From the Journals

Functional Limitations in Axial Spondyloarthritis Benefit From Long-term Exercise Therapy


 

TOPLINE:

Long-term, supervised exercise therapy significantly improves the functional ability and quality of life in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and severe functional limitations.

METHODOLOGY:

  • This 52-week study evaluated the effectiveness of personalized exercise therapy in adults with axSpA and severe functional limitations.
  • Overall, 214 participants were randomly allocated to either a personalized exercise therapy regimen or usual care for 52 weeks.
  • The supervised exercise therapy regimen consisted of various exercises, patient education, goal setting, and physical activity promotion for up to 64 sessions.
  • The primary endpoint was a change in the highest-ranked Patient-Specific Complaints Numeric Rating Scale (PSC1) score at 52 weeks, and secondary endpoints included measures of physical functioning and quality of life.

TAKEAWAY:

  • At 52 weeks, the exercise group showed a greater improvement in the primary outcome measure (PSC1) than the usual-care group, with a mean difference of −1.8 (95% CI, −2.4 to −1.2).
  • Exercise therapy led to significant improvements in functional disability and physical quality of life.
  • No serious adverse events related to the intervention were reported, highlighting the safety of exercise therapy.

IN PRACTICE:

“If guided by a trained physical therapist applying a personalized approach, people with severe functional limitations due to an unfavorable course or comorbidities can be just as responsive to training as people with axSpA without severe limitations,” the authors wrote.

SOURCE:

The study was led by Maria A.T. van Wissen, Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands, and published online in Rheumatology.

LIMITATIONS:

The study’s reliance on self-reported data for axSpA treatment-related medication may have compromised accuracy. Additionally, the lack of information on medication changes during the study period could affect result interpretation.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was supported by grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy; and Dutch Arthritis Society. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Poor Use of ICD-10 Rheumatology Codes Suggests New Approach Needed for ICD-11 Adoption
MDedge Rheumatology
Cancer Identified Via Serum Metabolites, Lipids in Rheumatic Disease or Paraneoplasia
MDedge Rheumatology
CVD Risk Rises With Higher NSAID Doses in Ankylosing Spondylitis
MDedge Rheumatology
Specialists Are ‘Underwater’ With Some Insurance-Preferred Biosimilars
MDedge Rheumatology
High NSAID Use in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis May Not Raise Risk for Hypertension
MDedge Rheumatology
Spondyloarthritis Screening Study Finds ‘High Burden of Need’ in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
MDedge Rheumatology
Clear Coverage Preference for Humira Over Biosimilars Seen in Most Medicare Part D Plans
MDedge Rheumatology
What’s in a Name: Defining Difficult-to-Treat axSpA and PsA
MDedge Rheumatology
Patient-Driven Care Plus Telemonitoring Yields Promising Results for Spondyloarthritis
MDedge Rheumatology
Debate Over Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis Still Unresolved Despite New Studies
MDedge Rheumatology