Clinical Review

Type III Acromioclavicular Separation: Rationale for Anatomical Reconstruction

Author and Disclosure Information

Treatment of acute type III acromioclavicular separation is controversial. In some patients, nonoperative treatment is associated with pain, weakness, and stiffness. Many acromioclavicular joint reconstructions are associated with complications and results not substantially better than those of nonoperative treatment. Use of autogenous free tendon graft to anatomically reconstruct the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments offers several advantages over other surgical techniques. These advantages include improved biomechanical properties, no foreign body implantation, biological fixation, anatomical reconstruction, and early rehabilitation.


 

Recommended Reading

Knee Dislocation in a 9-Year-Old Boy
MDedge Surgery
Coracoclavicular Stabilization Using a Suture Anchor Technique
MDedge Surgery
Incidence and Variance of Knee Injuries in Elite College Football Players
MDedge Surgery
Bilateral Femoral Insufficiency Fractures Presenting as Knee Pain in a Patient With Hypophosphatemic Vitamin D–Resistant Rickets
MDedge Surgery
Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head Following Intramedullary Nailing of the Femur in a Skeletally Mature Young Adult: A Case Report
MDedge Surgery
A New Technique for Establishing and Maintaining an Anteromedial Knee Portal
MDedge Surgery
Endovascular Management of Pseudoaneurysms Following Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery
MDedge Surgery
The Forgotten Joints
MDedge Surgery
Midfoot Arthritis
MDedge Surgery
Newly Available, Newly Approved
MDedge Surgery