Can scribes boost FPs’ efficiency and job satisfaction?

,; ,; ,; ,; ,; ,

Original Research

Can scribes boost FPs’ efficiency and job satisfaction?

J Fam Pract. 2017 April;66(4):206-208,210-214

Stephen T. Earls, MD

Judith A. Savageau, MPH

Susan Begley, MBA

Barry G. Saver, MD, MPH

Kate Sullivan, BA

Alan Chuman, MPH

Yes, the evidence suggests that they can. This pilot study found that the use of scribes improved both, without negatively affecting the patient experience.

PDF Download

References

1. Walker K, Ben-Meir M, O’Mullane P, et al. Scribes in an Australian private emergency department: a description of physician productivity. Emerg Med Australas. 2014;26:543-548.

2. Arya R, Salovich DM, Ohman-Strickland P, et al. Impact of scribes on performance indicators in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:490-494.

3. Expanded scribe role boosts staff morale. ED Manag. 2009;21:75-77.

4. Scribes, EMR please docs, save $600,000. ED Manag. 2009;21:117-118.

5. Bastani A, Shaqiri B, Palomba K, et al. An ED scribe program is able to improve throughput time and patient satisfaction. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:399-402.

6. Cabilan CJ, Eley RM. Review article: potential of medical scribes to allay the burden of documentation and enhance efficiency in Australian emergency departments. Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Aug 13. [Epub ahead of print]

7. Hegstrom L, Leslie J, Hutchinson E, et al. Medical scribes: are scribe programs cost effective in an outpatient MFM setting? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:S240.

8. Campbell LL, Case D, Crocker JE, et al. Using medical scribes in a physician practice. J AHIMA. 2012;83:64-69.

9. Koshy S, Feustel PJ, Hong M, et al. Scribes in an ambulatory urology practice: patient and physician satisfaction. J Urol. 2010;184:258-262.

10. Hafner K. A busy doctor’s right hand, ever ready to type. The New York Times. January 12, 2014. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/14/health/a-busy-doctors-right-hand-ever-ready-to-type.html?_r=0. Accessed February 6, 2017.

11. Brady K, Shariff A. Virtual medical scribes: making electronic medical records work for you. J Med Pract Manage. 2013;29:133-136.

12. Baugh R, Jones JE, Troff K, et al. Medical scribes. J Med Pract Manage. 2012;28:195-197.

13. Grimshaw H. Physician scribes improve productivity. Oak Street Medical allows doctors to spend more face time with patients, improve job satisfaction. MGMA Connex. 2012;12:27-28.

14. Morehead Associates, Inc. UMassMemorial Health Care: Physician Satisfaction Survey. 2013.

15. Konrad TR, Williams ES, Linzer M, et al. Measuring physician job satisfaction in a changing workplace and challenging environment. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999;37:1174-1182.

16. Howard KA, Helé K, Salibi N, et al. BTW Informing change. Blue Shield of California Foundation. Adapting the EHR scribe model to community health centers: the experience of Shasta Community Health Center’s pilot. Available at: http://informingchange.com/cat-publications/adapting-the-ehr-scribe-model-to-community-health-centers-the-experience-of-shasta-community-health-centers-pilot. Accessed November 6, 2015.

ABSTRACT

Purpose Research in other medical specialties has shown that the addition of medical scribes to the clinical team enhances physicians’ practice experience and increases productivity. To date, literature on the implementation of scribes in primary care is limited. To determine the feasibility and benefits of implementing scribes in family medicine, we undertook a pilot mixed-method quality improvement (QI) study.

Methods In 2014, we incorporated 4 part-time scribes into an academic family medicine practice consisting of 7 physicians. We then measured, via survey and time-tracking data, the impact the scribes had on physician office hours and productivity, time spent on documentation, perceptions of work-life balance, and physician and patient satisfaction.

Results Six of the 7 faculty physicians participated. This study demonstrated that the use of scribes in a busy academic primary care practice substantially reduced the amount of time that family physicians spent on charting, improved work-life balance, and had good patient acceptance. Specifically, the physicians spent an average of 5.1 fewer hours/week (hrs/wk) on documentation, while various measures of productivity revealed increases ranging from 9.2% to 28.8%. Perhaps most important of all, when the results of the pilot study were annualized, they were projected to generate $168,600 per year—more than twice the $79,500 annual cost of 2 full-time equivalent scribes.

Surveys assessing work-life balance demonstrated improvement in the physicians’ perception of the administrative burden/paperwork related to practice and a decrease in their perception of the extent to which work encroached on their personal lives. In addition, survey data from 313 patients at the time of their ambulatory visit with a scribe present revealed a high level of comfort. Likewise, surveys completed by physicians after 55 clinical sessions (ie, blocks of consecutive, uninterrupted patient appointments; there are usually 2 sessions per day) revealed good to excellent ratings more than 90% of the time.

Conclusion In an outpatient family medicine clinic, the use of scribes substantially improved physicians’ efficiency, job satisfaction, and productivity without negatively impacting the patient experience.