News for Your Practice

Optimal gestational age for cell-free DNA sampling in obese women

Since cell-free (cf)DNA screening failure rates increase with gestational age in obese women, should cfDNA testing be delayed in this population?


 

References

cfDNA screening failures occur in 1% to 12% of samples, a rate that has an inverse relationship to gestational age. Recent studies have shown an increased risk for screening failures among obese women. To determine the optimal gestational age for cfDNA testing among obese women, Mary C. Livergood, MD, and colleagues at the Mercy Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri, performed a retrospective cohort study of those undergoing cfDNA testing at one center from 2011 through 2016. Study results recently were published online in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.1

Details of the study

Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for a cfDNA screening failure (referred to as a “no call” in the study) were determined for each body mass index (BMI) weight class (TABLE). Each BMI weight class also was compared with the aOR of normal-weight women (BMI <25.0 kg/m2). The predicted probability of a no call was determined for each week of gestational age for normal weight and obese women and the results were compared.1

Among the 2,385 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 4.4% (n = 105) received a no call. Compared with normal weight women, the aOR of no call increased as weight increased from overweight (aOR, 2.31 [95% CI, 1.21–4.42]) to obesity class III (aOR, 8.55 [95% CI, 4.16–17.56]).1

At 21 weeks’ gestation, a cut-point was identified for obesity class II/III women (ie, there was no longer a significant difference in the probability of no call when compared with normal-weight women). From 8 to 16 weeks’ gestation, there was a 4.5% reduction in the probability of a no call for obesity class II/III women (aOR, 14.9; 95% CI, 8.95–20.78 and aOR, 10.4; 95% CI, 7.20–13.61; Ptrend<.01).1

Although the authors conclude that a cut-point of 21 weeks’ gestation allowed for optimal sampling of cfDNA in obese women, they also acknowledge that this cut-point limits a woman’s reproductive choices. However, they say that delaying cfDNA testing in obese women is a reasonable strategy to reduce the probability of screening failure.1

Recommended Reading

Perinatal depression screening is just the start
MDedge ObGyn
Product Update: Sureglide Cesarean Scalpel; Viveve Medical; NovaSure ADVANCED
MDedge ObGyn
She wanted to labor on hands and knees
MDedge ObGyn
How and when umbilical cord gas analysis can justify your obstetric management
MDedge ObGyn
Maternal vitamin E isoform levels possible marker for infant wheezing risk
MDedge ObGyn
ACOG stresses widespread prepregnancy carrier screening
MDedge ObGyn
Birth defects in United States up 20-fold since Zika outbreak began
MDedge ObGyn
VIDEO: Despite promises of abstinence, isotretinoin-exposed pregnancies still occur
MDedge ObGyn
Cervicovaginal microbiota correlates with preterm birth rate
MDedge ObGyn
Early elective deliveries occur in less than 2% of births
MDedge ObGyn