years. After randomization, baseline characteristics of both treatment groups were similar, although the 10-mg group included more men.
  • STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive warfarin induction using either a modified, previously developed nomogram1 starting with 5 mg on the 2 days (n=97) or a new nomogram starting with 10 mg on the first 2 days (n=104). Warfarin was started on the first day of treatment with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin, which was continued for at least 5 days until a therapeutic INR was achieved. Subsequent doses of warfarin were determined from the respective nomograms. INR values were checked on days 3, 4, and 5 in all patients, although the 10-mg nomogram did not require an INR on day 4. Patients were followed for 90 days.
  • OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome was time in days to a therapeutic INR (>1.9). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with an INR between 2.0 and 3.0 on day 5, total number of INR measurements, incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding, and survival.
  • RESULTS: Patients in the 10-mg group achieved a therapeutic INR 1.4 days earlier than those in the 5-mg group (P<.001) and many more patients in the 10-mg group than in the 5-mg group achieved a therapeutic INR by day 5 (83% vs. 46%; P<.001; number needed to treat=2.7). As a result, fewer INR assessments were performed in the 10-mg group than in the 5-mg group (8.1 vs. 9.1; P=.04). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in recurrent venous thrombotic events, major bleeding episodes (1 in each group), or survival over the 90 days of follow-up, though the study was not large enough to find a small difference in rates if one exists.


 

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

Starting warfarin with 10 mg rather than 5 mg achieves a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) >1.9 one day earlier (4.2 vs 5.6 days) in selected outpatients at low risk for major bleeding complications with confirmed acute venous thromboembolism.

This strategy saves the time and expense of 1 daily INR determination, and it may decrease the number of days that low-molecular-weight heparin is required by 1 day— although all patients in this study, due to the nature of the design, received a minimum of 5 days of low-molecular-weight heparin.

No conclusions regarding differences in safety or efficacy between the 10-mg and 5-mg nomogram can be drawn from the results of this study, as it was underpowered to detect differences in these important endpoints.

Recommended Reading

How should patients with mitral regurgitation be followed?
MDedge Family Medicine
Immediate- vs extended-release metoprolol in heart failure
MDedge Family Medicine
ACE inhibitors are better than diuretics for treatment of hypertension in the elderly
MDedge Family Medicine
Not all fish products prevent heart disease
MDedge Family Medicine
Low-carbohydrate diet effective for adults
MDedge Family Medicine
Ephedra and ephedrine: Modest short-term weight loss, with a price
MDedge Family Medicine
Low-dose warfarin prevents recurrent thromboembolism
MDedge Family Medicine
Do irbesartan and amlodipine reduce cardiovascular events in diabetic patients?
MDedge Family Medicine
Selective aldosterone blockade reduces mortality after MI
MDedge Family Medicine
Diagnosing coronary heart disease: When to use stress imaging studies
MDedge Family Medicine