Conference Coverage

Combination treatment shows promise for men with advanced prostate cancer


 

FROM ESMO 2021

The combination of nivolumab (Opdivo, Bristol Myers Squibb) and rucaparib (Rubraca, Clovis Oncology) demonstrated noteworthy activity among patients with metastatic prostate cancer harboring BRCA mutations, according to new research presented Sept. 18 (abstract 579MO) at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress 2021.

The findings were specific to patients not yet been treated with chemotherapy and whose tumors were positive for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). However, for patients whose tumors were negative for HRD, the clinical activity was limited, said Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and lead investigator for the study called CheckMate 9KD (NCT03338790) .

The patients who were included in all CheckMate 9KD cohorts had no prior treatment with targeted T-cell co-stimulation or immune checkpoint pathways. They had metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer with documented disease progression, ECOG performance status of 0-1, and tissue available for HRD testing.

Dr. Petrylak offered an updated analysis of cohort A2 with 71 patients (median age 73 years), all of whom had received 1-2 prior new hormonal therapies in the pre-chemotherapy setting. Patients who had received prior PARP inhibitors were ineligible, as were those who refused chemotherapy treatment.

ORR/PSA RR primary endpoints

Patients received nivolumab and rucaparib, nivolumab at 480 mg (q4 weeks up to 2 years) and rucaparib at 600 mg b.i.d., until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Objective response rate and PSA response rate (PSA-RR) were the primary endpoint, with overall survival as a secondary endpoint, along with time to objective response, duration of objective response, time to PSA progression, safety, and radiographic progression-free survival.

Median follow-up was 17.5 months with median treatment duration of 4.6 months in the nivolumab group and 5.5 months for rucaparib. At the time of the final database lock in March 2021, 65 patients (91.5%) had discontinued treatment, most often for disease progression (n = 43; 60.6%) or study drug toxicity (n = 8; 11.3%). Four patients (5.6%) remained on treatment.

Better responses for HRD and BRCA 1/2 positive

Stratifying response outcomes showed higher rates for patients who were HRD positive and BRCA1/2 positive for confirmed objective response rate (HRD+ 25.0%, BRCA 1/2+ 33.3%, HRD-/not evaluable 5.3%, all patients 15.4%) and for PSA response (HRD+ 41.9%, BRCA 1/2+ 84.6%, HRD-/not evaluable 14.3%, all patients 27.3%). Partial response rates were 33.3% for BRCA 1/2, 25.0% for HRD positive, 5.3% for HRD- and 15.4% for all patients. Radiographic progression-free survival was longer in the HRD positive group at a median of 10.9 months (95% CI 6.7-12.0), compared with 5.6 months (3.7-9.1) in the HRD-/not evaluable group. Overall survival was similar in the HRD negative group/not evaluable group at 19.0 months (8.2-22.1) and the HRD positive group at 22.7 months (14.1-NE).

Pages

Recommended Reading

Bone drugs for prostate cancer may result in survival benefit
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
One in three cancer articles on social media has wrong info
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
‘Routine’ use of focal therapy for prostate cancer in next 5 years
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Although inconclusive, CV safety study of cancer therapy attracts attention
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
‘Dawn of a new era’ in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Old saying about prostate cancer not true when it’s metastatic
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Accelerated approval now full for pembro in bladder cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Severe skin reactions with enfortumab vedotin
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Immunotherapy for cancer patients with poor PS needs a rethink
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Most community-based oncologists skip biomarker testing
MDedge Hematology and Oncology