Conference Coverage

Survey: More than half of gynecologic oncologists altered morcellation practices


 

AT THE AAGL GLOBAL CONGRESS

ORLANDO – Following the Food and Drug Administration’s 2014 warning against use of laparoscopic uterine power morcellation, 13% of gynecologic oncologists decreased their use of the technique and another 39% discontinued it altogether, according to survey responses from 199 members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

About 41% of gynecologic oncologists changed their surgical technique to minimally invasive without power morcellation. Another 20% of respondents who previously used power morcellation have switched to laparotomy.

A more rigorous informed consent process, better attention to patient selection, and enhanced protocols are positive effects emerging since the FDA Safety Communication was issued in April 2014, Dr. Falk said at the meeting sponsored by AAGL.

The 34-item survey included questions about demographics, institutional policies, and attitudes before and after the FDA warning. Among the respondents, 65% were men. Both “early” and “very seasoned” surgeons participated in the survey. The majority of the respondents were moderate- to high-volume surgeons.

Men were significantly more likely to decrease or discontinue use of power morcellation, compared with women (P = .0015). Region of practice, years in practice, or institution type did not significantly influence changes in practice. “Most said it was not a personal choice, but more about patient choice or an institutional policy change,” Dr. Falk said.

There is still a role for power morcellation in carefully selected patients, Dr. Falk added.

In July 2014, AAGL issued a statement in response to the FDA warning, stating that “we should improve but not abandon power morcellation, and that power morcellation with appropriate informed consent should remain available to appropriately screened, low-risk women.” In addition, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists stated, “Although the worsening of an occult malignancy as a result of power morcellation is, of course, tragic, we believe that an approach that combines deliberate patient selection criteria with robust informed consent will help protect women from a negative outcome, while maintaining access to morcellation for women who would benefit from it.”

Dr. Falk is not a coauthor on the study. He presented the findings on behalf of a colleague unable to attend the meeting. Dr. Falk reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Recommended Reading

Better survival with primary surgery in stage IIIC ovarian ca
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA, ACOG recommend against using ovarian cancer screening tests
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Rise in HPV vaccination spurs CIN drop
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Laparoscopic hysterectomy best in morbidly obese uterine cancer patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
For HPV-negative women, longer screening intervals are effective
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
No rise in complications with concomitant gynecologic cancer, PFD surgery
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
PARP inhibitor prolongs PFS in ovarian cancer patients with and without BRCA mutations
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CMS offering educational webinars on MACRA
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Subgroup may benefit from seribantumab for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ASTRO guidelines lower age thresholds for APBI
MDedge Hematology and Oncology