Percutaneous pins are much more forgiving than rigid internal fixation. If the initial placement of a pin is unsatisfactory, the pin can be reinserted at little cost.12 Conversely, it may not be possible to reposition a misplaced screw or screw with inadequate purchase and still maintain adequate fixation. While percutaneous pin fixation is not as rigid as screw fixation, the degree of stability provided is adequate for the small forces affecting the hand in most cases. Accordingly, there is a very low incidence of fibrous union or nonunion.13,14 With an increasing appreciation of soft-tissue handling over the past few decades, another significant advantage of K-wire fixation is the obviation of soft-tissue dissection, preserving the biology to maximize healing and minimize adverse sequelae.12 Percutaneous fixation has been shown to achieve functional outcomes comparable to open reduction with internal fixation of operative phalangeal and metacarpal fractures, without soft-tissue disruption, scarring, or implant irritation, and with minimal risk of infection.3,13,15,16 Ultimate range of motion after percutaneous fixation is comparable, if not superior, to that of internal fixation, despite the initial advantage of rigid internal fixation secondary to decreased scarring and lack of indwelling hardware.16,17
While the risk of infection, perhaps the primary concern with percutaneous fixation, has been cited as high as 7%, osteomyelitis is exceedingly rare (<0.5%).3,13,14 Furthermore, pins are often left in place for 3 to 6 weeks, and infection has been found to occur most often at a mean of 10 weeks.7,13 Infection can also be mitigated by intelligent pin placement, relief of residual tension, and splint immobilization.4,15 Pin loosening has similarly been reported in up to 4% of cases in large retrospective studies, occurring at an average of 8 weeks, by which time most pins would have been extricated.13 Other complications related to impaling adjacent neurovascular or tendinous structures have also been cited but are rare.13 A 12-month prospective study of 75 patients specifically evaluating the outcomes after closed reduction with percutaneous fixation of unstable hand fractures in the ED reported only 6 complications at final follow-up.4 Complications were all minor, with no cases of nonunion, delayed union, malunion, pin-tract infection, pyarthrosis, or cellulitis, even in the setting of open fractures. Three patients required revision in the OR for pin migration, initial malreduction, and bone loss in the setting of comminution, respectively. The authors credited their low complication rate to supplementary immobilization.
In conclusion, many unstable simple fractures and dislocations of the hand and wrist can be safely and effectively treated in the ED. While it may seem daunting for a junior resident who is unfamiliar with percutaneous techniques, the authors advocate learning from a more senior mentor. The only additional training required is an understanding of how to apply this skill set in a different setting.