PURLs

Should breastfeeding babies be given pacifiers?

Author and Disclosure Information

Tell breastfeeding moms who ask that question that pacifier use will not interfere.


 

References

PRACTICE CHANGER

Do not discourage the use of pacifiers by healthy infants who are breastfeeding.1

STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION

A: Based on a good-quality meta-analysis

Jaafar SH, Jahanfar S, Angolkar M, et al. Pacifier use versus no pacifier use in breastfeeding term infants for increasing duration of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(3):CD007202.

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

A 28-year-old first-time mother brings her 1-week-old full-term, healthy daughter to your clinic for a routine check-up. The baby is growing as expected. The mother is breastfeeding exclusively and would like to continue until the baby is at least 6 months old. She has begun giving the infant a pacifier and asks whether that’s OK. What should you tell her?

Breast milk is superior to formula for infant nutrition,2,3 and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), World Health Organization (WHO), and UNICEF recommend exclusive breastfeeding through the first 6 months of life.4,5 “Ten steps to successful breastfeeding,” a document developed by the WHO and UNICEF, specifically states that artificial teats and pacifiers should not be given to breastfeeding infants.5

Concern about pacifiers for breastfeeding infants focuses on “nipple confusion”—that is, that pacifiers (and supplemental bottles) do not facilitate effective breast sucking and may contribute to incorrect latch.6,7 Findings from earlier observational stud-ies suggest that early exposure to pacifiers leads to cessation of exclusive breastfeeding by 3 to 6 months and an end to all breastfeeding by 12 months.8,9

Pacifiers have become a cultural norm in many parts of the world,10 and their use appears to be associated with a decrease in the incidence of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).11 But both the AAP and the American Academy of Family Physicians recommend delaying paci-fier use until breastfeeding is established.4,12

STUDY SUMMARY: Pacifier or no pacifier— no significant difference

Cochrane reviewers conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of pacifier use on healthy full-term infants whose mothers had initiated breastfeeding and intended to exclusively breastfeed.1

The primary outcome was the duration of breastfeeding, as measured by (1) mean duration of full breastfeeding (in months); (2) mean duration of any or partial breastfeeding; or (3) the prevalence or proportion of infants who were fully or partially breastfed at 3, 4, and 6 months of age. Secondary outcomes were (1) rate of breastfeeding difficulties (cracked nipples, breast engorgement, mastitis); (2) maternal satisfaction and level of confidence in parenting; (3) frequency of infant crying and fussiness; and (4) infant health, including SIDS, oral candidiasis, otitis media, and dental malocclusion. Infants who were given pacifiers (ie, those who had unrestricted or actively encouraged pacifier use) were compared with infants who were not given pacifiers (ie, whose mothers were advised against pacifier use).

Two studies, with a combined total of 1302 infants, were included in the meta-analysis (a third was excluded because the method by which allocation was concealed was un-clear). Both reported blinding of the research nurses and outcome assessors. Blinding of par-ticipants was not feasible.

Each trial measured at least one primary outcome. The dropout rate was <10% in each arm of both studies.

When pacifier use was compared with no pacifier use, no significant difference was found in the proportion of infants who were exclusively breastfed at 3 months (risk ratio [RR]=1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.06) or 4 months of age (RR=0.99; 95% CI, 0.92-1.06). Nor was there a significant difference in the proportion of infants who were partially breastfed at 3 months (RR=1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02) or 4 months (RR=1.01; 95% CI, 0.98-1.03).

Neither study reported on any of the secondary outcomes.

Pages

Copyright © 2012 The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.

Recommended Reading

Don't Rush Psoriasis Diagnosis in Children
MDedge Family Medicine
Heeding the Need to Feed Kids with CF
MDedge Family Medicine
Is My Child 'Bipolar'?
MDedge Family Medicine
Early Dx, Aggressive Treatment Promising for Teen Endometriosis
MDedge Family Medicine
GERD Associated With Worse Infant Respiratory Disease
MDedge Family Medicine
Underlying Health Conditions May Boost C. difficile Risk in Kids
MDedge Family Medicine
Build Trust to Overcome Vaccine Hesitancy
MDedge Family Medicine
Genetic Discoveries May Help Kids With ADHD, Expert Says
MDedge Family Medicine
Pediatric Asthma Admissions Varied Greatly By Neighborhood
MDedge Family Medicine
Metformin Monotherapy Fails 50% of Children With Type 2 Diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine