Clinical Review

Evolution of Femoroacetabular Impingement Treatment: The ANCHOR Experience

Author and Disclosure Information

Our understanding of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) as a cause of hip pain and secondary osteoarthritis has rapidly evolved since Ganz’s description in 2003, which refined concepts described a half century earlier. The concepts of cam and pincer-type impingement continue to be better defined and have evolved from relatively simple concepts to more complex and variable disease patterns that are patient-specific. Ganz and colleagues described open treatment of FAI through the development of the surgical hip dislocation approach. Increased experience and advances in arthroscopic techniques have increasingly allowed for arthroscopic treatment of the most common FAI deformities. Yet, adequate bony correction of FAI continues to be a challenge for many surgeons and remains a common cause for revision surgery. Inferior outcomes after revision FAI surgery might indicate the importance of an accurate correction, regardless of the surgical approach, during the index surgery. Open surgical dislocation continues to play a role in the treatment of complex FAI where additional reconstruction is necessary or adequate bony correction may be inconsistently performed or inaccessible via an arthroscopic approach.


 

References

Take-Home Points

  • Our understanding of FAI has evolved from cam-type and pincer-type impingement to much more complex disease patterns.
  • Most surgeons are performing less aggressive acetabular rim trimming.
  • Inadequate osseous correction is still the most common cause of the failed hip arthroscopy.
  • Labral preservation is important to maintaining suction seal effect.
  • Open surgical techniques have a role for more severe and complex FAI deformities.

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) was described by Ganz and colleagues1 in 2003 as a refinement of concepts introduced decades earlier. This description advanced our understanding of FAI as a mechanism for prearthritic hip pain and secondary hip osteoarthritis1 (OA) and allowed for treatment of FAI. The concept of proximal femoral and acetabular/pelvic deformity contributing to OA had been previously speculated by Smith-Petersen,2 Murray,3 Solomon,4 and Stulberg.5 Early cases of overcorrection of dysplasia using the periacetabular osteotomy created iatrogenic FAI, which further stimulated early development of the FAI concept.6 Improved anatomical characterization of the proximal femoral blood supply (medial femoral circumflex artery) allowed for development of the open surgical hip dislocation.7 Through open surgical hip dislocation, an improved understanding of hip pathomechanics by direct visualization helped pave the way for a better understanding of FAI. Open surgical hip dislocation allows for global treatment of labrochondral pathology and deformity of the proximal femoral head–neck junction and/or acetabular rim in FAI.

Hip arthroscopy has further developed and improved our understanding of FAI. Early hip arthroscopy was generally limited to débridement of labral and chondral pathology, and management of the soft-tissue structures. Advances in the understanding of FAI through open techniques allowed for application of similar techniques to hip arthroscopy. Improvements in arthroscopic instrumentation and techniques have allowed for treatment of labrochondral and acetabular-sided rim deformity in the central compartment and cam morphologies in the peripheral compartment through arthroscopic surgery. Appropriate bony correction by arthroscopic techniques has always been a concern, but improved techniques, dynamic assessment, and accurate use of intraoperative imaging have made this feasible and more predictable. Treatment of cam deformities extending adjacent and proximal to the retinacular vessels is possible but more technically demanding. Inadequate bony correction of FAI by arthroscopic means remains one of the most common causes of failure.8-10In 2013, the Academic Network of Conservational Hip Outcome Research (ANCHOR) Study Group reported the characteristics of a FAI cohort of 1130 hips (1076 patients) that underwent surgical treatment of FAI across 8 institutions and 12 surgeons.11 At that time, most ANCHOR surgeons (or surgeon groups) performed both open and arthroscopic surgeries and had significant referral volumes of complex cases that may have overrepresented the proportion of complex FAI cases in the cohort. During the 2008 to 2011 study period, FAI was treated with arthroscopy in 56% of these cases, open surgical hip dislocation in 34%, and reverse periacetabular osteotomy in 9%. FAI was characterized as isolated cam-type in 48%, combined cam–pincer type in 45%, and isolated pincer-type in 8%. Fifty-five percent of the patients were female. Patient-reported outcome studies in this cohort of patients are ongoing.

The FAI Concept

In 2003, after treating more than 600 open surgical hip dislocations over the previous decade, Ganz and colleagues1 coined the term femoroacetabular impingement to describe a “mechanism for the development of early osteoarthritis for most nondysplastic hips.” They reported surgical treatment focused on “improving the clearance for hip motion and alleviation of femoral abutment against the acetabular rim” with the goal of improving pain and possibly of halting progression of the degenerative process. FAI was defined as “abnormal contact between the proximal femur and acetabular rim that occurs during terminal motion of the hip” leading to “lesions of the acetabular labrum and/or the adjacent acetabular cartilage.” Subtle, previously overlooked deformities of the proximal femur and acetabulum were recognized as the cause of FAI, “including the presence of a bony prominence usually in the anterolateral head and neck junction that is seen best on the lateral radiographs, reduced offset of the femoral neck and head junction, and changes on the acetabular rim such as os acetabuli or a double line that is seen with rim ossification.” Ganz and colleagues1 recognized that “normal or near normal” hips could also experience FAI in the setting of excessive or supraphysiologic range of motion. Cam-type and pincer-type FAI deformities were introduced as 2 distinct mechanisms of FAI. By 2003, arthroscopic hip surgery was increasingly being used as a treatment for labral tears but not bony abnormalities. These FAI concepts seemed to explain the prevalence of labral tears at the anterosuperior rim, which had been noted during hip arthroscopy, and paved the way for major changes in arthroscopic hip surgery during the next decade. The ANCHOR group reported the descriptive epidemiology of a cohort of more than 1000 patients with FAI.11

Pages

Recommended Reading

Ceramic Femoral Heads for All Patients? An Argument for Cost Containment in Hip Surgery
MDedge Surgery
Direct Anterior Versus Posterior Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasties: No Major Differences at 90 Days
MDedge Surgery
Anti–nerve growth factor drug has long-term OA pain benefit, but unclear safety
MDedge Surgery
VIDEO: Biologics: Proposed guideline addresses perioperative management
MDedge Surgery
Comparing Cost, Efficacy, and Safety of Intravenous and Topical Tranexamic Acid in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
T-Capsulotomy to Improve Visualization of the Peripheral Compartment and Repair
MDedge Surgery
Bariatric surgery or total joint replacement: which first?
MDedge Surgery
Multicenter Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: Epidemiology (MASH Study Group). What Are We Seeing in the Office, and Who Are We Choosing to Treat?
MDedge Surgery
Current Concepts in Labral Repair and Refixation: Anatomical Approach to Labral Management
MDedge Surgery
Current Techniques in Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: Capsular Repair and Plication
MDedge Surgery