From the Journals

New-onset AF after aortic valve replacement did not affect long-term survival

View on the News

Results contradict previous studies, but can still reassure

The incidence of atrial fibrillation after valve surgery has been described to be as high as 50%, Manuel J. Antunes, MD, said in an editorial commentary. “The adverse effect on long-term survival may not be related to the short-lived new-onset AF but rather to the underlying pathology associated to the arrhythmia, especially pathology that affects the myocardium, principally in atherosclerotic coronary artery disease,” he wrote. “It is not survival alone, however, that should be cause for concern; AF, even in episodes of limited duration, may result in transient ischemic attacks, ischemic, or hemorrhagic strokes, and peripheral thromboembolism, which is why affected patients should immediately be anticoagulated.”

This study, however, is at odds with previously published studies, with opposite conclusions, according to Dr. Antunes. Swinkels and his colleagues suggest that one of the reasons for the discrepancy was the homogeneous character of their series, which consisted almost entirely of patients who had isolated AVR. Dr. Antunes also adds that another important aspect to consider is that the antiarrhythmic drugs used prophylactically or therapeutically for this patient cohort (treated during 1990-1993) are no longer used or have been replaced by new and more efficacious pharmacologic agents.

Dr. Manuel J. Antunes

Dr. Manuel J. Antunes

“This contribution from Swinkels and colleagues reassures us that new-onset AF, common after heart surgery, may have no significant impact on early and late survival if sinus rhythm is effectively and permanently restored early after the onset of the arrhythmia and before the patient’s discharge from the hospital.”

Manuel J. Antunes, MD, of the University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal, made these remarks in an invited editorial (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:490-1). He reported having nothing to disclose.


 

FROM THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

New-onset atrial fibrillation after aortic valve replacement was not an independent risk factor for decreased long-term survival, according to the results of a single-center, retrospective study reported by Ben M. Swinkels, MD, of St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, and his colleagues in the Netherlands.

Key to this success, however, is restoring normal sinus rhythm before hospital discharge, they said.

In this retrospective, longitudinal cohort study, 569 consecutive patients with no history of AF who underwent AVR with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting during 1990-1993 were followed for a mean of 17.8 years (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:492-8).

Thirty-day and long-term survival rates were determined in the 241 patients (42%) with and the 328 patients (58%) without new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), which was defined as electrocardiographically documented AF lasting for at least several hours, and occurring after AVR while the patient was still admitted. Standard therapy to prevent new onset POAF was the use of sotalol in patients who were not on beta-blocker therapy, and continuation of beta-blocker therapy for those who were already on it.

There were no significant differences between the two groups in demographic characteristics. There were also no significant differences between the two groups in operative characteristics, postoperative in-hospital adverse events, and postoperative hospital lengths of stay until discharge home, except for mechanical ventilation time, which was significantly longer in the patients with new-onset POAF (P = .011).

Thirty-day mortality was 1.2% in the patients with POAF, and 2.7% in those without, a nonsignificant difference. There was no statistically significant difference between the two survival curves and the Kaplan-Meier overall cumulative survival rates at 15 years of follow-up in the patients with new-onset POAF vs. those without were not statistically different (41.5% vs. 41.3%, respectively).

In addition, the 18-year probability of long-term first adverse events, including recurrent AF, transient ischemic attack, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, peripheral venous thromboembolism, or major or minor bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups.

“New-onset POAF after AVR does not affect long-term survival when treatment is aimed to restore sinus rhythm before the patient is discharged home. Future studies with a prospective, randomized design should be done to confirm this finding in patients undergoing different kinds of cardiac surgery,” the researchers concluded.

The study was funded by the authors’ home institution; the authors reported they had nothing to disclose.

Recommended Reading

New trial shows thymectomy benefits myasthenia gravis
MDedge Surgery
Malperfusion key in aortic dissection repair outcomes
MDedge Surgery
Recovery: Where TAVR gains advantage over SAVR
MDedge Surgery
Factory contamination seen as likely source of postop endocarditis outbreak
MDedge Surgery
Ventricular assist devices linked to sepsis
MDedge Surgery
VA cohort study: Individualize SSI prophylaxis based on patient factors
MDedge Surgery
Hidden CABG costs will disrupt bundled payment systems
MDedge Surgery
Bailout stenting for coronary bifurcations brings ‘unacceptable’ hazards
MDedge Surgery
Wide variability found in invasive mediastinal staging rates for lung cancer
MDedge Surgery
Preop atrial fib in CABG patients spells trouble
MDedge Surgery

Related Articles