Reports From the Field

A Service Evaluation of Acute Neurological Patients Managed on Clinically Inappropriate Wards


 

References

From Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Physiotherapy Department, Chichester, UK (Richard J. Holmes), and Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Occupational Therapy, Chichester, UK (Sophie Stratford).

Objective: Despite the benefits of early and frequent input from a neurologist, there is wide variation in the availability of this service, especially in district general hospitals, with many patients managed on clinically inappropriate wards. The purpose of this service evaluation was to explore the impact this had on patient care.

Methods: A retrospective service evaluation was undertaken at a National Health Service hospital by reviewing patient records over a 6-month period. Data related to demographics, processes within the patient’s care, and secondary complications were recorded. Findings were compared with those of stroke patients managed on a specialist stroke ward.

Results: A total of 63 patients were identified, with a mean age of 72 years. The mean length of stay was 25.9 days, with a readmission rate of 16.7%. Only 15.9% of patients were reviewed by a neurologist. There was a high rate of secondary complications, with a number of patients experiencing falls (11.1%), pressure ulcers (14.3%), and health care–acquired infections (33.3%) during their admission.

Conclusions: The lack of specialist input from a neurologist and the management of patients on clinically inappropriate wards may have negatively impacted length of stay, readmission rates, and the frequency of secondary complications.

Keywords: evaluation; clinical safety; neurology; patient-centered care; clinical outcomes; length of stay.

It is estimated that 10% of acute admissions to district general hospitals (DGHs) of the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom are due to a neurological problem other than stroke.1 In 2011, a joint report from the Royal College of Physicians and the Association of British Neurologists (ABN) recommended that all of these patients should be admitted under the care of a neurologist and be regularly reviewed by a neurologist during their admission.2 The rationale for this recommendation is clear. The involvement of a neurologist has been shown to improve accuracy of the diagnosis3 and significantly reduce length of stay.4,5 Studies have also shown that the involvement of a neurologist has led to a change in the management plan in as high as 79%6 to 89%3 of cases, suggesting that a high proportion of neurological patients not seen by a neurologist are being managed suboptimally.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Watch for abnormal movements in hospitalized COVID-19 patients
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Stroke is ‘not a common complication’ in COVID-19
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Infective endocarditis from IV drug use tied to hemorrhagic stroke
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Some MS treatments may heighten COVID risk
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Insomnia? Referral, drugs not usually needed
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
High teen BMI linked to stroke risk in young adulthood
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Race, ethnicity, and socioeconomics are often barriers to migraine care
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Healthy lifestyle can reduce dementia risk despite family history
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Large vessel stroke linked to AstraZeneca COVID vaccine
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
New AHA/ASA guideline on secondary stroke prevention
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management