Evidence-Based Reviews

Real-world challenges in managing ‘dual diagnosis’ patients

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Although underutilization of pharmacotherapy is a pitfall to be avoided in the treatment of patients with dual disorders, medication overutilization can be just as problematic. Patients with dual disorders are sometimes singularly focused on resolving acute anxiety, depression, or psychosis at the expense of working towards sobriety.33 Although the “self-medication hypothesis” is frequently invoked by patients and clinicians alike to suggest that substance use occurs in the service of “treating” underlying disorders,34 this theory has not been well supported in studies.35-37 Some patients may pledge dedication to abstinence, but still pressure physicians for a pharmacologic solution to their suffering. With expanding legalization of cannabis for both recreational and medical purposes, patients are increasingly seeking doctors’ recommendations for “medical marijuana” for a wide range of complaints, despite the fact that data supporting a therapeutic role for cannabis in the treatment of mental illness is sparse,38 whereas the potential harm in terms of either causing or worsening psychosis is well established.39,40 Clinicians must be knowledgeable about the abuse potential of prescribed medications, ranging from sleep aids, analgesics, and muscle relaxants to antidepressants and antipsychotics, while also being mindful of the psychological meaningfulness of seeking, prescribing, and not prescribing medications.41

Although the simultaneous treatment of patients with dual disorders that includes pharmacotherapy for both SUDs and CODs is vital for optimizing clinical outcomes, clinicians should strive for diagnostic accuracy and use medications judiciously. In addition, although pharmacotherapy often is necessary to deliver evidence-based treatment for patients with dual disorders, it is inadequate as standalone treatment and should be administered along with psychosocial interventions within an integrated, multidisciplinary treatment setting.

The keys to optimal outcomes

The treatment of patients with dual disorders can be challenging, to say the least. Ideal, evidence-based therapy in the form of an IDDT program can be difficult for clinicians to implement and for patients to access. Best efforts to perform meticulous clinical assessment to clarify diagnoses, use pharmacotherapy judiciously, work collaboratively in a multidisciplinary setting, and optimize treatment given available resources are keys to clinical success.

Bottom Line

Ideal treatment of patients with dual disorders consists of simultaneous, integrated interventions delivered by a multidisciplinary team. However, in the real world, limited resources, diagnostic challenges, and both over- and underutilization of pharmacotherapy often hamper optimal treatment.

Related Resources

Pages

Recommended Reading

Legalization of marijuana debate moving away from medical need
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Drug-related deaths continue to rise in United States
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
N-acetylcysteine: A potential treatment for substance use disorders
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Do free meals to physicians affect opioid prescribing?
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
For some opioid overdose survivors, stigma from clinicians hinders recovery
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
How to prescribe effectively for opioid use disorder
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
More deliveries now include opioid use disorder
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Treating sleep disorders in chronic opioid users
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
CDC: 2017 worst year yet for drug overdoses
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Study examines the world of alcohol use
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management