Outcomes Research in Review

FFR-Guided or Angiography-Guided Nonculprit Lesion PCI in Patients With STEMI Without Cardiogenic Shock

Puymirat E, Cayla G, Simon T, et al. Multivessel PCI guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(4):297-308. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2104650


 

References

Study Overview

Objective. To determine whether fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of nonculprit lesion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is superior to angiography-guided PCI.

Design. Multicenter randomized control trial blinded to outcome, conducted in 41 sites in France.

Setting and participants. A total of 1163 patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary disease, who had undergone successful PCI to the culprit lesion were randomized to either FFR-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI for nonculprit lesions. Randomization was stratified according to the trial site and timing of the procedure (immediate or staged).

Main outcome measures. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization at 1 year.

Main results. At 1 year, the primary outcome occurred in 32 of 586 patients (5.5%) in the FFR-guided group and in 24 of 577 (4.2%) in the angiography-guided group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% CI, 0.78-2.23; P = .31). The rate of death (1.5% vs 1.7%), nonfatal MI (3.1% vs 1.7%), and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization (3.1% vs 1.7%) were also similar between FFR-guided and angiography-guided groups.

Conclusion. Among patients with STEMI and multivessel disease who had undergone successful PCI of the culprit vessel, an FFR-guided strategy for complete revascularization was not superior to angiography-guided strategy for reducing death, MI, or urgent revascularization at 1 year.

Commentary

Patients presenting with STEMI often have multivessel disease.1 Recently, multiple studies have reported the benefit of nonculprit vessel revascularization in patients presenting with hemodynamically stable STEMI compared to culprit-only strategy including the most recent COMPLETE trial which showed reduction in death and MI.2-6 However, the previous studies have variable design in evaluating the nonculprit vessel, some utilized FFR guidance, while others used angiography guidance. Whether FFR-guided PCI of nonculprit vessel can improve outcome in patients presenting STEMI remains unknown.

Pages

Recommended Reading

CRAVE: Drinking coffee not linked to atrial arrhythmias
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Vegetable fats tied to lower stroke risk, animal fats to higher risk
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
EHRs have no impact on inpatient heart failure clinical choices or outcomes
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
DREAM-HF: Negative stem cell trial in heart failure may still offer promise
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
ASCEND: Aspirin shows hint of dementia protection in T2D
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Specific blood pressure-lowering drugs prevent onset of new diabetes
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Coffee or tea? Drinking both tied to lower stroke, dementia risk
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
FDA flags cardiac perforation risks during leadless pacemaker implantation
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Firefighters’ blood pressure surges when they are called to action
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Predicting cardiac shock mortality in the ICU
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management