TBD Meeting (5380-18)

LAS VEGAS – While research suggests that vaginal mesh grafts are inappropriate for many prolapse repairs, an obstetrician-gynecologist told colleagues that they’re still a valid tool in the repair procedure known as sacral colpopexy, in which mesh is attached via an abdominal route.

Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, of Cleveland Clinic, spoke about the role of mesh grafts and prolapse repairs at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

As Dr. Ridgeway noted, vaginal mesh grafts are controversial because of concerns about their safety. Although many women had favorable outcomes, an unacceptable proportion have experienced complications.

In 2011, the Food and Drug Administration warned that urogynecologic surgical mesh had been linked to 2,874 reports of injuries, deaths, and malfunctions, mostly in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repairs, over 3 years. The other injuries were in stress urinary incontinence repairs. The report focuses on transvaginal mesh for prolapse and not sacral colpopexy or synthetic midurethral slings, which are considered to have a more favorable risk profile.

The FDA declared that “serious adverse events are NOT rare ... and transvaginally placed mesh in POP repair does NOT conclusively improve clinical outcomes over traditional non-mesh repair.” Subsequently, most companies stopped marketing mesh for transvaginal repair of POP.

Since 2011, research has offered new perspective on the use of mesh in specific POP situations.

“We know that mesh does have some slight improvement in medium-term outcome for subjective and objective symptoms,” Dr. Ridgeway said at the meeting, which was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. “This all comes at a price. There’s more blood loss, and you can actually have prolapse in other compartments and de novo SUI.”

She pointed out that these outcomes were noted in a 2013 Cochrane Review. It found improvements in subjective and objective results after treatment with polypropylene mesh vs. native tissue for anterior compartment POP repairs. But the review found multiple disadvantages for mesh vs. native tissue in operating time, blood loss, and reoperations (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;[4]:CD004014).

In 2016, an updated Cochrane Review declared that “current evidence does not support the use of mesh repair compared with native tissue repair for anterior compartment prolapse owing to increased morbidity.” The review also cautioned that while new light-weight transvaginal meshes are available, they haven’t been fully studied. “Clinicians and women should be cautious when utilizing these products, as their safety and efficacy have not been established,” according to the review (Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2016[11];CD004014).

In a follow-up interview, Dr. Ridgeway said “the data are scarce, so it is hard to have an opinion on this.”

She focused much of her presentation on sacral colpopexy. According to Dr. Ridgeway, sacral colpopexy appears to result in lower rates of mesh complications, compared with transvaginal POP surgery with mesh.

“Compared to native tissue prolapse repair using a vaginal approach, sacral colpopexy does have an increased risk profile but likely is associated with better durability,” she said in the interview. “The long-term outcomes following sacral colpopexy are favorable and the risk profile is acceptably low.”

She prefers the approach for recurrent prolapse and post-hysterectomy prolapse, especially in patients with a shorter vagina. She also offers this procedure for younger patients with significant prolapse and those women who are very active or perform repetitive heavy lifting.

In the interview, she offered these tips about the procedure:

• “Identify pertinent anatomy and set yourself up for success. Restore anatomy, retract the colon if necessary, use angled laparoscopes to optimize visualization, and don’t place the vagina on significant tension.”
• “In cases with unusual anatomy, one must recheck anatomic landmarks because it is critical to avoid the middle sacral artery and left common iliac vein, which is often located close to the midline.”
• “The vagina should be well supported but not on tension. One must communicate with assistants to elevate the vagina but not push it too much. I often demonstrate to the assistant how I like it to be.”
• “In regard to closing the peritoneum over the mesh, I like to make sure this dissection is sufficient at the beginning of the case so this part is not a struggle.”

Dr. Ridgeway discloses consulting for Coloplast and serving as an independent contractor (Legal) for Ethicon.

Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

LAS VEGAS – While research suggests that vaginal mesh grafts are inappropriate for many prolapse repairs, an obstetrician-gynecologist told colleagues that they’re still a valid tool in the repair procedure known as sacral colpopexy, in which mesh is attached via an abdominal route.

Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, of Cleveland Clinic, spoke about the role of mesh grafts and prolapse repairs at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

As Dr. Ridgeway noted, vaginal mesh grafts are controversial because of concerns about their safety. Although many women had favorable outcomes, an unacceptable proportion have experienced complications.

In 2011, the Food and Drug Administration warned that urogynecologic surgical mesh had been linked to 2,874 reports of injuries, deaths, and malfunctions, mostly in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repairs, over 3 years. The other injuries were in stress urinary incontinence repairs. The report focuses on transvaginal mesh for prolapse and not sacral colpopexy or synthetic midurethral slings, which are considered to have a more favorable risk profile.

The FDA declared that “serious adverse events are NOT rare ... and transvaginally placed mesh in POP repair does NOT conclusively improve clinical outcomes over traditional non-mesh repair.” Subsequently, most companies stopped marketing mesh for transvaginal repair of POP.

Since 2011, research has offered new perspective on the use of mesh in specific POP situations.

“We know that mesh does have some slight improvement in medium-term outcome for subjective and objective symptoms,” Dr. Ridgeway said at the meeting, which was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. “This all comes at a price. There’s more blood loss, and you can actually have prolapse in other compartments and de novo SUI.”

She pointed out that these outcomes were noted in a 2013 Cochrane Review. It found improvements in subjective and objective results after treatment with polypropylene mesh vs. native tissue for anterior compartment POP repairs. But the review found multiple disadvantages for mesh vs. native tissue in operating time, blood loss, and reoperations (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;[4]:CD004014).

In 2016, an updated Cochrane Review declared that “current evidence does not support the use of mesh repair compared with native tissue repair for anterior compartment prolapse owing to increased morbidity.” The review also cautioned that while new light-weight transvaginal meshes are available, they haven’t been fully studied. “Clinicians and women should be cautious when utilizing these products, as their safety and efficacy have not been established,” according to the review (Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2016[11];CD004014).

In a follow-up interview, Dr. Ridgeway said “the data are scarce, so it is hard to have an opinion on this.”

She focused much of her presentation on sacral colpopexy. According to Dr. Ridgeway, sacral colpopexy appears to result in lower rates of mesh complications, compared with transvaginal POP surgery with mesh.

“Compared to native tissue prolapse repair using a vaginal approach, sacral colpopexy does have an increased risk profile but likely is associated with better durability,” she said in the interview. “The long-term outcomes following sacral colpopexy are favorable and the risk profile is acceptably low.”

She prefers the approach for recurrent prolapse and post-hysterectomy prolapse, especially in patients with a shorter vagina. She also offers this procedure for younger patients with significant prolapse and those women who are very active or perform repetitive heavy lifting.

In the interview, she offered these tips about the procedure:

• “Identify pertinent anatomy and set yourself up for success. Restore anatomy, retract the colon if necessary, use angled laparoscopes to optimize visualization, and don’t place the vagina on significant tension.”
• “In cases with unusual anatomy, one must recheck anatomic landmarks because it is critical to avoid the middle sacral artery and left common iliac vein, which is often located close to the midline.”
• “The vagina should be well supported but not on tension. One must communicate with assistants to elevate the vagina but not push it too much. I often demonstrate to the assistant how I like it to be.”
• “In regard to closing the peritoneum over the mesh, I like to make sure this dissection is sufficient at the beginning of the case so this part is not a struggle.”

Dr. Ridgeway discloses consulting for Coloplast and serving as an independent contractor (Legal) for Ethicon.

Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

LAS VEGAS – While research suggests that vaginal mesh grafts are inappropriate for many prolapse repairs, an obstetrician-gynecologist told colleagues that they’re still a valid tool in the repair procedure known as sacral colpopexy, in which mesh is attached via an abdominal route.

Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, of Cleveland Clinic, spoke about the role of mesh grafts and prolapse repairs at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

As Dr. Ridgeway noted, vaginal mesh grafts are controversial because of concerns about their safety. Although many women had favorable outcomes, an unacceptable proportion have experienced complications.

In 2011, the Food and Drug Administration warned that urogynecologic surgical mesh had been linked to 2,874 reports of injuries, deaths, and malfunctions, mostly in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repairs, over 3 years. The other injuries were in stress urinary incontinence repairs. The report focuses on transvaginal mesh for prolapse and not sacral colpopexy or synthetic midurethral slings, which are considered to have a more favorable risk profile.

The FDA declared that “serious adverse events are NOT rare ... and transvaginally placed mesh in POP repair does NOT conclusively improve clinical outcomes over traditional non-mesh repair.” Subsequently, most companies stopped marketing mesh for transvaginal repair of POP.

Since 2011, research has offered new perspective on the use of mesh in specific POP situations.

“We know that mesh does have some slight improvement in medium-term outcome for subjective and objective symptoms,” Dr. Ridgeway said at the meeting, which was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. “This all comes at a price. There’s more blood loss, and you can actually have prolapse in other compartments and de novo SUI.”

She pointed out that these outcomes were noted in a 2013 Cochrane Review. It found improvements in subjective and objective results after treatment with polypropylene mesh vs. native tissue for anterior compartment POP repairs. But the review found multiple disadvantages for mesh vs. native tissue in operating time, blood loss, and reoperations (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;[4]:CD004014).

In 2016, an updated Cochrane Review declared that “current evidence does not support the use of mesh repair compared with native tissue repair for anterior compartment prolapse owing to increased morbidity.” The review also cautioned that while new light-weight transvaginal meshes are available, they haven’t been fully studied. “Clinicians and women should be cautious when utilizing these products, as their safety and efficacy have not been established,” according to the review (Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2016[11];CD004014).

In a follow-up interview, Dr. Ridgeway said “the data are scarce, so it is hard to have an opinion on this.”

She focused much of her presentation on sacral colpopexy. According to Dr. Ridgeway, sacral colpopexy appears to result in lower rates of mesh complications, compared with transvaginal POP surgery with mesh.

“Compared to native tissue prolapse repair using a vaginal approach, sacral colpopexy does have an increased risk profile but likely is associated with better durability,” she said in the interview. “The long-term outcomes following sacral colpopexy are favorable and the risk profile is acceptably low.”

She prefers the approach for recurrent prolapse and post-hysterectomy prolapse, especially in patients with a shorter vagina. She also offers this procedure for younger patients with significant prolapse and those women who are very active or perform repetitive heavy lifting.

In the interview, she offered these tips about the procedure:

• “Identify pertinent anatomy and set yourself up for success. Restore anatomy, retract the colon if necessary, use angled laparoscopes to optimize visualization, and don’t place the vagina on significant tension.”
• “In cases with unusual anatomy, one must recheck anatomic landmarks because it is critical to avoid the middle sacral artery and left common iliac vein, which is often located close to the midline.”
• “The vagina should be well supported but not on tension. One must communicate with assistants to elevate the vagina but not push it too much. I often demonstrate to the assistant how I like it to be.”
• “In regard to closing the peritoneum over the mesh, I like to make sure this dissection is sufficient at the beginning of the case so this part is not a struggle.”

Dr. Ridgeway discloses consulting for Coloplast and serving as an independent contractor (Legal) for Ethicon.

Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

LAS VEGAS – A few weeks before she was scheduled to speak at the annual Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, received an anonymous note about her upcoming presentation. “Someone wanted me to think very carefully about what I’d be talking about during my presentation on synthetics,” she recalled.

Thinkstock

The note reflects the deep controversy over the use of transvaginal synthetic mesh products, which have been linked to a long list of serious adverse effects. “There are women who have been harmed, and I take care of a lot of those,” said Dr. Ridgeway, who’s based at Cleveland Clinic. One key distinction is that there is a very different risk profile between transvaginal synthetic mesh prolapse kits and polypropylene midurethral slings. While it’s important to be thoughtful about the use of mesh in synthetic midurethral (MU) slings, she said, they remain well supported as an effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Even so, she said, the news about the risks of mesh “weighs on our patients’ minds” and spawns fear among physicians. Meanwhile, she said, “there is quite a bit of flux” in the marketplace as companies withdraw products because of their perception of risk.

Even amid the controversy, she said, it’s important to remember how crucial it is to treat women in need. “SUI is a very common problem, and women suffer significantly. With our aging population, the prevalence will increase even more,” she said. “It is critical that we screen patients for SUI and have the ability to offer treatment. Having different treatment options benefit women significantly.”

Dr. Ridgeway offered these pearls about the use of synthetic MU slings and alternative approaches to treating SUI.

It’s helpful to find a single strategy and embrace it.

“For ob.gyn. specialists who treat primary, uncomplicated SUI, I recommend surgeons become comfortable with an approach and focus on becoming high-volume surgeons in that approach,” Dr. Ridgeway said. “It is also good to partner with a female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery specialist who can back one up for more complicated cases, complications, or recurrent SUI. These specialists should be able to offer a full array of procedures to treat SUI and tailor the treatment to the individual patient, especially in more complex cases.”

Synthetic MU slings are the “definitive standard of care.”

More than 17 years of research suggest the efficacy of the slings is durable, she said, especially when the goal is to resolve symptoms in patients with pure SUI symptoms. “Nothing in gynecology has been better evaluated than the MU sling,” she said, pointing to more than 500 articles and more than 40 randomized controlled trials.

According to her, synthetic slings have similar efficacy to traditional slings but require less time in the operating room and produce less voiding dysfunction and de novo urgency. “The revision rate of synthetic MU slings is very low,” she added. “In large studies, the revision rate at 10 years is 3%-4%.”

It’s important to keep patient consent in mind, she said. “Patients should know and understand the specific risks of any procedure, including MU slings, so that they can share in decision making.”

Transobdurator (TOT) slings offer benefits.

There’s less risk of bladder and vascular injury from the TOT procedure, which is easy to learn and teach, Dr. Ridgeway said. Research suggests the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) approach is more likely to cause voiding dysfunction, she added.

But TOT is probably less effective in patients with SUI linked to intrinsic sphincter deficiency and in longer-term follow-up, she said. And there are cases of male sex partners injuring their penises during contact with TOT slings during intercourse.

Single-incision slings are up-and-coming options.

These slings offer promising results in short-term studies, but long-term results aren’t available yet. They may be a good option for cases of mild and occult SUI, she said.

Alternative treatments for SUI have limitations.

These include urethral bulking agents, which mainly lead to improvement rather than cure. Autologous fascial pubovaginal slings are another option, especially if patients don’t want a mesh-based treatment or have recurrent SUI following a synthetic mesh complication. However, she noted that research points to morbidity and de novo urinary urgency, she said.

The Pelvic Anatomy & Gynecologic Surgery Symposium was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Dr. Ridgeway disclosed consulting for Coloplast and having served as an independent contractor (legal) for Ethicon.

LAS VEGAS – A few weeks before she was scheduled to speak at the annual Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, received an anonymous note about her upcoming presentation. “Someone wanted me to think very carefully about what I’d be talking about during my presentation on synthetics,” she recalled.

Thinkstock

The note reflects the deep controversy over the use of transvaginal synthetic mesh products, which have been linked to a long list of serious adverse effects. “There are women who have been harmed, and I take care of a lot of those,” said Dr. Ridgeway, who’s based at Cleveland Clinic. One key distinction is that there is a very different risk profile between transvaginal synthetic mesh prolapse kits and polypropylene midurethral slings. While it’s important to be thoughtful about the use of mesh in synthetic midurethral (MU) slings, she said, they remain well supported as an effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Even so, she said, the news about the risks of mesh “weighs on our patients’ minds” and spawns fear among physicians. Meanwhile, she said, “there is quite a bit of flux” in the marketplace as companies withdraw products because of their perception of risk.

Even amid the controversy, she said, it’s important to remember how crucial it is to treat women in need. “SUI is a very common problem, and women suffer significantly. With our aging population, the prevalence will increase even more,” she said. “It is critical that we screen patients for SUI and have the ability to offer treatment. Having different treatment options benefit women significantly.”

Dr. Ridgeway offered these pearls about the use of synthetic MU slings and alternative approaches to treating SUI.

It’s helpful to find a single strategy and embrace it.

“For ob.gyn. specialists who treat primary, uncomplicated SUI, I recommend surgeons become comfortable with an approach and focus on becoming high-volume surgeons in that approach,” Dr. Ridgeway said. “It is also good to partner with a female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery specialist who can back one up for more complicated cases, complications, or recurrent SUI. These specialists should be able to offer a full array of procedures to treat SUI and tailor the treatment to the individual patient, especially in more complex cases.”

Synthetic MU slings are the “definitive standard of care.”

More than 17 years of research suggest the efficacy of the slings is durable, she said, especially when the goal is to resolve symptoms in patients with pure SUI symptoms. “Nothing in gynecology has been better evaluated than the MU sling,” she said, pointing to more than 500 articles and more than 40 randomized controlled trials.

According to her, synthetic slings have similar efficacy to traditional slings but require less time in the operating room and produce less voiding dysfunction and de novo urgency. “The revision rate of synthetic MU slings is very low,” she added. “In large studies, the revision rate at 10 years is 3%-4%.”

It’s important to keep patient consent in mind, she said. “Patients should know and understand the specific risks of any procedure, including MU slings, so that they can share in decision making.”

Transobdurator (TOT) slings offer benefits.

There’s less risk of bladder and vascular injury from the TOT procedure, which is easy to learn and teach, Dr. Ridgeway said. Research suggests the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) approach is more likely to cause voiding dysfunction, she added.

But TOT is probably less effective in patients with SUI linked to intrinsic sphincter deficiency and in longer-term follow-up, she said. And there are cases of male sex partners injuring their penises during contact with TOT slings during intercourse.

Single-incision slings are up-and-coming options.

These slings offer promising results in short-term studies, but long-term results aren’t available yet. They may be a good option for cases of mild and occult SUI, she said.

Alternative treatments for SUI have limitations.

These include urethral bulking agents, which mainly lead to improvement rather than cure. Autologous fascial pubovaginal slings are another option, especially if patients don’t want a mesh-based treatment or have recurrent SUI following a synthetic mesh complication. However, she noted that research points to morbidity and de novo urinary urgency, she said.

The Pelvic Anatomy & Gynecologic Surgery Symposium was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Dr. Ridgeway disclosed consulting for Coloplast and having served as an independent contractor (legal) for Ethicon.

LAS VEGAS – A few weeks before she was scheduled to speak at the annual Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, received an anonymous note about her upcoming presentation. “Someone wanted me to think very carefully about what I’d be talking about during my presentation on synthetics,” she recalled.

Thinkstock

The note reflects the deep controversy over the use of transvaginal synthetic mesh products, which have been linked to a long list of serious adverse effects. “There are women who have been harmed, and I take care of a lot of those,” said Dr. Ridgeway, who’s based at Cleveland Clinic. One key distinction is that there is a very different risk profile between transvaginal synthetic mesh prolapse kits and polypropylene midurethral slings. While it’s important to be thoughtful about the use of mesh in synthetic midurethral (MU) slings, she said, they remain well supported as an effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Even so, she said, the news about the risks of mesh “weighs on our patients’ minds” and spawns fear among physicians. Meanwhile, she said, “there is quite a bit of flux” in the marketplace as companies withdraw products because of their perception of risk.

Even amid the controversy, she said, it’s important to remember how crucial it is to treat women in need. “SUI is a very common problem, and women suffer significantly. With our aging population, the prevalence will increase even more,” she said. “It is critical that we screen patients for SUI and have the ability to offer treatment. Having different treatment options benefit women significantly.”

Dr. Ridgeway offered these pearls about the use of synthetic MU slings and alternative approaches to treating SUI.

It’s helpful to find a single strategy and embrace it.

“For ob.gyn. specialists who treat primary, uncomplicated SUI, I recommend surgeons become comfortable with an approach and focus on becoming high-volume surgeons in that approach,” Dr. Ridgeway said. “It is also good to partner with a female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery specialist who can back one up for more complicated cases, complications, or recurrent SUI. These specialists should be able to offer a full array of procedures to treat SUI and tailor the treatment to the individual patient, especially in more complex cases.”

Synthetic MU slings are the “definitive standard of care.”

More than 17 years of research suggest the efficacy of the slings is durable, she said, especially when the goal is to resolve symptoms in patients with pure SUI symptoms. “Nothing in gynecology has been better evaluated than the MU sling,” she said, pointing to more than 500 articles and more than 40 randomized controlled trials.

According to her, synthetic slings have similar efficacy to traditional slings but require less time in the operating room and produce less voiding dysfunction and de novo urgency. “The revision rate of synthetic MU slings is very low,” she added. “In large studies, the revision rate at 10 years is 3%-4%.”

It’s important to keep patient consent in mind, she said. “Patients should know and understand the specific risks of any procedure, including MU slings, so that they can share in decision making.”

Transobdurator (TOT) slings offer benefits.

There’s less risk of bladder and vascular injury from the TOT procedure, which is easy to learn and teach, Dr. Ridgeway said. Research suggests the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) approach is more likely to cause voiding dysfunction, she added.

But TOT is probably less effective in patients with SUI linked to intrinsic sphincter deficiency and in longer-term follow-up, she said. And there are cases of male sex partners injuring their penises during contact with TOT slings during intercourse.

Single-incision slings are up-and-coming options.

These slings offer promising results in short-term studies, but long-term results aren’t available yet. They may be a good option for cases of mild and occult SUI, she said.

Alternative treatments for SUI have limitations.

These include urethral bulking agents, which mainly lead to improvement rather than cure. Autologous fascial pubovaginal slings are another option, especially if patients don’t want a mesh-based treatment or have recurrent SUI following a synthetic mesh complication. However, she noted that research points to morbidity and de novo urinary urgency, she said.

The Pelvic Anatomy & Gynecologic Surgery Symposium was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Dr. Ridgeway disclosed consulting for Coloplast and having served as an independent contractor (legal) for Ethicon.

LAS VEGAS – Northern California’s Michael S. Baggish, MD, wants more gynecologists to feel comfortable treating disorders of the vulva.

In a presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, Dr. Baggish ran through some tips about diagnosing and treating vulvar conditions. He discussed routine disorders (such as pubic lice), potentially dangerous disorders (such as lichen sclerosis, an inflammatory skin condition that can develop into squamous cell carcinoma), and rare disorders (such as Behçet’s syndrome, an inflammation of the blood vessels that can cause genital sores, and Fox-Fordyce disease of the vulva, which produces intense itching).

Dr. Baggish, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco, who treats patients in the Wine Country town of Saint Helena, elaborated on the treatment of vulvar disease in an interview at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company. The following are a few of his tips for gynecologists who want to expand their expertise and treat more patients with vulvar disorders.

• Get training in pathology. “That has made a big difference in my ability to intercept different kinds of vulvar and skin diseases,” he said. “You also need to see a lot of abnormalities so you can recognize the kinds of changes that you’re seeing.”
• Take a closer look with a microscope. “I have an operating microscope like an ophthalmologist would use, and it’s on a stand, not a table,” he said. “It always provides magnification with good light. This is a big advantage because misdiagnoses can be made when you can’t see the lesion well.” He added that he projects what he sees in the microscope onto a monitor so the patient can take a look herself. “I’ve found that very valuable,” he said.
• Be alert for chemical burns. “I’ve seen chemical burns when patients have had fungal infections and treated it with certain topical treatments like gentian violet. Somebody may also get a chemical burn from putting some kind of deodorant on their vulva,” Dr. Baggish said. “If you have a chemical burn, you’ll want to treat it with a cream to cover the lesion until it heals on its own. Silvadene is soothing, and patients find it very comfortable.”
• Get the right kind of biopsy. If you can’t identify a lesion, he said, “it’s better to do a biopsy.” He recommends asking pathologists for a reticulum stain. “It shows the support structure of the underlying tissue in the dermis of the layers of the skin, like the structure of a building before you put the covering on the girders,” he said. “The support structure is broken up in lichen planus [a common inflammatory condition that affects the skin and mucous membranes and can cause pain and itch]. You see that if you do a reticulum stain.” If a patient has an inflammatory condition, ask for relevant stains, he said. “For example, if there’s a question that this could be a viral disease like herpes simplex, I’m going to ask them to do a stain for viral inclusions,” he said. “Likewise, I will always ask for a stain for fungal particles, for yeast particles. Sometimes I’ll pick up something like an infection I otherwise would have missed.”
• Contact a specialist when needed. If a biopsy doesn’t help you identify a lesion, he said, “seek out an expert in this area who could be helpful.”

A number of gynecologists like Dr. Baggish specialize in vulvar disease, and several medical centers in the United States operate specialized vulvar clinics including Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and Saint Louis University.

Dr. Baggish said he had no disclosures.

LAS VEGAS – Northern California’s Michael S. Baggish, MD, wants more gynecologists to feel comfortable treating disorders of the vulva.

In a presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, Dr. Baggish ran through some tips about diagnosing and treating vulvar conditions. He discussed routine disorders (such as pubic lice), potentially dangerous disorders (such as lichen sclerosis, an inflammatory skin condition that can develop into squamous cell carcinoma), and rare disorders (such as Behçet’s syndrome, an inflammation of the blood vessels that can cause genital sores, and Fox-Fordyce disease of the vulva, which produces intense itching).

Dr. Baggish, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco, who treats patients in the Wine Country town of Saint Helena, elaborated on the treatment of vulvar disease in an interview at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company. The following are a few of his tips for gynecologists who want to expand their expertise and treat more patients with vulvar disorders.

• Get training in pathology. “That has made a big difference in my ability to intercept different kinds of vulvar and skin diseases,” he said. “You also need to see a lot of abnormalities so you can recognize the kinds of changes that you’re seeing.”
• Take a closer look with a microscope. “I have an operating microscope like an ophthalmologist would use, and it’s on a stand, not a table,” he said. “It always provides magnification with good light. This is a big advantage because misdiagnoses can be made when you can’t see the lesion well.” He added that he projects what he sees in the microscope onto a monitor so the patient can take a look herself. “I’ve found that very valuable,” he said.
• Be alert for chemical burns. “I’ve seen chemical burns when patients have had fungal infections and treated it with certain topical treatments like gentian violet. Somebody may also get a chemical burn from putting some kind of deodorant on their vulva,” Dr. Baggish said. “If you have a chemical burn, you’ll want to treat it with a cream to cover the lesion until it heals on its own. Silvadene is soothing, and patients find it very comfortable.”
• Get the right kind of biopsy. If you can’t identify a lesion, he said, “it’s better to do a biopsy.” He recommends asking pathologists for a reticulum stain. “It shows the support structure of the underlying tissue in the dermis of the layers of the skin, like the structure of a building before you put the covering on the girders,” he said. “The support structure is broken up in lichen planus [a common inflammatory condition that affects the skin and mucous membranes and can cause pain and itch]. You see that if you do a reticulum stain.” If a patient has an inflammatory condition, ask for relevant stains, he said. “For example, if there’s a question that this could be a viral disease like herpes simplex, I’m going to ask them to do a stain for viral inclusions,” he said. “Likewise, I will always ask for a stain for fungal particles, for yeast particles. Sometimes I’ll pick up something like an infection I otherwise would have missed.”
• Contact a specialist when needed. If a biopsy doesn’t help you identify a lesion, he said, “seek out an expert in this area who could be helpful.”

A number of gynecologists like Dr. Baggish specialize in vulvar disease, and several medical centers in the United States operate specialized vulvar clinics including Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and Saint Louis University.

Dr. Baggish said he had no disclosures.

LAS VEGAS – Northern California’s Michael S. Baggish, MD, wants more gynecologists to feel comfortable treating disorders of the vulva.

In a presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, Dr. Baggish ran through some tips about diagnosing and treating vulvar conditions. He discussed routine disorders (such as pubic lice), potentially dangerous disorders (such as lichen sclerosis, an inflammatory skin condition that can develop into squamous cell carcinoma), and rare disorders (such as Behçet’s syndrome, an inflammation of the blood vessels that can cause genital sores, and Fox-Fordyce disease of the vulva, which produces intense itching).

Dr. Baggish, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco, who treats patients in the Wine Country town of Saint Helena, elaborated on the treatment of vulvar disease in an interview at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company. The following are a few of his tips for gynecologists who want to expand their expertise and treat more patients with vulvar disorders.

• Get training in pathology. “That has made a big difference in my ability to intercept different kinds of vulvar and skin diseases,” he said. “You also need to see a lot of abnormalities so you can recognize the kinds of changes that you’re seeing.”
• Take a closer look with a microscope. “I have an operating microscope like an ophthalmologist would use, and it’s on a stand, not a table,” he said. “It always provides magnification with good light. This is a big advantage because misdiagnoses can be made when you can’t see the lesion well.” He added that he projects what he sees in the microscope onto a monitor so the patient can take a look herself. “I’ve found that very valuable,” he said.
• Be alert for chemical burns. “I’ve seen chemical burns when patients have had fungal infections and treated it with certain topical treatments like gentian violet. Somebody may also get a chemical burn from putting some kind of deodorant on their vulva,” Dr. Baggish said. “If you have a chemical burn, you’ll want to treat it with a cream to cover the lesion until it heals on its own. Silvadene is soothing, and patients find it very comfortable.”
• Get the right kind of biopsy. If you can’t identify a lesion, he said, “it’s better to do a biopsy.” He recommends asking pathologists for a reticulum stain. “It shows the support structure of the underlying tissue in the dermis of the layers of the skin, like the structure of a building before you put the covering on the girders,” he said. “The support structure is broken up in lichen planus [a common inflammatory condition that affects the skin and mucous membranes and can cause pain and itch]. You see that if you do a reticulum stain.” If a patient has an inflammatory condition, ask for relevant stains, he said. “For example, if there’s a question that this could be a viral disease like herpes simplex, I’m going to ask them to do a stain for viral inclusions,” he said. “Likewise, I will always ask for a stain for fungal particles, for yeast particles. Sometimes I’ll pick up something like an infection I otherwise would have missed.”
• Contact a specialist when needed. If a biopsy doesn’t help you identify a lesion, he said, “seek out an expert in this area who could be helpful.”

A number of gynecologists like Dr. Baggish specialize in vulvar disease, and several medical centers in the United States operate specialized vulvar clinics including Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and Saint Louis University.

Dr. Baggish said he had no disclosures.

LAS VEGAS – Gynecologist Michael S. Baggish, MD, offered tips about diagnosis and treatment of vulvar conditions at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Pubic lice

Treat with malathion 0.5% lotion (Ovide), permethrin 1%-5% (Nix), or lindane 1% (Kwell). Be aware that the U.S. Library of Medicine cautions that lindane can cause serious side effects, and patients should use it only “if there is some reason you cannot use the other medications or if you have tried the other medications and they have not worked.”

Pruritus (itchy skin)

Eliminate possible contact allergens such as soaps, detergents, and undergarments. Swabs with 2% acetic acid solution can assist with general hygiene. It’s important to address secondary infections, and control of diet and stress may be helpful.

Folliculitis (inflammation of hair follicles)

A salt water bath can be helpful. Try 2 cups of “Instant Ocean” – a sea salt product for aquariums – in a shallow bath twice daily.

It can be treated with silver sulfadiazine (Silvadene) cream (three times daily and at bedtime) or clindamycin (Cleocin) cream (three times daily and at bedtime).

Consider a systemic drug after culture results come back if needed.
 

Lichen sclerosus (a skin inflammation also known as white spot disease)

“I see a lot of lichen sclerosus,” Dr. Baggish said. “Every single practice day, I’m seeing two or three [cases].”

Topical treatments include testosterone cream (which has low efficacy) and topical corticosteroid creams and ointments (the standard treatment).

Other treatments provide better and more consistent results: Etretinate (Tegison), a retinoid that is expensive and can produce serious side effects, and injectable dexamethasone (Decadron), which can stop progression.

Be aware that 10% of patients with this condition may develop squamous cell carcinoma. Monitor for any changes in appearance and biopsy if needed.

Behçet’s disease (a blood vessel inflammation disorder also known as silk road disease)

This rare condition can cause mouth and genital ulcers and uveitis (eye inflammation). For treatment, start 40 mg prednisone for 2-3 days, then 20 mg for 2 days, then 10 mg for 4 days, then stop. Start treatment immediately if there are signs of an oral lesion.

Fox-Fordyce disease (an inflammatory response that blocks sweat ducts and causes intense itching)

Treatment includes estrogen (2.5 mg per day) and tretinoin (Retin-A, apply once daily), usually given together. Suggest that patients try the Instant Ocean salt water treatment in the bath once daily (see details above under folliculitis entry).

Genital warts

Vaporize the warts via laser. “If they look like they’re recurring, I put them on interferon for 3 months because otherwise they just keep recurring,” Dr. Baggish said. “You could put topical treatments on them, but they’ll recur.”

Dr. Baggish, of the University of California, San Francisco, had no relevant financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

LAS VEGAS – Gynecologist Michael S. Baggish, MD, offered tips about diagnosis and treatment of vulvar conditions at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Pubic lice

Treat with malathion 0.5% lotion (Ovide), permethrin 1%-5% (Nix), or lindane 1% (Kwell). Be aware that the U.S. Library of Medicine cautions that lindane can cause serious side effects, and patients should use it only “if there is some reason you cannot use the other medications or if you have tried the other medications and they have not worked.”

Pruritus (itchy skin)

Eliminate possible contact allergens such as soaps, detergents, and undergarments. Swabs with 2% acetic acid solution can assist with general hygiene. It’s important to address secondary infections, and control of diet and stress may be helpful.

Folliculitis (inflammation of hair follicles)

A salt water bath can be helpful. Try 2 cups of “Instant Ocean” – a sea salt product for aquariums – in a shallow bath twice daily.

It can be treated with silver sulfadiazine (Silvadene) cream (three times daily and at bedtime) or clindamycin (Cleocin) cream (three times daily and at bedtime).

Consider a systemic drug after culture results come back if needed.
 

Lichen sclerosus (a skin inflammation also known as white spot disease)

“I see a lot of lichen sclerosus,” Dr. Baggish said. “Every single practice day, I’m seeing two or three [cases].”

Topical treatments include testosterone cream (which has low efficacy) and topical corticosteroid creams and ointments (the standard treatment).

Other treatments provide better and more consistent results: Etretinate (Tegison), a retinoid that is expensive and can produce serious side effects, and injectable dexamethasone (Decadron), which can stop progression.

Be aware that 10% of patients with this condition may develop squamous cell carcinoma. Monitor for any changes in appearance and biopsy if needed.

Behçet’s disease (a blood vessel inflammation disorder also known as silk road disease)

This rare condition can cause mouth and genital ulcers and uveitis (eye inflammation). For treatment, start 40 mg prednisone for 2-3 days, then 20 mg for 2 days, then 10 mg for 4 days, then stop. Start treatment immediately if there are signs of an oral lesion.

Fox-Fordyce disease (an inflammatory response that blocks sweat ducts and causes intense itching)

Treatment includes estrogen (2.5 mg per day) and tretinoin (Retin-A, apply once daily), usually given together. Suggest that patients try the Instant Ocean salt water treatment in the bath once daily (see details above under folliculitis entry).

Genital warts

Vaporize the warts via laser. “If they look like they’re recurring, I put them on interferon for 3 months because otherwise they just keep recurring,” Dr. Baggish said. “You could put topical treatments on them, but they’ll recur.”

Dr. Baggish, of the University of California, San Francisco, had no relevant financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

LAS VEGAS – Gynecologist Michael S. Baggish, MD, offered tips about diagnosis and treatment of vulvar conditions at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Pubic lice

Treat with malathion 0.5% lotion (Ovide), permethrin 1%-5% (Nix), or lindane 1% (Kwell). Be aware that the U.S. Library of Medicine cautions that lindane can cause serious side effects, and patients should use it only “if there is some reason you cannot use the other medications or if you have tried the other medications and they have not worked.”

Pruritus (itchy skin)

Eliminate possible contact allergens such as soaps, detergents, and undergarments. Swabs with 2% acetic acid solution can assist with general hygiene. It’s important to address secondary infections, and control of diet and stress may be helpful.

Folliculitis (inflammation of hair follicles)

A salt water bath can be helpful. Try 2 cups of “Instant Ocean” – a sea salt product for aquariums – in a shallow bath twice daily.

It can be treated with silver sulfadiazine (Silvadene) cream (three times daily and at bedtime) or clindamycin (Cleocin) cream (three times daily and at bedtime).

Consider a systemic drug after culture results come back if needed.
 

Lichen sclerosus (a skin inflammation also known as white spot disease)

“I see a lot of lichen sclerosus,” Dr. Baggish said. “Every single practice day, I’m seeing two or three [cases].”

Topical treatments include testosterone cream (which has low efficacy) and topical corticosteroid creams and ointments (the standard treatment).

Other treatments provide better and more consistent results: Etretinate (Tegison), a retinoid that is expensive and can produce serious side effects, and injectable dexamethasone (Decadron), which can stop progression.

Be aware that 10% of patients with this condition may develop squamous cell carcinoma. Monitor for any changes in appearance and biopsy if needed.

Behçet’s disease (a blood vessel inflammation disorder also known as silk road disease)

This rare condition can cause mouth and genital ulcers and uveitis (eye inflammation). For treatment, start 40 mg prednisone for 2-3 days, then 20 mg for 2 days, then 10 mg for 4 days, then stop. Start treatment immediately if there are signs of an oral lesion.

Fox-Fordyce disease (an inflammatory response that blocks sweat ducts and causes intense itching)

Treatment includes estrogen (2.5 mg per day) and tretinoin (Retin-A, apply once daily), usually given together. Suggest that patients try the Instant Ocean salt water treatment in the bath once daily (see details above under folliculitis entry).

Genital warts

Vaporize the warts via laser. “If they look like they’re recurring, I put them on interferon for 3 months because otherwise they just keep recurring,” Dr. Baggish said. “You could put topical treatments on them, but they’ll recur.”

Dr. Baggish, of the University of California, San Francisco, had no relevant financial disclosures. The meeting was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

LAS VEGAS – An estimated 15%-25% of women aged 18-50 years suffer from chronic pelvic pain, a condition that commonly leads to sick days, reduced activity, and higher medication use. Treatments like surgery and opioids may seem feasible, but an obstetrician-gynecologist who studies pain urged colleagues to think twice.

KatarzynaBialasiewicz/Thinkstock

In some cases, pelvic pain patients may suffer from centralized pain syndromes, conditions linked to the central nervous system that may not respond well to those common treatments, said Sawsan As-Sanie, MD, MPH, director of the University of Michigan Endometriosis Center, Ann Arbor.

“If we have laser vision on the pelvis, we may help some patients, but many of us will do harm,” said Dr. As-Sanie, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Endometriosis is frequently linked to pelvic pain. But, she said, the link between the two is fuzzier than has been assumed.

“It would make sense that endometriosis or pelvic adhesions would activate nociceptive pain, and [there are] a lot of data to support that this is, in part, how endometriosis causes pain,” she said. “But I would argue it really isn’t that simple because the relationship between endometriosis and pelvic pain is very complex and not explained entirely by the lesion.” For example, “we know that pain recurs after medical and surgical therapy, often without evidence of recurrent endometriosis.” And, there’s little relationship between pain symptoms and the location or extent of endometriosis.

What’s going on? Dr. As-Sanie suggested central pain syndromes can play a significant role in pelvic pain. These syndromes are 1.5-2 times more common in women than men, and are triggered or exacerbated by stressors.

She also emphasized the wide-ranging effects of these syndromes. “We focus on pain, but it’s clearly not a just a pain disorder,” noting that patients can report fatigue, poor sleep, greater sensitivity to light and sound, and memory difficulties that produce “fibromyalgia fog.”

Research suggests that patients with central pain syndromes experience changes in both brain structure and function, she said. As for pelvic pain specifically, studies have linked it to increased pain sensitivity and altered central nervous system structure and function regardless of whether endometriosis is present.

How should patients with pelvic pain be treated in light of this information? Dr. As-Sanie suggests first trying “gold standard” approaches to treat contributing factors whether they’re gynecologic, urologic, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal or nerve related.

If those strategies don’t work, she said, “consider treating centralized pain” with a blend of approaches: behavioral (such as diet and cognitive-behavior therapy), medical (such as hormone modulation), and interventional (such as physical therapy and surgery).

Also consider pharmacologic therapies, said Dr. As-Sanie, who identified dual reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine [Effexor] and duloxetine [Cymbalta] are a class of antidepressants that block the reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine) and anticonvulsants as drugs with strong evidence as treatments for central pain syndromes.

“Start at low doses and titrate up,” she advised, and “if at any point a given medication doesn’t work, we should try another.”

The Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Dr. As-Sanie discloses she is a consultant for AbbVie and Myovant.

LAS VEGAS – An estimated 15%-25% of women aged 18-50 years suffer from chronic pelvic pain, a condition that commonly leads to sick days, reduced activity, and higher medication use. Treatments like surgery and opioids may seem feasible, but an obstetrician-gynecologist who studies pain urged colleagues to think twice.

KatarzynaBialasiewicz/Thinkstock

In some cases, pelvic pain patients may suffer from centralized pain syndromes, conditions linked to the central nervous system that may not respond well to those common treatments, said Sawsan As-Sanie, MD, MPH, director of the University of Michigan Endometriosis Center, Ann Arbor.

“If we have laser vision on the pelvis, we may help some patients, but many of us will do harm,” said Dr. As-Sanie, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Endometriosis is frequently linked to pelvic pain. But, she said, the link between the two is fuzzier than has been assumed.

“It would make sense that endometriosis or pelvic adhesions would activate nociceptive pain, and [there are] a lot of data to support that this is, in part, how endometriosis causes pain,” she said. “But I would argue it really isn’t that simple because the relationship between endometriosis and pelvic pain is very complex and not explained entirely by the lesion.” For example, “we know that pain recurs after medical and surgical therapy, often without evidence of recurrent endometriosis.” And, there’s little relationship between pain symptoms and the location or extent of endometriosis.

What’s going on? Dr. As-Sanie suggested central pain syndromes can play a significant role in pelvic pain. These syndromes are 1.5-2 times more common in women than men, and are triggered or exacerbated by stressors.

She also emphasized the wide-ranging effects of these syndromes. “We focus on pain, but it’s clearly not a just a pain disorder,” noting that patients can report fatigue, poor sleep, greater sensitivity to light and sound, and memory difficulties that produce “fibromyalgia fog.”

Research suggests that patients with central pain syndromes experience changes in both brain structure and function, she said. As for pelvic pain specifically, studies have linked it to increased pain sensitivity and altered central nervous system structure and function regardless of whether endometriosis is present.

How should patients with pelvic pain be treated in light of this information? Dr. As-Sanie suggests first trying “gold standard” approaches to treat contributing factors whether they’re gynecologic, urologic, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal or nerve related.

If those strategies don’t work, she said, “consider treating centralized pain” with a blend of approaches: behavioral (such as diet and cognitive-behavior therapy), medical (such as hormone modulation), and interventional (such as physical therapy and surgery).

Also consider pharmacologic therapies, said Dr. As-Sanie, who identified dual reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine [Effexor] and duloxetine [Cymbalta] are a class of antidepressants that block the reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine) and anticonvulsants as drugs with strong evidence as treatments for central pain syndromes.

“Start at low doses and titrate up,” she advised, and “if at any point a given medication doesn’t work, we should try another.”

The Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Dr. As-Sanie discloses she is a consultant for AbbVie and Myovant.

LAS VEGAS – An estimated 15%-25% of women aged 18-50 years suffer from chronic pelvic pain, a condition that commonly leads to sick days, reduced activity, and higher medication use. Treatments like surgery and opioids may seem feasible, but an obstetrician-gynecologist who studies pain urged colleagues to think twice.

KatarzynaBialasiewicz/Thinkstock

In some cases, pelvic pain patients may suffer from centralized pain syndromes, conditions linked to the central nervous system that may not respond well to those common treatments, said Sawsan As-Sanie, MD, MPH, director of the University of Michigan Endometriosis Center, Ann Arbor.

“If we have laser vision on the pelvis, we may help some patients, but many of us will do harm,” said Dr. As-Sanie, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Endometriosis is frequently linked to pelvic pain. But, she said, the link between the two is fuzzier than has been assumed.

“It would make sense that endometriosis or pelvic adhesions would activate nociceptive pain, and [there are] a lot of data to support that this is, in part, how endometriosis causes pain,” she said. “But I would argue it really isn’t that simple because the relationship between endometriosis and pelvic pain is very complex and not explained entirely by the lesion.” For example, “we know that pain recurs after medical and surgical therapy, often without evidence of recurrent endometriosis.” And, there’s little relationship between pain symptoms and the location or extent of endometriosis.

What’s going on? Dr. As-Sanie suggested central pain syndromes can play a significant role in pelvic pain. These syndromes are 1.5-2 times more common in women than men, and are triggered or exacerbated by stressors.

She also emphasized the wide-ranging effects of these syndromes. “We focus on pain, but it’s clearly not a just a pain disorder,” noting that patients can report fatigue, poor sleep, greater sensitivity to light and sound, and memory difficulties that produce “fibromyalgia fog.”

Research suggests that patients with central pain syndromes experience changes in both brain structure and function, she said. As for pelvic pain specifically, studies have linked it to increased pain sensitivity and altered central nervous system structure and function regardless of whether endometriosis is present.

How should patients with pelvic pain be treated in light of this information? Dr. As-Sanie suggests first trying “gold standard” approaches to treat contributing factors whether they’re gynecologic, urologic, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal or nerve related.

If those strategies don’t work, she said, “consider treating centralized pain” with a blend of approaches: behavioral (such as diet and cognitive-behavior therapy), medical (such as hormone modulation), and interventional (such as physical therapy and surgery).

Also consider pharmacologic therapies, said Dr. As-Sanie, who identified dual reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine [Effexor] and duloxetine [Cymbalta] are a class of antidepressants that block the reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine) and anticonvulsants as drugs with strong evidence as treatments for central pain syndromes.

“Start at low doses and titrate up,” she advised, and “if at any point a given medication doesn’t work, we should try another.”

The Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Dr. As-Sanie discloses she is a consultant for AbbVie and Myovant.

LAS VEGAS – While vaginal hysterectomies are becoming less common, a gynecologic surgeon urges colleagues to reconsider the value of the procedure.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

While “younger trainees are seeing fewer vaginal procedures being done and have less confidence to do the procedure,” research suggests that the vaginal approach can offer major benefits, compared with the alternatives, Rosanne M. Kho, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, said at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Dr. Kho pointed to several studies suggesting a decline in vaginal hysterectomies as laparoscopic and robot procedures become more common. One study compared hysterectomy surgery approaches during 2007-2010 and found a sharp rise in robotic procedures (0.5% to 10%) and a big decrease in abdominal procedures (from 54% to 40%). The rate of laparoscopic procedures grew (from 24% to 30%), while vaginal procedures dipped slightly (22% to 20%) (JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309[7]:689-98). Another study tracked hysterectomy strategies at Pittsburgh’s Magee-Womens Hospital in almost 14,000 women during 2000-2010. It found that vaginal hysterectomy rates fell from 22% to 17% while laparoscopic rates grew remarkably from 3% to 43%. Open procedures fell dramatically from 75% to 36% (Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.022).

These findings are “telling me that surgeons are steering away from the vaginal approach because the laparoscopic and robotic approach are much more appealing,” Dr. Koh said at the meeting, which was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Specifically, it appears that surgeons think the vaginal hysterectomy is more “challenging” and “cumbersome,” Dr. Kho said, and they lack inadequate training.

Why should vaginal hysterectomy still be considered? Dr. Kho pointed to two pieces of evidence:

• Expert opinion. A 2017 committee opinion from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists examined routes of hysterectomy in benign disease and declared that, despite the decrease in its use, “evidence supports the opinion that [when feasible] vaginal hysterectomy is associated with better outcomes” than are laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy. Also, the decision to perform a salpingo-oophorectomy is not necessarily a contraindication to performing a vaginal hysterectomy, according to the committee opinion (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129[6]:e155-e9).The opinion also says, “the vaginal approach is preferred among the minimally invasive approaches. Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a preferable alternative to open abdominal hysterectomy for those patients in whom a vaginal hysterectomy is not indicated or feasible. Although minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy are the preferred route, open abdominal hysterectomy remains an important surgical option for some patients.”
• Randomized, controlled studies. A 2015 Cochrane Library systematic review examined 47 randomized, controlled trials and found that “vaginal hysterectomy should be performed whenever possible. Where vaginal hysterectomy is not possible, both a laparoscopic approach and abdominal hysterectomy have their pros and cons, and these should be incorporated in the decision-making process” (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5).

What if a patient has an enlarged uterus? Dr. Kho coauthored a 2017 review that suggested that vaginal hysterectomy may be appropriate in this case. Her report found that in women with large uteri, “vaginal hysterectomy is preferred over laparoscopic and laparoscopic assistance with less operative time and hospital cost. In morbidly obese patients with large uteri, total laparoscopic hysterectomy is superior to vaginal hysterectomy with lesser odds of blood transfusion and lower length of hospital stay” (Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;60[2]:286-95).

What about the removal of fallopian tubes – salpingectomy – during vaginal hysterectomy? Dr. Kho highlighted a 2017 decision analysis that said these procedures are frequently performed for cancer prevention during laparoscopic and open hysterectomies “but [fallopian tubes] are not routinely removed during vaginal hysterectomy because of perceptions of increased morbidity, difficulty, or inadequate surgical training.”

The analysis, however, determined that “salpingectomy should routinely be performed with vaginal hysterectomy because it was the dominant and therefore cost-effective strategy. Complications are minimally increased, but the trade-off with cancer prevention is highly favorable.” (Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217[5]:603.e1-603.e6).

Dr. Kho reported consulting for AbbVie, Olympus, and Applied Medical.

LAS VEGAS – While vaginal hysterectomies are becoming less common, a gynecologic surgeon urges colleagues to reconsider the value of the procedure.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

While “younger trainees are seeing fewer vaginal procedures being done and have less confidence to do the procedure,” research suggests that the vaginal approach can offer major benefits, compared with the alternatives, Rosanne M. Kho, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, said at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Dr. Kho pointed to several studies suggesting a decline in vaginal hysterectomies as laparoscopic and robot procedures become more common. One study compared hysterectomy surgery approaches during 2007-2010 and found a sharp rise in robotic procedures (0.5% to 10%) and a big decrease in abdominal procedures (from 54% to 40%). The rate of laparoscopic procedures grew (from 24% to 30%), while vaginal procedures dipped slightly (22% to 20%) (JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309[7]:689-98). Another study tracked hysterectomy strategies at Pittsburgh’s Magee-Womens Hospital in almost 14,000 women during 2000-2010. It found that vaginal hysterectomy rates fell from 22% to 17% while laparoscopic rates grew remarkably from 3% to 43%. Open procedures fell dramatically from 75% to 36% (Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.022).

These findings are “telling me that surgeons are steering away from the vaginal approach because the laparoscopic and robotic approach are much more appealing,” Dr. Koh said at the meeting, which was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Specifically, it appears that surgeons think the vaginal hysterectomy is more “challenging” and “cumbersome,” Dr. Kho said, and they lack inadequate training.

Why should vaginal hysterectomy still be considered? Dr. Kho pointed to two pieces of evidence:

• Expert opinion. A 2017 committee opinion from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists examined routes of hysterectomy in benign disease and declared that, despite the decrease in its use, “evidence supports the opinion that [when feasible] vaginal hysterectomy is associated with better outcomes” than are laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy. Also, the decision to perform a salpingo-oophorectomy is not necessarily a contraindication to performing a vaginal hysterectomy, according to the committee opinion (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129[6]:e155-e9).The opinion also says, “the vaginal approach is preferred among the minimally invasive approaches. Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a preferable alternative to open abdominal hysterectomy for those patients in whom a vaginal hysterectomy is not indicated or feasible. Although minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy are the preferred route, open abdominal hysterectomy remains an important surgical option for some patients.”
• Randomized, controlled studies. A 2015 Cochrane Library systematic review examined 47 randomized, controlled trials and found that “vaginal hysterectomy should be performed whenever possible. Where vaginal hysterectomy is not possible, both a laparoscopic approach and abdominal hysterectomy have their pros and cons, and these should be incorporated in the decision-making process” (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5).

What if a patient has an enlarged uterus? Dr. Kho coauthored a 2017 review that suggested that vaginal hysterectomy may be appropriate in this case. Her report found that in women with large uteri, “vaginal hysterectomy is preferred over laparoscopic and laparoscopic assistance with less operative time and hospital cost. In morbidly obese patients with large uteri, total laparoscopic hysterectomy is superior to vaginal hysterectomy with lesser odds of blood transfusion and lower length of hospital stay” (Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;60[2]:286-95).

What about the removal of fallopian tubes – salpingectomy – during vaginal hysterectomy? Dr. Kho highlighted a 2017 decision analysis that said these procedures are frequently performed for cancer prevention during laparoscopic and open hysterectomies “but [fallopian tubes] are not routinely removed during vaginal hysterectomy because of perceptions of increased morbidity, difficulty, or inadequate surgical training.”

The analysis, however, determined that “salpingectomy should routinely be performed with vaginal hysterectomy because it was the dominant and therefore cost-effective strategy. Complications are minimally increased, but the trade-off with cancer prevention is highly favorable.” (Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217[5]:603.e1-603.e6).

Dr. Kho reported consulting for AbbVie, Olympus, and Applied Medical.

LAS VEGAS – While vaginal hysterectomies are becoming less common, a gynecologic surgeon urges colleagues to reconsider the value of the procedure.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

While “younger trainees are seeing fewer vaginal procedures being done and have less confidence to do the procedure,” research suggests that the vaginal approach can offer major benefits, compared with the alternatives, Rosanne M. Kho, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, said at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

Dr. Kho pointed to several studies suggesting a decline in vaginal hysterectomies as laparoscopic and robot procedures become more common. One study compared hysterectomy surgery approaches during 2007-2010 and found a sharp rise in robotic procedures (0.5% to 10%) and a big decrease in abdominal procedures (from 54% to 40%). The rate of laparoscopic procedures grew (from 24% to 30%), while vaginal procedures dipped slightly (22% to 20%) (JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309[7]:689-98). Another study tracked hysterectomy strategies at Pittsburgh’s Magee-Womens Hospital in almost 14,000 women during 2000-2010. It found that vaginal hysterectomy rates fell from 22% to 17% while laparoscopic rates grew remarkably from 3% to 43%. Open procedures fell dramatically from 75% to 36% (Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.022).

These findings are “telling me that surgeons are steering away from the vaginal approach because the laparoscopic and robotic approach are much more appealing,” Dr. Koh said at the meeting, which was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Specifically, it appears that surgeons think the vaginal hysterectomy is more “challenging” and “cumbersome,” Dr. Kho said, and they lack inadequate training.

Why should vaginal hysterectomy still be considered? Dr. Kho pointed to two pieces of evidence:

• Expert opinion. A 2017 committee opinion from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists examined routes of hysterectomy in benign disease and declared that, despite the decrease in its use, “evidence supports the opinion that [when feasible] vaginal hysterectomy is associated with better outcomes” than are laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy. Also, the decision to perform a salpingo-oophorectomy is not necessarily a contraindication to performing a vaginal hysterectomy, according to the committee opinion (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129[6]:e155-e9).The opinion also says, “the vaginal approach is preferred among the minimally invasive approaches. Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a preferable alternative to open abdominal hysterectomy for those patients in whom a vaginal hysterectomy is not indicated or feasible. Although minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy are the preferred route, open abdominal hysterectomy remains an important surgical option for some patients.”
• Randomized, controlled studies. A 2015 Cochrane Library systematic review examined 47 randomized, controlled trials and found that “vaginal hysterectomy should be performed whenever possible. Where vaginal hysterectomy is not possible, both a laparoscopic approach and abdominal hysterectomy have their pros and cons, and these should be incorporated in the decision-making process” (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5).

What if a patient has an enlarged uterus? Dr. Kho coauthored a 2017 review that suggested that vaginal hysterectomy may be appropriate in this case. Her report found that in women with large uteri, “vaginal hysterectomy is preferred over laparoscopic and laparoscopic assistance with less operative time and hospital cost. In morbidly obese patients with large uteri, total laparoscopic hysterectomy is superior to vaginal hysterectomy with lesser odds of blood transfusion and lower length of hospital stay” (Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;60[2]:286-95).

What about the removal of fallopian tubes – salpingectomy – during vaginal hysterectomy? Dr. Kho highlighted a 2017 decision analysis that said these procedures are frequently performed for cancer prevention during laparoscopic and open hysterectomies “but [fallopian tubes] are not routinely removed during vaginal hysterectomy because of perceptions of increased morbidity, difficulty, or inadequate surgical training.”

The analysis, however, determined that “salpingectomy should routinely be performed with vaginal hysterectomy because it was the dominant and therefore cost-effective strategy. Complications are minimally increased, but the trade-off with cancer prevention is highly favorable.” (Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217[5]:603.e1-603.e6).

Dr. Kho reported consulting for AbbVie, Olympus, and Applied Medical.

LAS VEGAS – Officially a type of precancerous lesion is known as vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN); unofficially, an obstetrician-gynecologist calls it something else: “The Great Mimicker.” That’s because symptoms of VIN can fool physicians into thinking they’re seeing other vulvar conditions. The good news: A biopsy can offer crucial insight and should be performed on any dysplastic or unusual lesion on the vulva.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, of Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, offered this advice and other tips about this type of precancerous vulvar lesion in a presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

According to Dr. Nickles Fader, vulvar cancer accounts for 5% of all gynecologic malignancies, and it appears most in women aged 65-75 years. However, about 15% of all vulvar cancers appear in women under the age of 40 years. “We’re seeing a greater number of premenopausal women with this condition, probably due to HPV [human papillomavirus],” she said, adding that HPV vaccines are crucial to prevention.

The VIN form of precancerous lesion is most common in premenopausal women (75%) and – like vulvar cancer – is linked to HPV infection, HIV infection, cigarette smoking, and weakened or suppressed immune systems, Dr. Nickles Faber said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

VIN presents with symptoms such as pruritus, altered vulvar appearance at the site of the lesion, palpable abnormality, and perineal pain or burning. About 40% of cases do not show symptoms and are diagnosed by gynecologists at annual visits.

It’s important to biopsy these lesions, she said, because they can mimic other conditions such as vulvar cancer, condyloma acuminatum (genital warts), lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, and condyloma latum (a lesion linked to syphilis).

“Biopsy, biopsy, biopsy,” she urged.

In fact, one form of VIN – differentiated VIN – is associated with dermatologic conditions such as lichen sclerosus, and treatment of these conditions can prevent development of this VIN type.

As for treatment, Dr. Nickles Faber said surgery is the mainstay. About 90% of the time, wide local excision is the “go-to” approach, although the skinning vulvectomy procedure may be appropriate in lesions that are more extensive or multifocal and confluent. “It’s a lot more disfiguring.”

Laser ablation is a “very reasonable” option when cancer has been eliminated as a possibility, she said. It may be appropriate in multifocal or extensive lesions and can have important cosmetic advantages when excision would be inappropriate.

Off-label use of imiquimod 5%, a topical immune response modifier, can be appropriate in multifocal high-grade VINs, but it’s crucial to exclude invasive squamous cell carcinoma. As she noted, imiquimod is Food and Drug Administration–approved for anogenital warts but not for VIN. Beware of toxicity over the long term.

Dr. Nickles Fader reported no relevant financial disclosures.

LAS VEGAS – Officially a type of precancerous lesion is known as vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN); unofficially, an obstetrician-gynecologist calls it something else: “The Great Mimicker.” That’s because symptoms of VIN can fool physicians into thinking they’re seeing other vulvar conditions. The good news: A biopsy can offer crucial insight and should be performed on any dysplastic or unusual lesion on the vulva.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, of Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, offered this advice and other tips about this type of precancerous vulvar lesion in a presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

According to Dr. Nickles Fader, vulvar cancer accounts for 5% of all gynecologic malignancies, and it appears most in women aged 65-75 years. However, about 15% of all vulvar cancers appear in women under the age of 40 years. “We’re seeing a greater number of premenopausal women with this condition, probably due to HPV [human papillomavirus],” she said, adding that HPV vaccines are crucial to prevention.

The VIN form of precancerous lesion is most common in premenopausal women (75%) and – like vulvar cancer – is linked to HPV infection, HIV infection, cigarette smoking, and weakened or suppressed immune systems, Dr. Nickles Faber said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

VIN presents with symptoms such as pruritus, altered vulvar appearance at the site of the lesion, palpable abnormality, and perineal pain or burning. About 40% of cases do not show symptoms and are diagnosed by gynecologists at annual visits.

It’s important to biopsy these lesions, she said, because they can mimic other conditions such as vulvar cancer, condyloma acuminatum (genital warts), lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, and condyloma latum (a lesion linked to syphilis).

“Biopsy, biopsy, biopsy,” she urged.

In fact, one form of VIN – differentiated VIN – is associated with dermatologic conditions such as lichen sclerosus, and treatment of these conditions can prevent development of this VIN type.

As for treatment, Dr. Nickles Faber said surgery is the mainstay. About 90% of the time, wide local excision is the “go-to” approach, although the skinning vulvectomy procedure may be appropriate in lesions that are more extensive or multifocal and confluent. “It’s a lot more disfiguring.”

Laser ablation is a “very reasonable” option when cancer has been eliminated as a possibility, she said. It may be appropriate in multifocal or extensive lesions and can have important cosmetic advantages when excision would be inappropriate.

Off-label use of imiquimod 5%, a topical immune response modifier, can be appropriate in multifocal high-grade VINs, but it’s crucial to exclude invasive squamous cell carcinoma. As she noted, imiquimod is Food and Drug Administration–approved for anogenital warts but not for VIN. Beware of toxicity over the long term.

Dr. Nickles Fader reported no relevant financial disclosures.

LAS VEGAS – Officially a type of precancerous lesion is known as vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN); unofficially, an obstetrician-gynecologist calls it something else: “The Great Mimicker.” That’s because symptoms of VIN can fool physicians into thinking they’re seeing other vulvar conditions. The good news: A biopsy can offer crucial insight and should be performed on any dysplastic or unusual lesion on the vulva.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, of Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, offered this advice and other tips about this type of precancerous vulvar lesion in a presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.

According to Dr. Nickles Fader, vulvar cancer accounts for 5% of all gynecologic malignancies, and it appears most in women aged 65-75 years. However, about 15% of all vulvar cancers appear in women under the age of 40 years. “We’re seeing a greater number of premenopausal women with this condition, probably due to HPV [human papillomavirus],” she said, adding that HPV vaccines are crucial to prevention.

The VIN form of precancerous lesion is most common in premenopausal women (75%) and – like vulvar cancer – is linked to HPV infection, HIV infection, cigarette smoking, and weakened or suppressed immune systems, Dr. Nickles Faber said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

VIN presents with symptoms such as pruritus, altered vulvar appearance at the site of the lesion, palpable abnormality, and perineal pain or burning. About 40% of cases do not show symptoms and are diagnosed by gynecologists at annual visits.

It’s important to biopsy these lesions, she said, because they can mimic other conditions such as vulvar cancer, condyloma acuminatum (genital warts), lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, and condyloma latum (a lesion linked to syphilis).

“Biopsy, biopsy, biopsy,” she urged.

In fact, one form of VIN – differentiated VIN – is associated with dermatologic conditions such as lichen sclerosus, and treatment of these conditions can prevent development of this VIN type.

As for treatment, Dr. Nickles Faber said surgery is the mainstay. About 90% of the time, wide local excision is the “go-to” approach, although the skinning vulvectomy procedure may be appropriate in lesions that are more extensive or multifocal and confluent. “It’s a lot more disfiguring.”

Laser ablation is a “very reasonable” option when cancer has been eliminated as a possibility, she said. It may be appropriate in multifocal or extensive lesions and can have important cosmetic advantages when excision would be inappropriate.

Off-label use of imiquimod 5%, a topical immune response modifier, can be appropriate in multifocal high-grade VINs, but it’s crucial to exclude invasive squamous cell carcinoma. As she noted, imiquimod is Food and Drug Administration–approved for anogenital warts but not for VIN. Beware of toxicity over the long term.

Dr. Nickles Fader reported no relevant financial disclosures.

LAS VEGAS – An ob.gyn. has some handy hysterectomy-related pain management tips for her colleagues: Don’t assume patients know how to titrate between NSAIDs and opioids after surgery. Consider neuropathic medications alone in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomies. And take a lesson from French fry portions at fast-food restaurants: Don’t “super-size” opioid prescriptions.

Sawsan As-Sanie, MD, MPH, director of the University of Michigan Endometriosis Center, Ann Arbor, offered these and other recommendations about hysterectomy-related pain at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.
 

Try acetaminophen and an NSAID

In the preoperative period, a combination of acetaminophen (Tylenol) and an NSAID can provide significant postop relief, Dr. As-Sanie said.

She highlighted a 2010 systematic review of 21 studies that included 1,909 patients and found acetaminophen/NSAID combinations improved pain intensity by about 35% in positive studies when compared with either acetaminophen or NSAID alone. The painkiller combination was positive – more effective than a solo agent – in 85% of studies of combo versus acetaminophen alone and 64% of studies of combo versus NSAID alone (Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110[4]:1170-9).

Another study, she said, found that there’s no clear advantage to IV administration for acetaminophen if patients can take the drug orally (Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;68[3]:238-47).
 

Consider gabapentin, but not postoperatively

Dr. As-Sanie pointed to a 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis that suggested the use of preoperative gabapentin in abdominal hysterectomy reduces pain and opioid use. However, adding postoperative doses of gabapentin, she said, don’t appear to produce a greater effect (Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123[6]:1221-9).

Consider neuropathics for minimally invasive hysterectomy

Two studies, one in 2004 and the other in 2008, suggest that gabapentin (on a postop basis) and pregabalin (perioperatively) can reduce postop opioid use. (Pregabalin also was linked to more adverse effects.) “Even if they’re having a little bit of pain, they’re using fewer opioids,” she said (Pain. 2004 Jul;110[1-2]:175-81; Pain. 2008 Jan;134[1-2]:106-12).
 

Educate patients about postop painkiller use

Don’t assume that patients know how to adjust their over-the-counter painkiller use after surgery, Dr. As-Sanie said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company. “While we as physicians think that knowledge about the use of ibuprofen and Tylenol is something everyone should be born with, it’s not obvious to most patients and families.”

It’s important to teach patients to start with NSAIDs or Tylenol postoperatively, and if that doesn’t control pain, “you add opioids and use medications to control constipation as needed. As you recover, you reduce the amount of opioids first and then reduce the NSAIDs or Tylenol,” she said. “That education can be very helpful for the vast majority of patients, and it’s one of the most important things we can provide.”
 

Don’t over-prescribe opioids

For a 2017 study, Dr. As-Sanie and colleagues tracked hysterectomy patients and surveyed them about their postop opioid use. “When asked 2 weeks after surgery, most used far less than half of what they prescribed,” Dr. As-Sanie said. “If we gave them about 40 pills, they had between 13-15 pills left after the surgery on average. Nearly 50% didn’t use any of their medication” (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130[6]:1261-8).

Dr. As-Sanie urged colleagues to remember the lesson of the rise of super-sized portions at fast-food restaurants: Give people more of something and they’ll eat (or use) more of it. And the reverse is true: “If you give people fewer pills, they will use fewer pills.”

Dr. As-Sanie highlighted the recommendations about opioid prescription levels for various surgical procedures, including different types of hysterectomies, at www.opioidprescribing.info. The recommendations are provided by the Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network. They’re designed for opioid-naive patients and suggest the lowest doses for vaginal hysterectomy and the highest for abdominal hysterectomy, with recommended doses for laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in between.

Dr. As-Sanie disclosed she is a consultant for AbbVie and Myovant.

LAS VEGAS – An ob.gyn. has some handy hysterectomy-related pain management tips for her colleagues: Don’t assume patients know how to titrate between NSAIDs and opioids after surgery. Consider neuropathic medications alone in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomies. And take a lesson from French fry portions at fast-food restaurants: Don’t “super-size” opioid prescriptions.

Sawsan As-Sanie, MD, MPH, director of the University of Michigan Endometriosis Center, Ann Arbor, offered these and other recommendations about hysterectomy-related pain at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.
 

Try acetaminophen and an NSAID

In the preoperative period, a combination of acetaminophen (Tylenol) and an NSAID can provide significant postop relief, Dr. As-Sanie said.

She highlighted a 2010 systematic review of 21 studies that included 1,909 patients and found acetaminophen/NSAID combinations improved pain intensity by about 35% in positive studies when compared with either acetaminophen or NSAID alone. The painkiller combination was positive – more effective than a solo agent – in 85% of studies of combo versus acetaminophen alone and 64% of studies of combo versus NSAID alone (Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110[4]:1170-9).

Another study, she said, found that there’s no clear advantage to IV administration for acetaminophen if patients can take the drug orally (Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;68[3]:238-47).
 

Consider gabapentin, but not postoperatively

Dr. As-Sanie pointed to a 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis that suggested the use of preoperative gabapentin in abdominal hysterectomy reduces pain and opioid use. However, adding postoperative doses of gabapentin, she said, don’t appear to produce a greater effect (Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123[6]:1221-9).

Consider neuropathics for minimally invasive hysterectomy

Two studies, one in 2004 and the other in 2008, suggest that gabapentin (on a postop basis) and pregabalin (perioperatively) can reduce postop opioid use. (Pregabalin also was linked to more adverse effects.) “Even if they’re having a little bit of pain, they’re using fewer opioids,” she said (Pain. 2004 Jul;110[1-2]:175-81; Pain. 2008 Jan;134[1-2]:106-12).
 

Educate patients about postop painkiller use

Don’t assume that patients know how to adjust their over-the-counter painkiller use after surgery, Dr. As-Sanie said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company. “While we as physicians think that knowledge about the use of ibuprofen and Tylenol is something everyone should be born with, it’s not obvious to most patients and families.”

It’s important to teach patients to start with NSAIDs or Tylenol postoperatively, and if that doesn’t control pain, “you add opioids and use medications to control constipation as needed. As you recover, you reduce the amount of opioids first and then reduce the NSAIDs or Tylenol,” she said. “That education can be very helpful for the vast majority of patients, and it’s one of the most important things we can provide.”
 

Don’t over-prescribe opioids

For a 2017 study, Dr. As-Sanie and colleagues tracked hysterectomy patients and surveyed them about their postop opioid use. “When asked 2 weeks after surgery, most used far less than half of what they prescribed,” Dr. As-Sanie said. “If we gave them about 40 pills, they had between 13-15 pills left after the surgery on average. Nearly 50% didn’t use any of their medication” (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130[6]:1261-8).

Dr. As-Sanie urged colleagues to remember the lesson of the rise of super-sized portions at fast-food restaurants: Give people more of something and they’ll eat (or use) more of it. And the reverse is true: “If you give people fewer pills, they will use fewer pills.”

Dr. As-Sanie highlighted the recommendations about opioid prescription levels for various surgical procedures, including different types of hysterectomies, at www.opioidprescribing.info. The recommendations are provided by the Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network. They’re designed for opioid-naive patients and suggest the lowest doses for vaginal hysterectomy and the highest for abdominal hysterectomy, with recommended doses for laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in between.

Dr. As-Sanie disclosed she is a consultant for AbbVie and Myovant.

LAS VEGAS – An ob.gyn. has some handy hysterectomy-related pain management tips for her colleagues: Don’t assume patients know how to titrate between NSAIDs and opioids after surgery. Consider neuropathic medications alone in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomies. And take a lesson from French fry portions at fast-food restaurants: Don’t “super-size” opioid prescriptions.

Sawsan As-Sanie, MD, MPH, director of the University of Michigan Endometriosis Center, Ann Arbor, offered these and other recommendations about hysterectomy-related pain at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.
 

Try acetaminophen and an NSAID

In the preoperative period, a combination of acetaminophen (Tylenol) and an NSAID can provide significant postop relief, Dr. As-Sanie said.

She highlighted a 2010 systematic review of 21 studies that included 1,909 patients and found acetaminophen/NSAID combinations improved pain intensity by about 35% in positive studies when compared with either acetaminophen or NSAID alone. The painkiller combination was positive – more effective than a solo agent – in 85% of studies of combo versus acetaminophen alone and 64% of studies of combo versus NSAID alone (Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110[4]:1170-9).

Another study, she said, found that there’s no clear advantage to IV administration for acetaminophen if patients can take the drug orally (Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;68[3]:238-47).
 

Consider gabapentin, but not postoperatively

Dr. As-Sanie pointed to a 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis that suggested the use of preoperative gabapentin in abdominal hysterectomy reduces pain and opioid use. However, adding postoperative doses of gabapentin, she said, don’t appear to produce a greater effect (Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123[6]:1221-9).

Consider neuropathics for minimally invasive hysterectomy

Two studies, one in 2004 and the other in 2008, suggest that gabapentin (on a postop basis) and pregabalin (perioperatively) can reduce postop opioid use. (Pregabalin also was linked to more adverse effects.) “Even if they’re having a little bit of pain, they’re using fewer opioids,” she said (Pain. 2004 Jul;110[1-2]:175-81; Pain. 2008 Jan;134[1-2]:106-12).
 

Educate patients about postop painkiller use

Don’t assume that patients know how to adjust their over-the-counter painkiller use after surgery, Dr. As-Sanie said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company. “While we as physicians think that knowledge about the use of ibuprofen and Tylenol is something everyone should be born with, it’s not obvious to most patients and families.”

It’s important to teach patients to start with NSAIDs or Tylenol postoperatively, and if that doesn’t control pain, “you add opioids and use medications to control constipation as needed. As you recover, you reduce the amount of opioids first and then reduce the NSAIDs or Tylenol,” she said. “That education can be very helpful for the vast majority of patients, and it’s one of the most important things we can provide.”
 

Don’t over-prescribe opioids

For a 2017 study, Dr. As-Sanie and colleagues tracked hysterectomy patients and surveyed them about their postop opioid use. “When asked 2 weeks after surgery, most used far less than half of what they prescribed,” Dr. As-Sanie said. “If we gave them about 40 pills, they had between 13-15 pills left after the surgery on average. Nearly 50% didn’t use any of their medication” (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130[6]:1261-8).

Dr. As-Sanie urged colleagues to remember the lesson of the rise of super-sized portions at fast-food restaurants: Give people more of something and they’ll eat (or use) more of it. And the reverse is true: “If you give people fewer pills, they will use fewer pills.”

Dr. As-Sanie highlighted the recommendations about opioid prescription levels for various surgical procedures, including different types of hysterectomies, at www.opioidprescribing.info. The recommendations are provided by the Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network. They’re designed for opioid-naive patients and suggest the lowest doses for vaginal hysterectomy and the highest for abdominal hysterectomy, with recommended doses for laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in between.

Dr. As-Sanie disclosed she is a consultant for AbbVie and Myovant.

LAS VEGAS – A pelvic surgeon brought a bold message to a gathering of gynecologists: There’s a great gap in American care for pelvic floor disorders such as urinary incontinence, and they’re the right physicians to make a difference by treating these common conditions.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

“There are never going to be enough specialists to deal with these problems. This is a natural progression for many of you,” said urogynecologist and pelvic surgeon Mickey M. Karram, MD, in a joint presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium. In fact, he said, “there’s so much disease out there to fix that you may become more overwhelmed.”

Dr. Karram, who has offices in Cincinnati, Beverly Hills, and Orange County, Calif., spoke about female urinary incontinence with obstetrician-gynecologist Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, of Cleveland Clinic. They offered these tips:

Test for stress incontinence

Dr. Karram recommends using a “quick and easy” cystometrogram (CMG) test to “corroborate or refute what the patient thinks is going on” in regard to urinary function. “With this simple test, you’ll get a clear understanding of sensation [to urinate] and of what their fullness and capacity numbers are,” he said. And if you have the patient cough or strain during the test, “you should be able to duplicate a sign of stress incontinence 90% of the time.”

If patients don’t leak when they take this test, there may be another problem such as overactive bladder, a condition that can’t be duplicated via the test, he said.
 

Ask the right questions

When it comes to identifying when they have urinary difficulties, some patients “say yes to every question we ask,” said Dr. Ridgeway, and they may not be able to distinguish between urgency and leakage.

A better approach is to ask women to provide specific examples of when they have continence issues, she said. It’s also useful to ask patients about what bothers them the most if they have multiple symptoms: Is it urgency (“Gotta go; gotta go”)? Leakage during certain situations like coughing and laughing? “That helps me decide how to go about treating them first and foremost,” she said. “It doesn’t mean you won’t treat both [problems], but it really gives you a reference point of where to start.”

Research suggests that women tend to be more bothered by urge incontinence than stress incontinence, she said, because they can regulate their activities or avoid the stress form.
 

Beware of acute incontinence cases

“If a woman walks in and says ‘Everything was great until a week or two ago, but now I’m living in pads,’ it could be a fecal impaction or a pelvic mass,” Dr. Karram said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Discuss the many treatment options

In some cases of incontinence, Dr. Ridgeway said she’ll mention “the array of treatment options, such as pelvic floor physical therapy, bladder retraining, vaginal estrogen, medications, and Botox.”

She added: “I explain that we’ll work together, and sometimes it will take a couple tries, or we’ll try a couple things at once.”

Dr. Ridgeway disclosed consulting for Coloplast and serving as an independent contractor (legal) for Ethicon. Dr. Karram disclosed speaking for Allergan, Astellas Pharma, Coloplast, and Cynosure/Hologic; consulting for Coloplast and Cynosure/Hologic; and receiving royalties from BihlerMed.

LAS VEGAS – A pelvic surgeon brought a bold message to a gathering of gynecologists: There’s a great gap in American care for pelvic floor disorders such as urinary incontinence, and they’re the right physicians to make a difference by treating these common conditions.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

“There are never going to be enough specialists to deal with these problems. This is a natural progression for many of you,” said urogynecologist and pelvic surgeon Mickey M. Karram, MD, in a joint presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium. In fact, he said, “there’s so much disease out there to fix that you may become more overwhelmed.”

Dr. Karram, who has offices in Cincinnati, Beverly Hills, and Orange County, Calif., spoke about female urinary incontinence with obstetrician-gynecologist Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, of Cleveland Clinic. They offered these tips:

Test for stress incontinence

Dr. Karram recommends using a “quick and easy” cystometrogram (CMG) test to “corroborate or refute what the patient thinks is going on” in regard to urinary function. “With this simple test, you’ll get a clear understanding of sensation [to urinate] and of what their fullness and capacity numbers are,” he said. And if you have the patient cough or strain during the test, “you should be able to duplicate a sign of stress incontinence 90% of the time.”

If patients don’t leak when they take this test, there may be another problem such as overactive bladder, a condition that can’t be duplicated via the test, he said.
 

Ask the right questions

When it comes to identifying when they have urinary difficulties, some patients “say yes to every question we ask,” said Dr. Ridgeway, and they may not be able to distinguish between urgency and leakage.

A better approach is to ask women to provide specific examples of when they have continence issues, she said. It’s also useful to ask patients about what bothers them the most if they have multiple symptoms: Is it urgency (“Gotta go; gotta go”)? Leakage during certain situations like coughing and laughing? “That helps me decide how to go about treating them first and foremost,” she said. “It doesn’t mean you won’t treat both [problems], but it really gives you a reference point of where to start.”

Research suggests that women tend to be more bothered by urge incontinence than stress incontinence, she said, because they can regulate their activities or avoid the stress form.
 

Beware of acute incontinence cases

“If a woman walks in and says ‘Everything was great until a week or two ago, but now I’m living in pads,’ it could be a fecal impaction or a pelvic mass,” Dr. Karram said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Discuss the many treatment options

In some cases of incontinence, Dr. Ridgeway said she’ll mention “the array of treatment options, such as pelvic floor physical therapy, bladder retraining, vaginal estrogen, medications, and Botox.”

She added: “I explain that we’ll work together, and sometimes it will take a couple tries, or we’ll try a couple things at once.”

Dr. Ridgeway disclosed consulting for Coloplast and serving as an independent contractor (legal) for Ethicon. Dr. Karram disclosed speaking for Allergan, Astellas Pharma, Coloplast, and Cynosure/Hologic; consulting for Coloplast and Cynosure/Hologic; and receiving royalties from BihlerMed.

LAS VEGAS – A pelvic surgeon brought a bold message to a gathering of gynecologists: There’s a great gap in American care for pelvic floor disorders such as urinary incontinence, and they’re the right physicians to make a difference by treating these common conditions.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

“There are never going to be enough specialists to deal with these problems. This is a natural progression for many of you,” said urogynecologist and pelvic surgeon Mickey M. Karram, MD, in a joint presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium. In fact, he said, “there’s so much disease out there to fix that you may become more overwhelmed.”

Dr. Karram, who has offices in Cincinnati, Beverly Hills, and Orange County, Calif., spoke about female urinary incontinence with obstetrician-gynecologist Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, of Cleveland Clinic. They offered these tips:

Test for stress incontinence

Dr. Karram recommends using a “quick and easy” cystometrogram (CMG) test to “corroborate or refute what the patient thinks is going on” in regard to urinary function. “With this simple test, you’ll get a clear understanding of sensation [to urinate] and of what their fullness and capacity numbers are,” he said. And if you have the patient cough or strain during the test, “you should be able to duplicate a sign of stress incontinence 90% of the time.”

If patients don’t leak when they take this test, there may be another problem such as overactive bladder, a condition that can’t be duplicated via the test, he said.
 

Ask the right questions

When it comes to identifying when they have urinary difficulties, some patients “say yes to every question we ask,” said Dr. Ridgeway, and they may not be able to distinguish between urgency and leakage.

A better approach is to ask women to provide specific examples of when they have continence issues, she said. It’s also useful to ask patients about what bothers them the most if they have multiple symptoms: Is it urgency (“Gotta go; gotta go”)? Leakage during certain situations like coughing and laughing? “That helps me decide how to go about treating them first and foremost,” she said. “It doesn’t mean you won’t treat both [problems], but it really gives you a reference point of where to start.”

Research suggests that women tend to be more bothered by urge incontinence than stress incontinence, she said, because they can regulate their activities or avoid the stress form.
 

Beware of acute incontinence cases

“If a woman walks in and says ‘Everything was great until a week or two ago, but now I’m living in pads,’ it could be a fecal impaction or a pelvic mass,” Dr. Karram said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Discuss the many treatment options

In some cases of incontinence, Dr. Ridgeway said she’ll mention “the array of treatment options, such as pelvic floor physical therapy, bladder retraining, vaginal estrogen, medications, and Botox.”

She added: “I explain that we’ll work together, and sometimes it will take a couple tries, or we’ll try a couple things at once.”

Dr. Ridgeway disclosed consulting for Coloplast and serving as an independent contractor (legal) for Ethicon. Dr. Karram disclosed speaking for Allergan, Astellas Pharma, Coloplast, and Cynosure/Hologic; consulting for Coloplast and Cynosure/Hologic; and receiving royalties from BihlerMed.

LAS VEGAS – The removal of both ovaries during hysterectomy – bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) – has declined sharply in popularity as physicians have become more aware of its risks.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

Still, “we’re still seeing a relatively high rate of inappropriate BSO,” Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, said, despite “the many benefits of ovarian conservation. Strong consideration should be made for maintaining normal ovaries in premenopausal women who are not at higher genetic risk of ovarian cancer.”

Dr. Nickles Fader, director of the Kelly gynecologic oncology service and the director of the center for rare gynecologic cancers at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, urged gynecologists to understand the data about ovarian conservation in hysterectomy and carefully counsel patients.

“We can counsel patients with 100% certainty that BSO absolutely reduces ovarian and fallopian tube cancer rates. That’s a given,” she said. “Women get very excited about that, but you’ve got to be careful to counsel them about the flip side: The overall benefit may not be there when you consider the other morbidity and mortality that may occur because of this removal.”

As she noted, multiple retrospective, prospective, and observational studies have linked ovary removal to a variety of heightened risks, especially on the cardiac front. She highlighted a 2009 study of nearly 30,000 nurses who’d undergone hysterectomy for benign disease, about which the authors wrote that, “compared with ovarian conservation, bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with a decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer but an increased risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, and lung cancer.” No age group gained a survival benefit from oophorectomy (Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113[5]:1027-37 ).

Meanwhile, over the past decade, the “pendulum has swung” toward ovary conservation, at least in premenopausal women, Dr. Nickles Fader said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

A 2016 analysis of health statistics in five U.S. Eastern and Midwestern states found that, rates of hospital-based, hysterectomy-alone procedures grew by 15% from 2005 to 2013, while rates of oophorectomy alone and hysterectomy/oophorectomy combination procedures declined by 12% and 29%, respectively.

Still, Dr. Nickles Fader said, as many as 60% of hysterectomies are still performed in conjunction with oophorectomy.

Ovary removal, of course, can be appropriate when patients are at risk of ovarian cancer. Hereditary ovarian cancer accounts for up to 25% of epithelial ovarian cancer, she said, and research suggests that risk-reducing surgery is an effective preventative approach when high-penetrance genes are present. However, the value of the surgery is less clear in regard to moderate-penetrance genes.

Dr. Nickles Fader pointed to guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network that specify genes and syndromes that should trigger risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or hysterectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after childbirth.

Researchers are exploring salpingectomy – fallopian tube removal – as a possible replacement for oophorectomy. Dr. Nickles Fader highlighted a small pilot study published in 2018 that reported “BRCA mutation carriers who underwent bilateral salpingectomy had no intraoperative complications, were satisfied with their procedure choice, and had decreased cancer worry and anxiety after the procedure.”

Moving forward, she said, research will provide more insight into preventative options such as removing fallopian tubes alone instead of ovaries. “We’re starting to learn, and will probably know in the next 10-15 years, whether oophorectomy is necessary for all high-risk and moderate-risk women or if we can get away with removing their tubes and giving them the maximal health benefits of ovarian conservation.”

Dr. Nickles Fader reported consulting for Ethicon Endosurgery.

LAS VEGAS – The removal of both ovaries during hysterectomy – bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) – has declined sharply in popularity as physicians have become more aware of its risks.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

Still, “we’re still seeing a relatively high rate of inappropriate BSO,” Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, said, despite “the many benefits of ovarian conservation. Strong consideration should be made for maintaining normal ovaries in premenopausal women who are not at higher genetic risk of ovarian cancer.”

Dr. Nickles Fader, director of the Kelly gynecologic oncology service and the director of the center for rare gynecologic cancers at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, urged gynecologists to understand the data about ovarian conservation in hysterectomy and carefully counsel patients.

“We can counsel patients with 100% certainty that BSO absolutely reduces ovarian and fallopian tube cancer rates. That’s a given,” she said. “Women get very excited about that, but you’ve got to be careful to counsel them about the flip side: The overall benefit may not be there when you consider the other morbidity and mortality that may occur because of this removal.”

As she noted, multiple retrospective, prospective, and observational studies have linked ovary removal to a variety of heightened risks, especially on the cardiac front. She highlighted a 2009 study of nearly 30,000 nurses who’d undergone hysterectomy for benign disease, about which the authors wrote that, “compared with ovarian conservation, bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with a decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer but an increased risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, and lung cancer.” No age group gained a survival benefit from oophorectomy (Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113[5]:1027-37 ).

Meanwhile, over the past decade, the “pendulum has swung” toward ovary conservation, at least in premenopausal women, Dr. Nickles Fader said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

A 2016 analysis of health statistics in five U.S. Eastern and Midwestern states found that, rates of hospital-based, hysterectomy-alone procedures grew by 15% from 2005 to 2013, while rates of oophorectomy alone and hysterectomy/oophorectomy combination procedures declined by 12% and 29%, respectively.

Still, Dr. Nickles Fader said, as many as 60% of hysterectomies are still performed in conjunction with oophorectomy.

Ovary removal, of course, can be appropriate when patients are at risk of ovarian cancer. Hereditary ovarian cancer accounts for up to 25% of epithelial ovarian cancer, she said, and research suggests that risk-reducing surgery is an effective preventative approach when high-penetrance genes are present. However, the value of the surgery is less clear in regard to moderate-penetrance genes.

Dr. Nickles Fader pointed to guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network that specify genes and syndromes that should trigger risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or hysterectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after childbirth.

Researchers are exploring salpingectomy – fallopian tube removal – as a possible replacement for oophorectomy. Dr. Nickles Fader highlighted a small pilot study published in 2018 that reported “BRCA mutation carriers who underwent bilateral salpingectomy had no intraoperative complications, were satisfied with their procedure choice, and had decreased cancer worry and anxiety after the procedure.”

Moving forward, she said, research will provide more insight into preventative options such as removing fallopian tubes alone instead of ovaries. “We’re starting to learn, and will probably know in the next 10-15 years, whether oophorectomy is necessary for all high-risk and moderate-risk women or if we can get away with removing their tubes and giving them the maximal health benefits of ovarian conservation.”

Dr. Nickles Fader reported consulting for Ethicon Endosurgery.

LAS VEGAS – The removal of both ovaries during hysterectomy – bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) – has declined sharply in popularity as physicians have become more aware of its risks.

Courtesy Cashman Photo

Still, “we’re still seeing a relatively high rate of inappropriate BSO,” Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, said, despite “the many benefits of ovarian conservation. Strong consideration should be made for maintaining normal ovaries in premenopausal women who are not at higher genetic risk of ovarian cancer.”

Dr. Nickles Fader, director of the Kelly gynecologic oncology service and the director of the center for rare gynecologic cancers at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, urged gynecologists to understand the data about ovarian conservation in hysterectomy and carefully counsel patients.

“We can counsel patients with 100% certainty that BSO absolutely reduces ovarian and fallopian tube cancer rates. That’s a given,” she said. “Women get very excited about that, but you’ve got to be careful to counsel them about the flip side: The overall benefit may not be there when you consider the other morbidity and mortality that may occur because of this removal.”

As she noted, multiple retrospective, prospective, and observational studies have linked ovary removal to a variety of heightened risks, especially on the cardiac front. She highlighted a 2009 study of nearly 30,000 nurses who’d undergone hysterectomy for benign disease, about which the authors wrote that, “compared with ovarian conservation, bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with a decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer but an increased risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, and lung cancer.” No age group gained a survival benefit from oophorectomy (Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113[5]:1027-37 ).

Meanwhile, over the past decade, the “pendulum has swung” toward ovary conservation, at least in premenopausal women, Dr. Nickles Fader said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

A 2016 analysis of health statistics in five U.S. Eastern and Midwestern states found that, rates of hospital-based, hysterectomy-alone procedures grew by 15% from 2005 to 2013, while rates of oophorectomy alone and hysterectomy/oophorectomy combination procedures declined by 12% and 29%, respectively.

Still, Dr. Nickles Fader said, as many as 60% of hysterectomies are still performed in conjunction with oophorectomy.

Ovary removal, of course, can be appropriate when patients are at risk of ovarian cancer. Hereditary ovarian cancer accounts for up to 25% of epithelial ovarian cancer, she said, and research suggests that risk-reducing surgery is an effective preventative approach when high-penetrance genes are present. However, the value of the surgery is less clear in regard to moderate-penetrance genes.

Dr. Nickles Fader pointed to guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network that specify genes and syndromes that should trigger risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or hysterectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after childbirth.

Researchers are exploring salpingectomy – fallopian tube removal – as a possible replacement for oophorectomy. Dr. Nickles Fader highlighted a small pilot study published in 2018 that reported “BRCA mutation carriers who underwent bilateral salpingectomy had no intraoperative complications, were satisfied with their procedure choice, and had decreased cancer worry and anxiety after the procedure.”

Moving forward, she said, research will provide more insight into preventative options such as removing fallopian tubes alone instead of ovaries. “We’re starting to learn, and will probably know in the next 10-15 years, whether oophorectomy is necessary for all high-risk and moderate-risk women or if we can get away with removing their tubes and giving them the maximal health benefits of ovarian conservation.”

Dr. Nickles Fader reported consulting for Ethicon Endosurgery.