From the Editor

California dreamin’: Who will save the uninsured?


 

References

The number of uninsured Americans has jumped to 43.6 million—over 15% of the population. According to the Census Bureau, 80% of the uninsured belong to working families. Since the poor and disabled are often eligible for Medicaid and Medicare, middle-class families are most likely to be uninsured.

The median family income is about $42,000; median annual housing, $14,000. In 2004, the annual cost of a family health plan was over $10,000—a price simply unaffordable for many. Those who do have job-based insurance justifiably fear losing coverage, as an increasing number of companies reduce or eliminate insurance due to escalating costs: Premiums rose by 13.9% in 2003—the third consecutive year of double-digit increases.

Mandated coverage: Foresight or folly?

As one of his last acts as California governor, Gray Davis signed a bill (SB-2, Burton-Speier) requiring employers, with limited exceptions, to offer health insurance. SB-2 mandates firms with 50 or more employees to either pay into a fund, from which the state will provide insurance, or offer coverage directly. Prior to legislation, 64% of California employers expressed support for such a plan, noting that if all employers were affected, no company could gain a competitive advantage.

The California Chamber of Commerce opposed the bill, due to its potential impact on the state’s 1 million small companies; the Chamber fears these may move to neighboring states. But labor groups contend that businesses such as restaurants and dry cleaners are unlikely to leave. Still, the Chamber and others will challenge the law in court (some lawyers believe it is an “illegal tax”), and voters will decide whether to repeal it in November.

What will November bring?

To call attention to the problem, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in mid-May sponsored Cover the Uninsured Week, when both Democrats and Republicans introduced insurance reform plans, and the AMA published a Special Communication1 proposing tax credits for purchase of health coverage.

It seems most Americans support insurance for all working families, and debate is raging in the presidential campaign. John Kerry has called for insurance coverage for every child, and for universal access to the health benefits federal employees receive. President Bush opposes universal insurance, preferring a series of adjustments to increase access.

Foreign policy may overshadow health insurance in the election, but movement toward health care access for all workers will continue. If the federal government fails to take the lead, states will pursue their own initiatives, such as those occurring in California—as well as Maine, Utah, Oregon, Idaho, and Maryland.

Recommended Reading

Hypothyroidism: Should we screen all pregnant women?
MDedge ObGyn
Minimal to mild endometriosis: 4 treatment options
MDedge ObGyn
Overgeneralizing WHI: What are they thinking?
MDedge ObGyn
Vessel-sealing reduces operative time, loss of blood
MDedge ObGyn
Laboring mother sent home; child suffers hypoxic insult
MDedge ObGyn
Prior tracheotomy delays crash cesarean
MDedge ObGyn
Tocolytics not given for preterm labor
MDedge ObGyn
Sponge overlooked, but during which cesarean?
MDedge ObGyn
Oophorectomy due to hemorrhage leads to surgical menopause
MDedge ObGyn
Anterior vaginal wall prolapse: The challenge of cystocele repair
MDedge ObGyn