From the Journals

Combo therapy with melflufen promising in small r/r multiple myeloma study


 

FROM THE LANCET HEMATOLOGY

Small phase 1 and phase 2 multi-center, open label studies of melflufen toxicity and efficacy in combination with dexamethasone showed significant benefits in overall response rate in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. A report on these studies was published in Lancet Hematology.

Nephron/Wikimedia Commons

The studies enrolled patients aged 18 years and older with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), who had received two or more previous lines of therapy and were refractory to their last line of therapy. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less.

Phase 1 was a dose-tolerance study of 23 patients, which found that the maximum tolerated dose tested of intravenous infusion of melflufen was 40 mg for 30 min on day 1 in 21-day cycles plus oral dexamethasone at 40 mg weekly.

In phase 2, 45 patients were tested at the maximum tolerated dose (40 mg) identified in phase 1 in combination with dexamethasone and 13 patients were treated with melflufen as a single agent (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01897714). The single-agent arm of the study was discontinued for ethical reasons once evidence became available of the benefit of combination therapy in comparison.

In phase 2, patients treated with combination therapy achieved an overall response rate of 31% (14/45 patients) and a clinical benefit rate of 49% (22/45 patients). In the phase 2 single-agent cohort, the overall response rate was 8% (1/13 patients) and the clinical benefit rate was 23% (3/13 patients) before this aspect of the study was discontinued.

In terms of adverse events, among the 45 phase 2 combination–treatment patients, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were clinically manageable thrombocytopenia (62% of patients) and neutropenia (58%) In addition, 24 serious adverse events were reported in 38% patients, most commonly pneumonia (11%).

Because of the benefits seen and the need for relapsed/refractory MM treatments, further studies on melflufen in combination therapies are ongoing, according to the researchers “with encouraging early results to date”: NCT03151811, NCT02963493, and NCT03481556.

“Melflufen represents a novel treatment concept with a unique mechanism of action that might find future use in combinations with key partners, such as proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies,” the researchers concluded.

The study was sponsored by Oncopeptides AB. The authors received funding from a variety of pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Richardson PG et al. Lancet Hematol. 2020; doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30044-2.

Recommended Reading

CRISPR-engineered T cells may be safe for cancer, but do they work?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
New CAR T-cell therapy eliminates MM and tumor propagating cells without fratricide in lab study
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves new drug for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Stored CD34 cells for multiple myeloma patients largely unused
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Fracture risk for MM patients remains higher despite improvements in treatments, survival
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Multiple myeloma treatment produces a similar survival benefit in very elderly patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Maintaining cancer care in the face of COVID-19
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
First report of MM patient successfully treated for COVID-19 with tocilizumab
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Frailty indexes fail in sorting elderly MM patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ASH tackles COVID-19 with hematology-related FAQ, promotes new registries
MDedge Hematology and Oncology