Conference Coverage

Panobinostat combos can treat rel/ref MM


 

Crowd at ASCO 2015

©ASCO/Rodney White

CHICAGO—Combination regimens including the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat can produce durable responses and prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), according to research presented at the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting.

In a phase 2 trial, panobinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone produced durable responses, even in high-risk, lenalidomide-refractory MM patients.

In a phase 3 trial, panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone led to a 7.8-month improvement in median PFS over placebo-bortezomib-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM who had received 2 or more prior regimens.

Both studies were sponsored by Novartis, the company developing panobinostat.

PANORAMA-1 substudy

PANORAMA-1 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 768 MM patients. Overall, panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone led to a clinically relevant and statistically significant increase in PFS of about 4 months compared to placebo-bortezomib-dexamethasone.

At ASCO, Jesús San Miguel, MD, of Clínica Universidad de Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, presented the results of an exploratory analysis of 147 patients in this trial (abstract 8526*).

The patients had relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM and had received 2 or more prior regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD).

Disease and treatment characteristics were as follows:

Panobinostat

(n=73)

Placebo (n=74)
Disease

characteristics, n (%)

Relapsed 39 (53) 30 (41)
Relapsed/refractory 34 (47) 43 (58)
Prior

therapies, n (%)

Bortezomib 73 (100) 74 (100)
Lenalidomide 28 (38) 37 (50)
Thalidomide 63 (86) 50 (68)
Bortezomib

+ lenalidomide

28 (38) 37 (50)
Bortezomib

+ dexamethasone

69 (95) 74 (100)
Prior

autologous transplant, n (%)

54 (74) 47 (64)
Median

prior lines of therapy (range)

3 (2-4) 3 (2-3)

The median PFS was 12.5 months in the panobinostat arm, compared to 4.7 months in the placebo arm. Treatment with panobinostat also led to an increase in complete/near complete response rates (21.9% vs 8.1%) and overall response rate (58.9% vs 39.2%).

Common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, included diarrhea (33.3% vs 15.1%), asthenia/fatigue (26.4% vs 13.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (16.7% vs 6.8%).

The most common grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities in the panobinostat arm and placebo arm, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (68.1% vs 44.4%), lymphopenia (48.6% vs 49.3%), and neutropenia (40.3% vs 16.4%).

The percentage of on-treatment deaths was similar between the treatment arms (6.9% vs 6.8%).

“These data provide physicians with a better understanding of the clinical use of panobinostat, an HDAC inhibitor, a promising new drug class for this difficult-to-treat patient population with a high unmet need,” Dr San Miguel said.

Phase 2 trial

Ajai Chari, MD, of Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York, presented the results of a phase 2 study of panobinostat with lenalidomide and weekly dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (abstract 8528*).

There were 20 evaluable patients with a median age of 64 (range, 51-75). They had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-10). Prior regimens were as follows:

Prior

therapy

Exposed/Refractory, n (%)
Dexamethasone 20 (100)/9

(45)

Thalidomide 6 (30)/2

(10)

Lenalidomide

20

(100)/15 (75)

Pomalidomide 7 (35)/7

(35)

Bortezomib 20 (100)/9

(45)

Carfilzomib 6 (30)/6

(30)

Autologous

transplant

15 (75)

For this study, patients received panobinostat (20 mg on days 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, and 19), lenalidomide (25 mg on days 1-21), and dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, and 15).

The overall response rate was 45%. This included 1 complete response, 3 very good partial responses, 5 partial responses, and 8 minimal responses. Two patients had stable disease, and 1 progressed.

Among lenalidomide-refractory patients (n=16), the overall response rate was 38%. This included 3 very good partial responses, 3 partial responses, and 7 minimal responses. Two patients had stable disease, and 1 progressed.

The median PFS was 6.5 months overall and among lenalidomide-refractory patients.

Grade 3/4 toxicities were primarily hematologic, including neutropenia (55%), thrombocytopenia (40%), and anemia (5%). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events included infections (n=4), diarrhea (n=3), pulmonary emboli (n=2), neck pain (n=1), QTc prolongation (n=1), fatigue (n=1), and weight loss (n=1).

“In relapsed/refractory MM patients, panobinostat in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone demonstrated durable responses comparable to other recently approved agents, even in lenalidomide-refractory patients with high-risk molecular findings,” Dr Chari said.

“In notable contrast to PANORAMA-1 results, this completely oral regimen is well-tolerated, with no grade 3/4 [gastrointestinal] toxicities and primarily expected hematologic toxicities.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

Recommended Reading

Triple therapy added toxicity without survival benefit in multiple myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ASCO: Transplant boosts stringent complete response rate in newly diagnosed myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Carfilzomib/dex doubles PFS of relapsed myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Harnessing immune defense to treat Candida infection
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CAR T-cell therapy seems feasible for NHL, MM
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Genome mapping provides insight into MM
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Biochemist Irwin Rose dies at 88
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cancer survivors mirror spouses’ moods
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
BCL-2 inhibitor shows potential for treating MM
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Single agent can treat resistant MM
MDedge Hematology and Oncology