Table 2
Antidepressants for bipolar depression: MAOIs, TCAs, and bupropion*
Acute efficacy | Reported switch risk |
---|---|
Tranylcypromine (MAOI) | |
81% response (monotherapy) in bipolar I (n=24) or bipolar II (n=32) patients over 16 weeksa | 21% |
75% response among imipramine nonresponders (n=12)b | 17% |
Moclobemide (MAOI) | |
46% response over 8 weeks in 156 bipolar patients (some, but not all, took concomitant mood stabilizers), not significantly different from imipramine comparatorc | 4% |
Imipramine (TCA) | |
57% response rate after 3 weeks in a 6-week double-blind randomized comparison with fluoxetine or placebod | Not reported |
48% response (monotherapy) in bipolar I (n=24) or bipolar II (N=32) patients over 16 weeksa | 24% |
53% response over 8 weeks in 156 bipolar patients (some, but not all, took concomitant mood stabilizers), not significantly different from moclobemide comparatorc | 11% |
41% (coadministered with therapeutically dosed lithium)e | 8% |
Desipramine (TCA) | |
50% (5/10) response rate (coadministered with a mood stabilizer over 8 weeks)f | 50% |
Bupropion | |
55% response (5/9) (coadministered with a mood stabilizer over 8 weeks)f | 11% |
33% response rate (coadministered with mood stabilizers over 10 weeks)g | 20% |
*No data are available for isocarboxazid, mirtazapine, nefazodone, phenelzine, or selegiline transdermal | |
MAOI: monoamine oxidase inhibitor; TCA: tricyclic antidepressant | |
Source: References a. Himmelhoch JM, Thase ME, Mallinger AG, et al. Tranylcypromine versus imipramine in anergic bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:910-916. b. Thase ME, Malinger AG, McKnight D, et al. Treatment of imipramine-resistant recurrent depressions, IV: a double-blind crossover study of tranylcypromine for anergic bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:195-198. c. Silverstone T. Moclobemide vs. imipramine in bipolar depression: a multicentre double-blind clinical trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104:104-109. d. Cohn JB, Collins G, Ashbrook E, et al. A comparison of fluoxetine, imipramine and placebo in patients with bipolar depressive disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmaol. 1989;4:313-322. e. Nemeroff CB, Evans DL, Gyulai L, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of imipramine and paroxetine in the treatment of bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:906-912. f. Sachs GS, Lafer B, Stoll AL, et al. A double blind trial of bupropion versus desipramine for bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 1994;55:391-393. g. Leverich GS, Altshuler LL, Frye MA, et al. Risk of switch in mood polarity to hypomania or mania in patients with bipolar depression during acute and continuation trials of venlafaxine, sertraline, and bupropion as adjuncts to mood stabilizers. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:232-239. |
MYTH 1: Antidepressant-induced mania is a highly prevalent, widespread problem.
Reality: Although some might argue that the precise relative risk of antidepressant-induced mania or hypomania is unknown (eg, considering intervening factors such as the natural illness course), recent literature suggests that the emergence of mania or hypomania can be reasonably attributed to antidepressant use in no more than 10% to 25% of patients with bipolar disorder.5,6 Part of the difficulty in estimating the true prevalence of antidepressant-induced mania involves variability and inconsistency in defining mania induction.
A recent consensus statement proposed a graduated series of definitions for treatment-emergent affective switch:7
- “Definite” switch involves fulfilling DSM-IV syndromic criteria for a manic, hypomanic, or mixed episode for at least 2 days, within 8 weeks of antidepressant introduction.
- “Likely” switches call for at least 2 DSM-IV mania or hypomania symptoms plus a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score >12, occurring for at least 2 days, within 12 weeks of antidepressant introduction.
- “Possible” switches require a “clear change” in mood or energy with a YMRS score >8, persisting ≥4 hours over 2 days, occurring within 12 weeks of antidepressant initiation.
Adverse effects such as agitation typically diminish or remit with dosage reductions or drug cessation, whereas true antidepressant-induced polarity switches persist even after the medication is discontinued. Moreover, it is often difficult—if not impossible—to know with certainty when a polarity switch results from treatment effects vs the natural illness course. In my experience, true manic or hypomanic syndromes soon after antidepressant exposure are less common than heterogeneous, nonspecific symptoms such as agitation, anxiety, insomnia, or worsening depression (ie, lack of efficacy).
MYTH 2: Antidepressant response rates are lower in bipolar depression.
Reality: It is difficult to draw broad conclusions about antidepressant response rates in unipolar vs bipolar depression because:
- few direct comparisons have been reported
- all relevant studies are retrospective
- small sample sizes in most studies may not have satisfactorily controlled for factors that could predispose to mood destabilization (Table 3).
Table 3
What increases risk of antidepressant-induced mania?
Factor | Findings |
---|---|
History of antidepressant-induced mania or hypomania | Confers an approximate 2- to 5-fold increased risk for subsequent antidepressant-induced mania/hypomania, regardless of antidepressanta |
Recent mania preceding current depressive episode | Higher risk for antidepressant-associated mania if current depressive episode was preceded by manic phaseb |
Bipolar I vs bipolar II subtype | Greater risk for switch in bipolar Ic,d |
Comorbid alcohol or substance use disorder | 5- to 7-fold increased risk for antidepressant-associated maniae |
Noradrenergic vs serotonergic antidepressants | Possible higher risk for mania induction with TCAs or SNRIs than with bupropionf or SSRIsg |
Concurrent mania symptoms during a depressive episode | Mild or subthreshold mania symptoms during a depressive episode increase risk for maniah,i |
Hyperthymic temperamental traits | Associated with increased likelihood of antidepressant-induced maniaj |
SNRIs: serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; SSRIs: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; TCAs: tricyclic antidepressants | |
Source: References a. Truman CJ, Goldberg JF, Ghaemi SN, et al. Self-reported history of manic/hypomanic switch associated with antidepressant use: data from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD). J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68:1472-1479. b. MacQueen GM, Young LT, Marriott M, et al. Previous mood state predicts response and switch rates in patients with bipolar depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;105:414-418. c. Himmelhoch JM, Thase ME, Mallinger AG, et al. Tranylcypromine versus imipramine in anergic bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:910-916. d. Altshuler LL, Suppes T, Black DO, et al. Lower switch rate in depressed patients with bipolar II than bipolar I disorder treated adjunctively with second-generation antidepressants. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:313-315. e. Goldberg JF, Truman CJ. Antidepressant-induced mania: an overview of current controversies. Bipolar Disord. 2003;5:407-420. f. Sachs GS, Lafer B, Stoll AL, et al. A double blind trial of bupropion versus desipramine for bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 1994;55:391-393. g. Peet M. Induction of mania with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants. Br J Psychiatry. 1994;164:549-550. h. Frye MA, Hellmann G, McElroy SL, et al. Correlates of treatment-emergent mania associated with antidepressant treatment in bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:164-172. i. Bottlender R, Rudolf D, Strauss A, et al. Mood-stabilisers reduce the risk of developing antidepressant-induced maniform states in acute treatment of bipolar I depressed patients. J Affect Disord. 2001;63:79-83. j. Henry C, Sorbara F, Lacoste J, et al. Antidepressant-induced mania in bipolar patients: identification of risk factors. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62:249-255. |