Original Report

An analysis of the variability of breakthrough pain intensity in patients with cancer


 

Background The management of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer (BTPc) generally includes an initial titration of breakthrough pain medication to an effective dose, followed by the use of that dose in all subsequent episodes. This strategy presumes that an individual patient has a degree of consistency of pain during repeat episodes; however, that presumption has not been formally assessed.

Objective To examine the variation in pain intensity of BTPc episodes within individual patients and across patients.

Methods Data were pooled from 2 randomized, double-blind, crossover studies that used fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS) vs comparator to relieve BTPc. Eligible patients were adults with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2 and adequately controlled background pain. The FPNS dose was titrated prior to a double-blind treatment consisting of 10 episodes. Pain intensity was reported on an 11-point numeric scale in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Inter- and intrapatient variabilities of baseline pain intensity scores per episode were analyzed by analysis of covariance via a mixed-effect model. The influences of demographics and ECOG grade at study entry were assessed.

Results Mean baseline pain intensity score was 7.3 (standard deviation, 1.76; range, 2-10) across 1,399 BTPc episodes in 152 patients. The interpatient variability of baseline pain intensity scores was 75.96%; intrapatient variability was 20.64%. Fixed terms for demographics and ECOG grade did not significantly influence baseline pain intensity score (≤ 5% level).

Limitations This was a post hoc analysis.

Conclusions Baseline pain intensity scores during episodes of BTPc vary widely between patients, but vary little within individual patients; this supports the use of a consistent maintenance dosage of analgesia for BTPc, once it has been titrated to an effective dose.

Funding/Support The study was funded by Archimedes Development Ltd.

*To read the full article, click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction.

Recommended Reading

Bridging the gap: a palliative care consultation service in a hematological malignancy–bone marrow transplant unit
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Randomized trial of vitamin B6 for preventing hand-foot syndrome from capecitabine chemotherapy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
U.K. ahead of U.S.A. in cancer survivorship planning
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Recognize the range of skin reactions to EGFR inhibitors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
VIDEO: How to improve cancer survivorship planning
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Targeted cancer therapies pose unique perioperative challenges
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Patients on palliative chemo more likely to undergo intensive care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Obesity-hunger paradox prevalent in low-income cancer survivors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Implementation of an oncology exercise and wellness rehabilitation program to enhance survivorship: the Beaumont Health System experience
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
From our pages to your practice
MDedge Hematology and Oncology